Research Article  Open Access
Chencong Zhao, Jun Liu, Zhouhua Xie, Feihang Zhou, "Coordinate Control of Power/Current for GridConnected Inverter Based on PCI Controller under Unbalanced Grid Conditions", Complexity, vol. 2019, Article ID 5968984, 14 pages, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5968984
Coordinate Control of Power/Current for GridConnected Inverter Based on PCI Controller under Unbalanced Grid Conditions
Abstract
The oscillations on output power and distortion of the inverter currents will occur in the case of unbalanced grid voltage faults. Constant output power and good current quality cannot be achieved simultaneously. Aiming at these problems, a coordinate control strategy for suppressing power fluctuations and current harmonics is proposed by analyzing instantaneous power control and current balance control. The proposed control is achieved by adjusting the weight coefficient of current reference values to change the current harmonic contents based on proportional complex integral (PCI) controller and proportional multiple complex integral (PMCI) controller. The control strategy with a simple control structure neither needs to detect harmonic components of the inverter currents, nor needs to separate the positive and negative components of voltage and current, which is easy to be realized. The feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed control are verified by the comparison and analysis of simulation.
1. Introduction
With the problem of global climate increasingly serious and nonrenewable resources being largely consumed, the development of renewable energy has attracted much attention. Among the many renewable energy sources, the installed capacity of wind energy is increasing year by year because of abundant resources, good industrial foundation, and low environmental pollution. The gridconnected inverter, as the gridconnected interface between wind turbine and largescale energy storage system, plays an important role in the gridconnected control of wind power system [1–4]. The operation of the gridconnected inverter is susceptible to the unbalanced grid voltage. The causes of unbalanced voltage are various: the interference of highpower singlephase load, the unbalanced distribution of singlephase load in grid and randomness of the singlephase load, etc. [5, 6]. The oscillations on output power and distortion of the inverter currents will occur under unbalanced grid faults [7, 8]. If there is a serious harmonic distortion in the threephase currents, it may not meet the IEEE Std.1547 standard that the current THD is more than 5%. Therefore, it is important to study the control strategy for gridconnected inverter under unbalanced grid voltage, which is of great significance for stable and efficient operation of the system.
Many control strategies for gridconnected inverter under unbalanced grid voltage have been proposed [5, 6, 9–20]. The traditional control strategy is the dual current vector control in the positive and negative sequence reference frames, and this method is applied in [9–11], by controlling the positive and negative components of voltage and current to eliminate oscillations on the active power. But the realization of this control objective is based on the injection of negative sequence currents, which will inevitably result in harmonics distortion in threephase inverter currents, and the oscillations on reactive power have not been eliminated. In order to obtain constant output active and reactive powers, a control scheme is proposed which utilizes the resonance compensation method without considering the distortion of inverter currents [12–14]. An interesting control method which utilizes the positive and negative sequence components is proposed in [15] for generating current reference values to reduce the imbalance of grid voltage. But this method mainly aims at current quality; the problem of power oscillations has not been solved under unbalanced grid voltage. For the three control targets, which are aimed at suppressing active power oscillations, reactive power oscillations, and negative current components, a coordinate control of power and current is proposed in [16, 17] where the current references are unified by introducing the coefficients, and the coordinate control is realized by adjusting the coefficients. However, the method requires positive and negative sequence separation and complex reference frame transformation. In addition, the method includes a large number of PI controllers, and parameters tuning is not easy to implement. In order to reduce the complexity of control, the current references of coordinate control can be obtained in stationary reference frame [5, 6, 18, 19]. A scheme is proposed in [20], which analyzes the power fluctuations and current harmonics magnitude quantitatively. Notch filter is used in the control, and the coordinate control of output power and current quality is realized by using the idea of weighting. The control strategy can reduce the harmonic contents in inverter currents. However, due to the introduction of negative sequence components in the calculation of current references, the balanced threephase currents cannot be obtained.
In this paper, the instantaneous power control and current balance control are introduced when the grid voltage is unbalanced. The essential relationships between the two control strategies are discussed and the causes of current harmonics are analyzed. On these bases, a novel control strategy is proposed, which uses PCI and PMCI controllers to control inverter currents. Weight coefficient is introduced in current references to change the harmonic contents in inverter currents, and the coordinate control of power fluctuations suppression and current balance is realized. The proposed control does not need complicated reference frame transformation, positive/negative sequence extraction calculation, and notch filter, and it is convenient to realize in the stationary reference frame.
This paper is organized as follows: Section 2 formulates the model of gridconnected inverter. Section 3 analyzes the conventional control schemes and the relationships between the two conventional control schemes. Section 4 analyzes the proposed coordinate control strategy under unbalanced grid voltage. Section 5 shows the simulation results under different cases when the grid voltage is unbalanced, which validates the proposed scheme. Section 6 concludes this paper.
2. Model of GridConnected Inverter
Figure 1 shows the topology of gridconnected inverter. , , and are the grid voltages, , , and are the output voltages of the gridconnected inverter, and are the inductance and resistance, respectively, and is the dclink voltage.
The control structure of gridconnected inverter is shown in Figure 2. The power will be transmitted to the grid through the effective control of voltage and current.
3. Conventional Control Strategies
3.1. Voltage Expressions under Unbalanced Grid Voltage
The threephase unbalanced grid voltages can be expressed aswhere and are the amplitudes of positive and negative components of voltage; and are initial phase angles of the positive and negative components, respectively; is the grid frequency.
Unbalanced grid voltage can be transformed into stationary reference frame as follows:where
3.2. Instantaneous Power Control Strategy
Based on instantaneous power theory, the active power and reactive power can be expressed aswhere and are the current components in stationary frame, respectively.
With the power references and , the current reference values can be calculated as follows:
From (5), the current references under instantaneous power control can be obtained as follows:where and are the active current components on axis and axis, respectively; and are the reactive current components.
Substituting (2) into (6), the denominator in (6) can be expressed as
It can be known that under unbalanced grid voltage, so the existence of term in (7) will result in a large amount of harmonic currents.
Based on the above analysis, it can be seen that the instantaneous power control can maintain a constant output power, but there is severe harmonics distortion in the inverter currents.
3.3. Current Balance Control Strategy
In order to obtain balanced threephase inverter currents, the negative sequence current components must be eliminated, and the current references under the current balance control strategy can be obtained as follows:where , and , are the active and reactive current components, respectively.
It can be seen that the current references do not contain harmonic terms, and the sinusoidal and balanced inverter currents can be obtained. It should be noted that the negative sequence current components are eliminated, but the negative sequence voltage components still exist in the voltage when the grid voltage is unbalanced. The interaction between the negative sequence voltage components and the positive sequence current components will result in double frequency fluctuations on the output power.
3.4. Analysis of the Two Control Strategies
Based on the above analysis, it is known that instantaneous power control or current balance control cannot achieve constant output power and balanced inverter currents simultaneously.
In order to analyze the relationships between the current references under the two control strategies, suppose that the initial phase angle . Firstly, the active current components on axis are discussed as an example. The active current references under the two control strategies are expressed as
From (9) and (10), it can be seen that is a nonsinusoidal periodic signal, and is a fundamental sinusoidal signal. According to Fourier theory, can be decomposed into a superposition of fundamental and harmonic signals as follows:
The coefficients and can be expressed aswhere . It is clear that is an odd function, can be obtained according to the nature of odd function, and the fundamental frequency component of can be expressed aswhere .
From (10) and (13), the following equation can be obtained:
For the sake of simplicity, this conclusion is obtained under the assumption of , but the same conclusion can be obtained through Fourier decomposition when . Similarly, the fundamental components of , , and can be calculated, and compared with the current references under current balance control, the essential relationships of the current references can be obtained as follows:
By combining (14) and (15), the current relationships can be obtained as follows:
From (16), it can be seen that the fundamental components of current references under instantaneous power control are equivalent to the current references under current balance control, and threephase currents are balanced. This is the essential relationship of current reference values between the two control strategies and it will lay the foundation for the design of control strategy in the next section.
4. Coordinate Control of Power/Current Design of Controller
The current references include the fundamental and harmonic components under instantaneous power control, and the current fundamental components are equivalent to the current reference values under current balance control. The current harmonic components are composed of the loworder harmonics such as third, fifth, and seventh harmonics, etc. [20]. Harmonic contents will affect the degree of power fluctuations suppression and current balance. Therefore, the coordinate control of power and current can be achieved by adjusting the harmonic contents in threephase currents under instantaneous power control. Based on the analysis, a coordinate control scheme is proposed to control the fundamental and harmonic currents simultaneously. The references of fundamental components and harmonic components can be calculated as follows:
The current references under instantaneous power control are represented in (17), and and are the output active and reactive power references. The value of in (18) is the weight coefficient. If , there are no harmonic components in the inverter currents, which means current balance control; it is equivalent to instantaneous power control when . The output active and reactive powers are constant, but the inverter currents contain lots of harmonics (); the control effect is between the effect of instantaneous power control and current balance control when 0<k<1. As the value of k increases from 0 to 1, the harmonic contents in currents will increase gradually, but the output power will tend to be constant.
The control structure of proposed control strategy is shown in Figure 3.
4.1. PCI Controller
As mentioned above, the proposed control can be implemented in the stationary reference frame. The fundamental current component in the fundamental control branch and the harmonic current components in the harmonic control branch need to be controlled, respectively. Therefore, the scheme based on the PCI controller is proposed [21].
The transfer function of the PCI controller can be expressed aswhere and represent proportional and integral coefficients, respectively. Due to the existence of plural in the transfer function, it is not easy to realize. According to the complex function theory, means that the amplitude is constant and the phase rotates counterclockwise. Based on the orthogonal relationship (i.e., = ) in reference frame, the complex domain controller can be realized by the structure, as shown in Figure 4.
Figure 5 is the bode diagram of the PCI controller. It can be seen that there is an infinite gain at the fundamental frequency (i.e., 50 Hz) and there are almost no gains in the rest of the frequency bands, so the fundamental component in the inverter currents can be controlled precisely by the PCI controller.
The harmonic components in inverter currents should also be controlled. Based on the PCI controller, PMCI controller is proposed to suppress the harmonic components.
The transfer function of PMCI controller can be expressed as
Figure 6 shows the bode diagram of the PMCI controller. The gains are infinite at the third, fifth, and seventh harmonic frequencies, while the gains are not increased significantly in the other frequency bands. Hence, the controller can be used to suppress the loworder harmonic components in the inverter currents effectively.
4.2. Performance Analysis of Proposed Control
According to the control scheme mentioned above, current inner loop control structure is shown in Figure 7, where, and represent the transfer functions of fundamental and harmonic controllers, respectively. is the equivalent gain of the PWM converter and it is often taken as = U_{dc}/2. represents the grid voltage.
According to Figure 7, the output current can be obtained as follows:where denotes the transfer function between the output current and reference of current fundamental component, denotes the transfer function between the output current and reference of current harmonic components, and denotes the transfer function between the output current and grid voltage, which can be expressed as
Based on the main parameters of the system in Table 1, the bode diagrams of transfer functions between the output current and different input reference signals can be obtained, respectively, as shown in Figures 8–10, and the control performances of proposed control strategy are analyzed.

Figure 8 shows the amplitudefrequency and phasefrequency characteristic curves of closedloop transfer function . It can be seen that the difference of tracking gain and phase at fundamental frequency (i.e., 50 Hz) tend to be 0 dB and , respectively. Therefore, the inverter currents can track the fundamental component of reference signal with equal amplitude. Similarly, the amplitude gains are attenuated greatly at the third, fifth, and seventh harmonic frequencies, which indicates that the inverter currents have almost no ability to track loworder harmonics of reference signal .
The amplitudefrequency and phasefrequency characteristic curves of closedloop transfer function are shown in Figure 9. As can be seen from the figure, the gain at the grid fundamental frequency is attenuated greatly. On the contrary, the differences of tracking gains and phases at the third, fifth, and seventh harmonic frequencies are close to 0 dB and , respectively. It indicates that the inverter currents can track the harmonic components of reference signal accurately. However, the fundamental component of the can be tracked hardly. Similarly, the amplitudefrequency and phasefrequency characteristic curves of closedloop transfer function are shown in Figure 10. The grid voltage is equivalent to a disturbance component. From Figure 10, the tracking gains at the fundamental and loworder harmonic frequencies are very small, and the influences on the inverter currents can be neglected.
Based on superposition theorem and the above graphic analysis, it can be seen that the proposed control can control threephase inverter currents effectively. The fundamental component of affects the fundamental component of inverter currents, and the loworder harmonic components of affect the loworder harmonic components of inverter currents. Therefore, this control strategy needn’t detect the loworder harmonic components of inverter currents by adjusting the weight coefficient in the references of currents to realize the control of harmonic currents, and the coordinate control of power and current is realized.
5. Simulation Results
In this section, simulations are carried out with MATLAB/Simulink environment. Figure 11 shows the grid voltages that change from a balanced condition to an unbalanced condition in three different cases. Figure 11(a) shows the grid voltage that 30% voltage dip in phase A during the period from 0.1 s to 0.5 s. Figure 11(b) shows the threephase voltages with unbalanced amplitude and phase offset. Figure 11(c) shows the unbalanced grid voltage when phase A is short circuited to the ground.
(a) Case a
(b) Case b
(c) Case c
Figure 12 shows the simulation results by using the instantaneous power control under three different unbalanced voltages. From Figure 12, it can be seen that the output active and reactive powers are constant during the period of 0.1 s~0.5 s. The dclink voltage is relatively smooth, and there are almost no doublefrequency fluctuations on output power, but the threephase inverter currents are distorted obviously. Taking phase A current as an example, harmonic spectrum analysis is carried out. It can be seen that the total harmonic current distortion (THD) is large in the three cases (i.e., 10.31%, 11.39%, and 23.65%, respectively), which does not meet the THD standard of less than 5% stipulated by the IEEE Std.1547. In the three cases, the proportions of the third harmonic are reached: 10.21%, 11.28%, and 23.04%, respectively. Therefore, if the instantaneous power control strategy is adopted, the output active and reactive powers are constant, but there is a serious distortion in the inverter currents.
(a) Case a
(b) Case b
(c) Case c
Figure 13 shows the simulation results by using current balance control in the three different cases. From Figure 13, it can be seen that there are obvious fluctuations on the output active power, reactive power, and dclink voltage when the threephase voltages are unbalanced (0.1 s~0.5 s). However, the threephase currents are balanced and sinusoidal. From the harmonic analysis of phase A current, it can be seen that the THD is 1.15% in case a, 1.39% in case b, and 2.95% in case c; the third harmonic only accounted for 0.8%, 0.86%, and 2.57%, respectively. The results satisfy the THD standard which is less than 5%. Therefore, the current balance control strategy can achieve good current quality, but the output power fluctuates significantly.
(a) Case a
(b) Case b
(c) Case c
As can be seen from Figures 12 and 13, the instantaneous power control and current balance control cannot achieve the constant output power and good current quality simultaneously, which is consistent with the result of theoretical analysis.
Figure 14 shows the simulation results using the coordinate control strategy proposed in Ref. [20] in three different cases. The control scheme can judge and weigh the output power fluctuations and harmonic currents. However, notch filter is needed in the control, the current references contain negative sequence components, and the balanced threephase currents cannot be realized.
(a) Case a
(b) Case b
(c) Case c
As can be seen from Figure 14, the weight coefficient during the period of 0.1 s to 0.2 s, the harmonics of inverter currents are small, but the active and reactive powers fluctuate greatly. During the period of 0.4 s to 0.5 s, , the active and reactive powers are constant, but the harmonics of inverter currents are relatively large. As the value of increases from 0 to 1, the threephase inverter currents gradually change from sinusoidal curve to distorted curve, and the fluctuations on output power are gradually reduced, which realize the coordinate control of power and current. However, the current curves show that the balanced threephase currents cannot be achieved. The simulation results are consistent with the theoretical analysis results.
Figure 15 shows the simulation results using the control strategy proposed in this paper. Theoretical analysis shows that, when k = 0, the reference of harmonic currents is zero, which is equivalent to the current balance control. From Figure 15, it can be observed that the output power fluctuates seriously during the period of 0.1 s to 0.2 s. However, the threephase inverter currents are balanced and sinusoidal. Based on the analysis of phase A harmonic current spectrum, it can be seen that the THD is very small in the three cases (THD = 1.59%, THD = 2.37%, and THD = 3.35%, respectively) and there are little loworder harmonics, which are consistent with the theoretical analysis. Similarly, during the period of 0.4 s to 0.5 s, k = 1, while the nature of it, which is equivalent to instantaneous power control. The output active and reactive powers are constant, but the threephase inverter currents are unbalanced and distorted. In the period of 0.2 s~0.4 s, the value of increases from 0 to 1, and from the simulation results in this stage, it can be seen that, as increases, the fluctuations on output power are decreased gradually, and the degrees of current unbalance and current distortion are increased. The simulation results verify the theoretical analysis. According to the above analysis, the coordinate control of output power and current can be realized by setting in different applications, and the selection of the coefficient in equation (18) should consider the THD of current and the fluctuations on output power based on the practical applications.
(a) Case a
(b) Case b
(c) Case c
In order to verify the dynamic response ability of active and reactive powers with step change, the results of power and threephase inverter currents in different cases are shown in Figure 16. In this verification, the active power reference is stepped from 8 kW to 15 kW at 0.4 s, while the reactive power reference is stepped from 0 kW to 5 kW for the construction of a friendly power grid. It can be seen that the output active power and reactive power have a step change at 0.4 s. At this stage, the proposed control can also be applied well. As changes from 0 to 1, the fluctuations on output power decrease gradually, and the distortion degree of inverter currents increases gradually. After 0.5 s, the grid faults are eliminated, the active power and reactive power are almost constant, and inverter currents are sinusoidal. Therefore, the proposed control has no effect on the operation of the ideal grid, which shows that the proposed control is applicable to both ideal and unbalanced grid conditions. From Figure 16(c), it can be seen that, as the voltage drops dramatically, the peak value of the output currents is increased to maintain the output power. However, in practical applications, current limiting measures should be taken to prevent the harm of overcurrent, which has been studied in [22, 23]. This paper is not extended.
(a) Case a
(b) Case b
(c) Case c
By analyzing the above results, the control effect comparison under different control strategies is listed in Table 2. Obviously, both instantaneous power control and current balance control can only control a single target, i.e., power or current. The control scheme proposed in Ref. [20] and the control proposed in this paper can realize the coordinate control of power and current.

In order to further analyze the control performance under these two coordinate control strategies, the performance comparison is shown in Table 3. Obviously, if the proposed control strategy is adopted, the settling time will be unchanged or increased in cases a and b, but other performance indicators have been proven to be more superior.

6. Conclusion
In this paper, coordinate control of power/current for gridconnected inverter is analyzed and studied under unbalanced grid voltage. The conclusions are as follows.
(1) Instantaneous power control and current balance control cannot meet constant power and balanced current simultaneously. Therefore, it is necessary to study the coordinate control of power/current.
(2) Based on the analysis of instantaneous power control and current balance control, the references of fundamental current under instantaneous power control are equal to the current reference values under current balance control, while the contents of harmonic currents under instantaneous power control determine the harmonic contents of inverter currents. Therefore, the coordinate control of power/current can be achieved by adjusting the harmonic contents under instantaneous power control.
(3) The fundamental and harmonic currents can be controlled by PCI controller and PMCI controller, respectively. It is easy to realize in stationary reference frame without the complicated reference frame transformation and positive/negative sequence extraction calculation.
(4) The proposed control scheme does not need to detect the contents of loworder harmonics, nor does it need to use the notch filter. It is easy to realize the coordinate control of power fluctuation suppression and current balance by setting k in different conditions. The selection about the optimal value of coefficient k is the future research direction and focus.
Data Availability
(1) The threephase voltage data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article. (2) The circuit parameters (gridside inductance, resistance, and dclink voltage) data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article. (3) The controller parameters data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
Acknowledgments
The research was supported in part by the China Key R&D projects in Shaanxi (Grant no. 2017GY061).
References
 Z. Li, Y. Li, P. Wang, H. Zhu, C. Liu, and W. Xu, “Control of threephase boosttype PWM rectifier in stationary frame under unbalanced input voltage,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 2521–2530, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. C. Konstantopoulos and A. T. Alexandridis, “Fullscale modeling, control and analysis of gridconnected wind turbine induction generators with backtoback AC/DC/AC converters,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 739–748, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
 W. Jiang, W. Ma, J. Wang et al., “Deadbeat control based on current predictive correction for gridconnected converter under unbalanced grid voltage,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 64, no. 7, pp. 5479–5491, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Hu and Y. He, “Modeling and control of gridconnected voltagesourced converters under generalized unbalanced operation conditions,” IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 903–913, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Castilla, J. Miret, J. L. Sosa, J. Matas, and L. G. de Vicuña, “Gridfault control scheme for threephase photovoltaic inverters with adjustable power quality characteristics,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 2930–2940, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Miret, M. Castilla, A. Camacho, L. G. De Vicuña, and J. Matas, “Control scheme for photovoltaic threephase inverters to minimize peak currents during unbalanced gridvoltage sags,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 4262–4271, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. Guo, W. Liu, and Z. Lu, “Flexible power regulation and currentlimited control of gridconnected inverter under unbalanced grid voltage faults,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 7425–7432, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
 M. Castilla, J. Miret, A. Camacho, L. G. de Vicuna, and J. Matas, “Modeling and design of voltage support control schemes for threephase inverters operating under unbalanced grid conditions,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 6139–6150, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K.H. Kim, Y.C. Jeung, D.C. Lee, and H.G. Kim, “LVRT scheme of PMSG wind power systems based on feedback linearization,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 2376–2384, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. S. Suh and T. A. Lipo, “Control scheme in hybrid synchronous synchronous stationary frame for PWM ACDC converter under generalized unbalanced operating conditions,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 825–835, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
 H. S. Song and K. Nam, “Dual current control scheme for PWM converter under unbalanced input voltage conditions,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 953–959, 1999. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. Wang, C. Liu, and G. Li, “Control scheme for photovoltaic threephase inverters to minimize peak currents during unbalanced gridvoltage sags,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 4262–4271, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. Teodorescu, M. Liserre, and P. Rodrguez, Grid Converters for Photovoltaic and Wind Power Systems, John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., Chichester, UK, 2011.
 P. Rodriguez, A. V. Timbus, R. Teodorescu, M. Liserre, and F. Blaabjerg, “Flexible active power control of distributed power generation systems during grid faults,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 2583–2592, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. T. Lee, C. W. Hsu, and P. T. Cheng, “A lowvoltage ridethrough technique for gridconnected converters of distributed energy resources,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 1821–1832, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 W. Tao, Z. Gu, L. Wang et al., “Research on control strategy of gridconnected inverter under unbalanced voltage conditions,” in Proceedings of the Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference, pp. 915–919, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
 X. Li, Y. Tang, X. Wu et al., “Simplified multiobjective cocontrol to improve performance of threephase gridconnected inverters under unbalanced grid conditions,” Energy, Power and Transportation Electrification, pp. 1–6, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
 A. Camacho, M. Castilla, and J. Miret, “Flexible voltage support control for threephase distributed generation inverters under grid fault,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 1429–1441, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 E. Afshari, G. R. Moradi, R. Rahimi et al., “Control strategy for threephase gridconnected PV inverters enabling current limitation under unbalanced faults,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 64, no. 11, pp. 8908–8918, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. Guo, W. Liu, X. Zhang, X. Sun, Z. Lu, and J. M. Guerrero, “Flexible control strategy for gridconnected inverter under unbalanced grid faults without PLL,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 1773–1778, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. Q. Guo and W. Y. Wu, “Improved current regulation of threephase gridconnected voltagesource inverters for distributed generation systems,” IET Renewable Power Generation, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 101–115, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. M. Shabestary and A.R. I. Mohamed, “An analytical method to obtain the maximum allowable grid support by using gridconnected converters,” IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1558–1571, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Nasiri and R. Mohammadi, “Peak current limitation for grid side inverter by limited active power in PMSGbased wind turbines during different grid faults,” IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 3–12, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 Chencong Zhao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.