Modeling Public Opinion Polarization in Group Behavior by Integrating SIRS-Based Information Diffusion Process

<table class="table-group" id="tab1"><tr><td><table class="table"><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="2"><hr/></td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">XiI(t + 1)</td><td class="align_center">The attitude value of tde individual i at time t + 1 when it is in infection status I</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">XiS(t)</td><td class="align_center">The attitude value of the individual i at time t when it is in health status S</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">XiI(t)</td><td class="align_center">Individual comprehensive attitude value in infection status linked to individual i at time t</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">XjI(t)</td><td class="align_center">The attitude value of the individual j at time t when it is in infection status I</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left"><svg height="22.713pt" id="M7" style="vertical-align:-3.943499pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -18.7695 28.0236 22.713" width="28.0236pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,12.88,-14.334)"><path d="M178 262C178 297 153 323 118 323C84 323 59 297 59 262C59 225 84 201 118 201C153 201 178 225 178 262Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M748 650H522L515 622L546 617C580 611 587 604 565 575C518 513 469 451 419 393C376 474 349 534 330 580C318 609 325 612 361 618L383 622L392 650H151L144 622C214 616 224 612 257 543L360 327C270 218 187 124 159 95C106 40 92 34 26 28L17 0H252L259 28L236 31C189 37 188 47 209 78C249 136 308 210 377 294L478 79C494 44 487 37 449 32L418 28L409 0H673L680 28C596 34 591 39 554 116L436 361C526 469 574 521 604 553C659 612 669 614 739 622L748 650Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,9.945,-5.741)"><path d="M418 650H141L133 618C225 611 232 604 218 531L141 120C126 45 119 37 33 32L24 0H301L308 32C220 37 214 44 227 120L305 531C319 605 325 611 411 618L418 650Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,9.88,3.784)"><path d="M250 606C250 634 233 656 203 656C168 656 146 618 146 593C146 564 169 545 192 545C227 545 250 573 250 606ZM227 95L212 119C187 98 152 71 135 71C129 71 128 78 134 102L207 373C219 418 217 451 194 451C165 451 92 411 30 351L44 326C77 353 106 371 114 371C124 371 121 357 117 341L55 97C32 5 46 -12 70 -12C108 -12 191 51 227 95Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,14.408,0)"><path d="M300 -147C201 -63 143 98 143 270S200 602 300 686L282 710C136 610 70 450 70 271V270C70 89 136 -72 282 -170L300 -147Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,18.906,0)"><path d="M324 430H196L233 583L223 592L145 529L120 430H54L29 396L31 388H111L56 126C33 15 54 -12 77 -12C137 -12 214 57 250 95L233 119C208 92 155 59 138 59C126 59 120 70 131 125L186 390L298 394L324 430Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,23.339,0)"><path d="M275 270C275 450 212 609 64 710L45 686C145 604 203 442 203 270S147 -63 45 -147L64 -170C213 -68 275 89 275 270Z"></path></g></svg></td><td class="align_center">Indicates the average attitude value of surrounding individuals</td></tr><tr class="table-tr"><td colspan="2"><hr class="tbody-hr"/></td></tr></table></td></tr></table>

<div>Description of dynamic variables.</div>

Complexity

tab1

Table 1

Table 1: Modeling Public Opinion Polarization in Group Behavior by Integrating SIRS-Based Information Diffusion Process 