Hybrid TODIM Method with Crisp Number and Probability Linguistic Term Set for Urban Epidemic Situation Evaluation

Table 1

Data information.

	C1	C2	C3	C4	C5	C6	C7
A1	162.2	0.05	0.04	0.46	3.2	{S3(0.3), S2(0.5), S−1(0.2)}	{S3(0.9), S1(0.1)}
A2	280.1	0.09	0.03	0.22	2.4	{S3(0.5), S2(0.4)}	{S3(0.7), S1(0.3)}
A3	338.0	0.10	0.01	0.19	5.3	{S2(0.7), S1(0.2), S-2(0.1)}	{S3(0.8), S1(0.1), S0(0.1)}
A4	186.7	0.07	0.01	0.22	7.3	{S2(0.6), S1(0.3), S0(0.1)}	{S3(0.8), S2(0.1), S1(0.1)}
A5	226.5	0.11	0.03	0.12	5.2	{S2(0.5), S1(0.3), S-1(0.2)}	{S3(0.6), S2(0.4)}