Hybrid TODIM Method with Crisp Number and Probability Linguistic Term Set for Urban Epidemic Situation Evaluation

Table 2

Normalized data information.

	C1	C2	C3	C4	C5	C6	C7
A1	0.4799	1.0000	1.0000	1.0000	0.4384	{S−3(0.3), S−2(0.5), S1(0.2)}	{ S−3(0), S−3(0.9), S−1(0.1)}
A2	0.8287	0.5556	0.7500	0.4783	0.3288	{ S−3(0), s−3(0.5556), S−2(0.4444)}	{ S−3(0), S−3(0.7), S−1(0.3)}
A3	1.0000	0.5000	0.2500	0.4130	0.7260	{S−2(0.7), S−1(0.2), S2(0.1)}	{S−3(0.8), S−1(0.1), S0(0.1)}
A4	0.5524	0.7143	0.2500	0.4783	1.0000	{S−2(0.6), S−1(0.3), S0(0.1)}	{S−3(0.8), S−2(0.1), S−1(0.1)}
A5	0.6701	0.4545	0.7500	0.2609	0.7123	{S−2(0.5), S−1(0.3), S1(0.2)}	{ S−3(0), S−3(0.6), S−2(0.4)}