Learning and Adaptation for Optimization and Control of Complex Renewable Energy Systems
View this Special IssueResearch Article  Open Access
Ya Gu, Quanmin Zhu, Jicheng Liu, Peiyi Zhu, Yongxin Chou, "MultiInnovation Stochastic Gradient Parameter and State Estimation Algorithm for DualRate StateSpace Systems with Step Time Delay", Complexity, vol. 2020, Article ID 6128697, 11 pages, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6128697
MultiInnovation Stochastic Gradient Parameter and State Estimation Algorithm for DualRate StateSpace Systems with Step Time Delay
Abstract
This paper presents a multiinnovation stochastic gradient parameter estimation algorithm for dualrate sampled statespace systems with step time delay by the multiinnovation identification theory. Considering the stochastic disturbance in industrial process and using the gradient search, a multiinnovation stochastic gradient algorithm is proposed through expanding the scalar innovation into an innovation vector in order to obtain more accurate parameter estimates. The difficulty of identification is that the information vector in the identification model contains the unknown states. The proposed algorithm uses the state estimates of the observer instead of the state variables to realize the parameter estimation. The simulation results indicate that the proposed algorithm works well.
1. Introduction
The mathematical model can represent the basic features of the system, and system identification applies the statistical methods to set up the mathematical models of dynamic systems from available data [1–4]. There exist some identification methods for statespace models with and without statedelay [5, 6], such as the recursive least squares (RLS) algorithm and the stochastic gradient (SG) algorithm. The SG algorithm is used in adaptive control because of its small computation. Recently, Chen et al. presented an Aitken based the modified Kalman filtering stochastic gradient algorithm for dualrate nonlinear models [7]. Many identification methods have been developed for linear stochastic systems [8–11], bilinear stochastic systems [12–14], and nonlinear systems with colored noises [15–17].
In system identification, some algorithms concentrate on reducing the calculation amount and improving the recognition accuracy [18–20]. Since the gradient optimization method only requires calculating the firstorder derivative, its computation is small [21]. However, the calculation accuracy of the gradient algorithm is low [22]. In order to improve the calculation accuracy, many improved gradient algorithms have been proposed. Although these improved algorithms can improve the parameter estimation accuracy, the computational complexity is large. The innovation is effective information to improve the parameter estimation accuracy [23, 24]. It can promote the convergence of the algorithm in the recursive process. In order to improve the estimation accuracy through using more innovation, the multiinnovation theory has been used in system recognition.
The stabilities and identification of timedelay systems have drawn a great deal of attention of many researchers in system control and system analysis [25]. In industrial processes and control systems, time delays are difficult to avoid due to material transmission and signal interruptions. The time delay makes it difficult for the control system to respond to the input changes in time [26]. In addition, the time delay can cause instability and unsatisfactory performance of the controlled process. The recognition of timedelay systems has been a hot topic [27]. For example, Sanz et al. studied an observation and stabilization of LTV systems with timevarying measurement delay [28]. Li et al. discussed the local discontinuous Galerkin method for reactiondiffusion dynamical systems with time delays [29].
This paper studies identification problems of a dualrate statespace model with step time delay. The main contributions of this paper are as follows. The inputoutput representation is derived from a canonical statespace model of the statedelay system for the identification through eliminating the state variables in the systems, to derive a joint parameter and state estimation algorithm by means of the multiinnovation identification theory and the state observer for reducing the computational burden and improving the parameter estimation accuracy and the convergence speed.
This paper is organized as follows: Section 2 gives the canonical statespace model for statedelay systems; Section 3 introduces the identification model; Section 4 presents a combined multiinnovation stochastic gradient (MISG) parameter and state estimation algorithm; Section 5 provides an illustrative example; and finally, we offer some concluding remarks in Section 6.
2. The Canonical StateSpace Model for StateDelay Systems
Let us introduce some symbols. The relation or means that is defined as ; () stands for an identity matrix of appropriate size (); denotes a unit forward shift operator: ; represents the matrix/vector transpose; is the estimate of at time ; means that an vector whose elements are all unity; denotes the expectation operator; stands for the adjoint matrix of the square matrix : ; represents the determinant of the square matrix .
Consider the following statespace system with step statedelay:where is the system state vector, is the system input, is the system output, is a random noise with zero mean, and , , , and are the system parameter matrices/vectors. Assume that is observable and and for . The system matrices/vectors , , and are the unknown parameters to be estimated from the inputoutput data . If we remove in equation (1), then it becomes the conventional standard statespace model.
Remark 1. For the system in (1) and (2), if the state vector is known, the system matrix/vector (, ) is easy to identify. This paper considers the case that the state is completely unavailable. The objective is to propose new methods for jointly estimating the unknown states and parameters from the measurement data and to study the performance of the proposed methods.
3. The Identification Model
This section derives the identification model of the canonical statespace model in (1) and (2). From (1), we have
Let , using the properties of the shift operator , multiplying (5) by and (6) by , and adding all expressions give
When , define the information vector and the parameter vector :
When , define the information vector and the parameter vector :
Multirate systems include dualrate systems [30, 31] and nonuniformly sampled systems [32, 33] as a special cases. In the dualrate scheme, the observed output is sampled by the sampler and the sampling period is multiple of the input retention period. Assume that the sampling interval is ( is an integer), and thus, the measured inputoutput data are at the fast rate and at the slow rate. Replacing in (10) with gives
The identification model is important for parameter estimation, and many estimation algorithms have been proposed based on the identification models from observation data [34, 35] such as the gradient algorithms, the least squares algorithms, and the Newton algorithms [36].
Remark 2. This is the identification model of the dualrate statespace system with step statedelay. The information vector consists of the state vector , the input , and the correlated noise , and the parameter vector consists of the parameters , , and of the statespace model in (1) and (2).
Remark 3. In what follows, a SG algorithm is derived for the statespace system with colored noise. Furthermore, a MISG algorithm is presented to reduce the computational burden and enhance the parameter estimation accuracy. A simulation example is provided to evaluate the estimation accuracy and the computational efficiency of the proposed algorithms.
4. The Parameter and State Estimation Algorithm
This section derives a multiinnovation stochastic gradient algorithm to estimate the parameter vector in (11) and uses the observer to estimate the state vector of the system.
4.1. The SG Algorithm
Defining and minimizing the cost function,and using the gradient search principle, we may obtain a stochastic gradient algorithm:where is the stepsize or convergence factor. The choice of guarantees that the parameter estimation error converges to zero. However, difficulties arise in that the information vector contains the unknown state vector and the SG algorithm in (13) and (14) cannot compute the estimate of in (11). The approach here is to replace the unknown in with its . Based on the identification model in (11), we can obtain the following stochastic gradient parameter estimation algorithm for estimating :
When , we have
When , we have
4.2. The MISG Algorithm
In order to improve the accuracy of the SG algorithm, we extend the SG algorithm and derive a multiinnovation stochastic gradient algorithm by expanding the innovation length.
Define an innovation vector:where the positive integer represents the innovation length, and
In general, one may think that the estimate is closer to than at time . Thus, the innovation vector is taken more reasonably to be
Defining the information matrix and stacking output vector asthe innovation vector can be equivalently expressed as
Furthermore, we can obtain the following multiinnovation stochastic gradient algorithm with the innovation length :
When , we have
When , we have
When the innovation length , the MISG algorithm degrades to the SG algorithm.
Theorem 1. For the system in (11) and the MISG algorithm in (24)–(34), assume that the system noise is random noise with zero mean and variance that is uncorrelated with the input , and the mean square is bounded, that is, (A1) , ; the existence of constant and integer make the following condition: (A2) , a.s., . Then, the mean square error of the parameter estimation error given by MISG algorithm is bounded, that is, .
4.3. The State Estimation Algorithm
Using the parameter estimation vector to form the system matrices/vectors , , and and based on the canonical statespace model in (1)(2), we can use the following observer to estimate the state vector :
The proposed algorithms in this paper can combine some mathematical tools [37] and other identification methods [38–40] to investigate the parameter identification methods of other linear and nonlinear systems [41–49] and can be applied to other literature studies [50–53] such as engineering application systems.
The steps of computing the parameter estimate in (23)–(28) and the state estimate in (34)–(39) are listed in the following:(1)Let and set the initial values , , and .(2)Collect the inputoutput data and and form by (29) or (32), by (28), and by (27), respectively.(3)Compute by (25) and by (26).(4)Update the parameter estimation vector by (24).(5)Read , , and from according to the definition of .(6)Form and by (36) and (37).(7)Compute the state estimation vector by (35).(8)Increase by 1 and go to step 2, and continue the recursive calculation.
Remark 4. The flop number is used to measure the calculation efficiency (calculation amount) of a complex algorithm. The total number of four floatingpoint operations required by an algorithm is defined as its calculation amount. Based on this, the calculation efficiency of the algorithm is evaluated as a benchmark, and an efficient and economical algorithm is sought. The calculation method is necessary to analyze the performance of the proposed algorithm.
The computational efficiency of the MISG and the SG algorithms is shown in Tables 1–3. Total floatingpoint operation (flop) numbers of the MISG and the SG algorithms are and , respectively. The difference between the MISG algorithm and the SG algorithm isThus, the SG algorithm has smaller computational efforts than the MISG algorithm.



5. Example
Consider the following dualrate timedelay system with :
The parameter vector to be identified is
In simulation, the input is taken as an uncorrelated persistent excitation signal sequence with zero mean and unit variance, and as a white noise sequence with zero mean and variances and . The parameter estimation based MISG algorithm in (24)–(34) to estimate the parameter vector and the state estimation algorithm in (35)–(39) to estimate the state vector of this example system are applied. The parameter estimates and their estimation errors are shown in Tables 4 and 5 and the parameter estimation errors versus are shown in Figures 1 and 2 with , respectively, and the state estimates and versus are shown in Figures 3 and 4.


From Tables 4 and 5 and Figures 1–4, we can draw the following conclusions:(1)The parameter estimates converge fast to their true values for large , see Tables 4 and 5(2)The MISG algorithm with has higher accuracy than the SG algorithm, see Figures 1 and 2(3)The parameter estimation errors given by the MISG algorithm become smaller with the data length and the innovation length increasing, see Tables 4 and 5 and Figures 1 and 2(4)The state estimates are close to their true values with increasing, see Figures 3 and 4
6. Conclusions
This study has taken up a category of statespace models with state time delay as the research background and accordingly developed two folds of solutions for the model identification (parameter and state estimation in specific). The theoretical analysis has proved that the estimates converge to the real value under the condition of continuous excitation in modelling. The algorithms used in this paper can be applied to hybrid switched impulsive power networks and uncertain chaotic nonlinear systems with time delay [54–57] and can be applied to other literature studies [58–64]. The simulation case study has demonstrated that the proposed algorithms/procedures are effective and efficient in design and implementation.
Data Availability
No data were used to support this study.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 61903050 and 61673277), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (no. BK20181033), the Natural Science Fundamental Research Project of Colleges and Universities in Jiangsu Province (no. 18KJB120001), the Science and Technology Development Plan Project of Changshu under grant no. CR201711, and Jiangsu Planned Projects for Postdoctoral Research Funds.
References
 F. Ding, G. Liu, and X. P. Liu, “Parameter estimation with scarce measurements,” Automatica, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 1646–1655, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. Wang, S. Zhang, M. Gan, and J. Qiu, “A novel EM identification method for Hammerstein systems with missing output data,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 2500–2508, 2020. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Li, X. Liu, and F. Ding, “The filteringbased maximum likelihood iterative estimation algorithms for a special class of nonlinear systems with autoregressive moving average noise using the hierarchical identification principle,” International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 1189–1211, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Ding, “Hierarchical multiinnovation stochastic gradient algorithm for Hammerstein nonlinear system modeling,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 1694–1704, 2013. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Ding, “State filtering and parameter estimation for state space systems with scarce measurements,” Signal Processing, vol. 104, pp. 369–380, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Ding, “Combined state and least squares parameter estimation algorithms for dynamic systems,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 403–412, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Chen, Y. Zhang, Q. Zhu, and Y. Liu, “Aitken based modified Kalman filtering stochastic gradient algorithm for dualrate nonlinear models,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, vol. 356, no. 8, pp. 4732–4746, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Ding, J. Chen, J. Lin, and L. Wan, “Particle filtering based parameter estimation for systems with outputerror type model structures,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, vol. 356, no. 10, pp. 5521–5540, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Ding, J. Chen, J. Lin, and G. Jiang, “Particle filteringbased recursive identification for controlled autoregressive systems with quantised output,” IET Control Theory & Applications, vol. 13, no. 14, pp. 2181–2187, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Gu, J. Liu, X. Li, Y. Chou, and Y. Ji, “State space model identification of multirate processes with timedelay using the expectation maximization,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, vol. 356, no. 3, pp. 1623–1639, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Gu, Y. Chou, J. Liu, and Y. Ji, “Moving horizon estimation for multirate systems with timevarying timedelays,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, vol. 356, no. 4, pp. 2325–2345, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Li and X. Liu, “The least squares based iterative algorithms for parameter estimation of a bilinear system with autoregressive noise using the data filtering technique,” Signal Processing, vol. 147, pp. 23–34, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. Zhang and F. Ding, “Hierarchical parameter and state estimation for bilinear systems,” International Journal of Systems Science, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 275–290, 2020. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Li and X. Liu, “Maximum likelihood least squares based iterative estimation for a class of bilinear systems using the data filtering technique,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 1581–1592, 2020. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Ding, Z. Cao, J. Chen, and G. Jiang, “Weighted parameter estimation for hammerstein nonlinear ARX systems,” Circuits, Systems, and Signal Processing, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 2178–2192, 2020. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Ding, X. P. Liu, and G. Liu, “Identification methods for Hammerstein nonlinear systems,” Digital Signal Processing, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 215–238, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Gan, G.Y. Chen, L. Chen, and C. L. P. Chen, “Term selection for a class of separable nonlinear models,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 445–451, 2020. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Ding, L. Xu, D. D. Meng et al., “Gradient estimation algorithms for the parameter identification of bilinear systems using the auxiliary model,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 369, 2020. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. Wang, L. Li, Y. Ji, and Y. Yan, “Model recovery for Hammerstein systems using the auxiliary model based orthogonal matching pursuit method,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, vol. 54, pp. 537–550, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. Y. Chen, M. Gan, C. L. P. Chen, and H. X. Li, “Basis function matrix based flexible coefficient autoregressive models: a framework for time series and nonlinear system modeling,” IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 2019, In press. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Ding, L. Lv, J. Pan, X. Wan, and X.B. Jin, “Twostage gradientbased iterative estimation methods for controlled autoregressive systems using the measurement data,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 886–896, 2020. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Chen, J. Li, and Y. Liu, “Gradient iterative algorithm for dualrate nonlinear systems based on a novel particle filter,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, vol. 354, no. 11, pp. 4425–4437, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Pan, X. Jiang, X. Wan, and W. Ding, “A filtering based multiinnovation extended stochastic gradient algorithm for multivariable control systems,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 1189–1197, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Ding, X. Zhang, and L. Xu, “The innovation algorithms for multivariable statespace models,” International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 1601–1618, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C. Y. Dong, S. F. Yang, H. J. Jia, and P. Wang, “Padebased stability analysis for a modular multilevel converter considering the time delay in the digital control system,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 66, no. 7, pp. 5242–5253, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. Z. Yong, M. Zhu, and E. Frazzoli, “Simultaneous input and state estimation for linear timevarying continuoustime stochastic systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 2531–2538, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Chen, B. Huang, F. Ding, and Y. Gu, “Variational Bayesian approach for ARX systems with missing observations and varying timedelays,” Automatica, vol. 94, pp. 194–204, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. Sanz, P. García, and M. Krstic, “Observation and stabilization of LTV systems with timevarying measurement delay,” Automatica, vol. 103, pp. 573–579, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. Li, C. Zhang, and H. Qin, “LDG method for reactiondiffusion dynamical systems with time delay,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 217, no. 22, pp. 9173–9181, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Liu, F. Ding, and Y. Shi, “An efficient hierarchical identification method for general dualrate sampleddata systems,” Automatica, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 962–970, 2014. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Ding, F. Ding, X. P. Liu, and G. Liu, “Hierarchical least squares identification for linear SISO systems with dualrate sampleddata,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 56, no. 11, pp. 2677–2683, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Ding, G. Liu, and X. P. Liu, “Partially coupled stochastic gradient identification methods for nonuniformly sampled systems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 1976–1981, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Ding, L. Qiu, and T. Chen, “Reconstruction of continuoustime systems from their nonuniformly sampled discretetime systems,” Automatica, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 324–332, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. Xu, L. Chen, and W. Xiong, “Parameter estimation and controller design for dynamic systems from the step responses based on the Newton iteration,” Nonlinear Dynamics, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 2155–2163, 2015. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. Xu, “The damping iterative parameter identification method for dynamical systems based on the sine signal measurement,” Signal Processing, vol. 120, pp. 660–667, 2016. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. Xu, W. Xiong, A. Alsaedi, and T. Hayat, “Hierarchical parameter estimation for the frequency response based on the dynamical window data,” International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 1756–1764, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Wang, G. Zhuang, and F. Chen, “A dynamic eventtriggered H∞ control for singular Markov jump systems with redundant channels,” International Journal of Systems Science, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 158–179, 2020. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. Zhang, F. Ding, L. Xu, and E. Yang, “Highly computationally efficient state filter based on the delta operator,” International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 875–889, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. Zhang and F. Ding, “Adaptive parameter estimation for a general dynamical system with unknown states,” International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 1351–1372, 2020. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Wang, G. Zhuang, X. Chen, Z. Wang, and F. Chen, “Dynamic eventbased finitetime mixed H∞ and passive asynchronous filtering for TS fuzzy singular Markov jump systems with general transition rates,” Nonlinear Analysis: Hybrid Systems, vol. 36, Article ID 100874, 2020. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Chang, G. Zhai, B. Fu, and L. Xiong, “Quadratic stabilization of switched uncertain linear systems: a convex combination approach,” IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 1116–1126, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Chang, C. Sun, and Y. Qiu, “Effective notch stress method for fatigue assessment of sheet alloy material and bimaterial welded joints,” ThinWalled Structures, vol. 151, Article ID 106745, 2020. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. Geng and R. B. Xiao, “Control and backbone identification for the resilient recovery of a supply network utilizing outer synchronization,” Applied Sciences, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 313, 2020. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. He, H. Lin, Q. Zou, and D. Zhang, “Accurate measurement of pavement deflection velocity under dynamic loads,” Automation in Construction, vol. 83, pp. 149–162, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. Wang, B. Feng, Y. Wang, T. Wu, and H. Lin, “Bidirectional shortcircuit current blocker for DC microgrid based on solidstate circuit breaker,” Electronics, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 306, 2020. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. Wang, J. Guo, C. Xu, T. Wu, and H. Lin, “Hybrid model predictive control strategy of supercapacitor energy storage system based on double active bridge,” Energies, vol. 12, no. 11, p. 2134, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 T. Wu, F. Ye, Y. Su, Y. Wang, and S. Riffat, “Coordinated control strategy of DC microgrid with hybrid energy storage system to smooth power output fluctuation,” International Journal of LowCarbon Technologies, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 46–54, 2020. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Zhang, M. Huang, T. Wu, and F. Ji, “Reconfigurable equilibrium circuit with additional power supply,” International Journal of LowCarbon Technologies, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 106–111, 2020. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Xing, J. Na, and R. CostaCastello, “Realtime adaptive parameter estimation for a polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 6048–6057, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. Wang, L. Mao, and F. Ding, “Recasted modelsbased hierarchical extended stochastic gradient method for MIMO nonlinear systems,” IET Control Theory & Applications, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 476–485, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. Yang, Z. Chen, Y. Li, and Z. Su, “Rapid relocation method for mobile robot based on improved ORBSLAM2 algorithm,” Remote Sensing, vol. 11, no. 2, Article ID 149, p. 149, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Z. Su, Y. Li, and G. Yang, “Dietary composition perception algorithm using social robot audition for Mandarin Chinese,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 8768–8782, 2020. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. Lv, S. Tang, and L. Zhang, “Parametric solutions to generalized periodic Sylvester bimatrix equations,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, vol. 357, no. 6, pp. 3601–3621, 2020. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 D. Wang, Y. Yan, Y. Liu, and J. Ding, “Model recovery for Hammerstein systems using the hierarchical orthogonal matching pursuit method,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 345, pp. 135–145, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 T. Zhang and F. Ma, “Improved rough KMeans clustering algorithm based on weighted distance measure with Gaussian function,” International Journal of Computer Mathematics, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 663–675, 2017. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Gan, C. L. P. Chen, G.Y. Chen, and L. Chen, “On some separated algorithms for separable nonlinear least squares problems,” IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 2866–2874, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. Y. Chen, M. Gan, C. L. P. Chen, and H. X. Li, “A regularized variable projection algorithm for separable nonlinear least squares problems,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 526–537, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 T. F. Zhang, F. M. Ma, D. Yue, C. Peng, and G. M. P. O’Hare, “Interval type2 fuzzy local enhancement based rough Kmeans clustering considering imbalanced clusters,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2019, In press. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. Ma, M. Ding, T. Zhang, and J. Cao, “Compressed binary discernibility matrix based incremental attribute reduction algorithm for group dynamic data,” Neurocomputing, vol. 344, pp. 20–27, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Na, Y. S. Xing, and R. CostaCastell, “Adaptive estimation of timevarying parameters with application to rotomagnet plant,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2018, In press. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 N. Zhao, Y.C. Liang, D. Niyato, Y. Pei, M. Wu, and Y. Jiang, “Deep reinforcement learning for user association and resource allocation in heterogeneous cellular networks,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 5141–5152, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Zhang, X. Li, G. Zhao, B. Lu, and C. C. Cavalcante, “Signal reconstruction of compressed sensing based on alternating direction method of multipliers,” Circuits, Systems, and Signal Processing, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 307–323, 2020. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. Wang, H. Liu, L. V. Dai, and Y. W. Liu, “Novel method for identifying fault location of mixed lines,” Energies, vol. 11, no. 6, Article ID 1529, 2018. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 H. Liu, Q. Zou, and Z. Zhang, “Energy disaggregation of appliances consumptions using ham approach,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 185977–185990, 2019. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 Ya Gu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.