Research Article
Deep Adaptive Adversarial Network-Based Method for Mechanical Fault Diagnosis under Different Working Conditions
Table 1
Classification results in Experiment 1.
| Method | A ⟶ B | B ⟶ A | B ⟶ C | C ⟶ B | A ⟶ C | C ⟶ A | Average |
| SAE | 73.25 ± 1.48% | 71.19 ± 2.01% | 74.12 ± 3.17% | 62.64 ± 3.51% | 46.45 ± 4.97% | 43.53 ± 4.35% | 60.20 | TCA | 92.05 ± 2.94% | 88.24 ± 3.13% | 85.19 ± 2.47% | 83.57 ± 1.94% | 72.51 ± 5.35% | 67.63 ± 6.20% | 81.53 | DANN | 95.24 ± 1.54% | 93.45 ± 1.71% | 89.34 ± 2.84% | 87.84 ± 2.64% | 79.78 ± 4.40% | 75.64 ± 4.21% | 86.88 | MK-MMD | 98.04 ± 0.12% | 96.87 ± 0.88% | 95.84 ± 1.54% | 96.14 ± 1.75% | 91.97 ± 1.58% | 90.54 ± 1.96% | 94.90 | SFDA | 97.85 ± 0.25% | 95.87 ± 1.04% | 92.82 ± 0.85% | 94.35% ± 1.09% | 89.45 ± 0.83% | 86.55 ± 2.04% | 92.82 | DAAN | 98.63 ± 0.63% | 97.25 ± 0.90% | 97.02 ± 1.68% | 96.41 ± 1.86% | 92.34 ± 2.65% | 90.98 ± 3.21% | 95.44 |
|
|