[Retracted] Research on the Path and Effect Evaluation of Students’ Quality Improvement in Private Colleges
Table 3
Questionnaire feedback from students of holistic education courses.
Number
Investigation items
2016-2017 school year
2019-2020 school year
A (%)
B (%)
C (%)
D (%)
A (%)
B (%)
C (%)
D (%)
1
Overall evaluation of holistic education courses: A: be willing to learn and be rewarding; B: quite satisfied; C: not interested; D: poor course quality
84
10
4
2
94
3
2
1
2
Does the curriculum achieve the goal: A: achieves the goal better; B: achieves the goal poorly; C: fails to achieve the goal; D: academic burden
70
4
20
6
84
1
10
5
3
Course attendance rate: A: never absent from work; B: determined by the teacher’s roll call; C: do not go when there are special circumstances; D: never go
83
12
4
1
92
7
1
0
4
Whether to support the opening of holistic education courses in our school: A: support; B: oppose; C: does not matter
73
15
12
0
89
4
7
0
5
Evaluation of teachers’ teaching style: A: very satisfied; B: relatively satisfied; C: dissatisfied; D: hope to strengthen
79
15
4
2
86
12
1
1
6
Evaluation of teachers’ ideological and moral realm: A: very satisfied; B: relatively satisfied; C: dissatisfied; D: hope to strengthen
74
17
3
6
82
12
1
5
7
Evaluation of teachers’ professional theoretical skills: A: very satisfied; B: relatively satisfied; C: not satisfied; D: hope to strengthen
82
16
0
2
86
14
0
0
8
Overall evaluation of teachers of holistic education courses: A: excellent; B: good; C: qualified; D: unqualified
81
17
2
0
88
11
1
0
9
Have you gained something from holistic education courses: A: gained more; B: gained; C: general; D: no gain
