Research Article
Vibration Reliability Analysis of Drum Brake Using the Artificial Neural Network and Important Sampling Method
Table 2
Comparison of the reliability index and POF from different reliability analysis methods with an ANN sample size of 200.
| Method | Reliability index | POF | Number of samples (N1) | Relative error (%) |
| MCS | 3.3834 | 3.58 E − 04 | 1 E + 7 | — | AFOSM | 3.3497 | 4.05 E − 04 | — | 12.989 | IS | 3.3833 | 3.58 E − 04 | 1 E + 4 | 0.0146 | BP-MCS | 3.3803 | 3.62 E − 04 | 1 E + 7 | 1.1173 | BP-AFOSM | 3.3482 | 4.07 E − 04 | — | 13.607 | BP-IS | 3.3878 | 3.52 E − 04 | 1 E + 4 | 1.5901 | RBF-MCS | 3.3872 | 3.53 E − 04 | 1 E + 7 | 1.3966 | RBF-AFOSM | 3.3501 | 4.04 E − 04 | — | 12.804 | RBF-IS | 3.3829 | 3.59 E − 04 | 1 E + 4 | 0.1528 |
|
|