Research Article
Vibration Reliability Analysis of Drum Brake Using the Artificial Neural Network and Important Sampling Method
Table 3
Comparison of the reliability index and POF from different reliability analysis methods with an ANN sample size of 300.
| Method | Reliability index | POF | Number of samples (N1) | Relative error (%) |
| MCS | 3.3834 | 3.58 E − 04 | 1 E + 7 | — | AFOSM | 3.3497 | 4.05 E − 04 | — | 12.989 | IS | 3.3833 | 3.58 E − 04 | 1 E + 4 | 0.0146 | BP-MCS | 3.3826 | 3.59 E − 04 | 1 E + 7 | 0.2793 | BP-AFOSM | 3.3491 | 4.05 E − 04 | — | 13.251 | BP-IS | 3.3847 | 3.56 E − 04 | 1 E + 4 | 0.4791 | RBF-MCS | 3.3841 | 3.57 E − 04 | 1 E + 7 | 0.2793 | RBF-AFOSM | 3.3497 | 4.05 E − 04 | — | 13.001 | RBF-IS | 3.3834 | 3.58 E − 04 | 1 E + 4 | 0.0058 |
|
|