Research Article
Vibration Reliability Analysis of Drum Brake Using the Artificial Neural Network and Important Sampling Method
Table 5
Comparison of the reliability index and POF from different reliability analysis methods with an ANN sample size of 100.
| Method | Reliability index | POF | Number of samples (N1) | Relative error (%) |
| MCS | 3.3989 | 3.383 E − 04 | 1 E + 7 | — | AFOSM | 3.4131 | 3.211 E − 04 | — | 5.0750 | IS | 3.4001 | 3.368 E − 04 | 1 E + 4 | 0.4570 | BP-MCS | 3.3970 | 3.406 E − 04 | 1 E + 7 | 0.6799 | BP-AFOSM | 3.4117 | 3.228 E − 04 | — | 4.5786 | BP-IS | 3.4011 | 3.356 E − 04 | 1 E + 4 | 0.8020 | RBF-MCS | 3.3978 | 3.390 E − 04 | 1 E + 7 | 0.2069 | RBF-AFOSM | 3.4163 | 3.174 E − 04 | — | 6.1779 | RBF-IS | 3.3993 | 3.378 E − 04 | 1 E + 4 | 0.1546 |
|
|