Research Article
Vibration Reliability Analysis of Drum Brake Using the Artificial Neural Network and Important Sampling Method
Table 6
Comparison of the reliability index and POF from different reliability analysis methods with an ANN sample size of 200.
| Method | Reliability index | POF | Number of samples (N1) | Relative error (%) |
| MCS | 3.3989 | 3.383 E − 04 | 1 E + 7 | — | AFOSM | 3.4131 | 3.211 E − 04 | — | 5.0750 | IS | 3.4001 | 3.368 E − 04 | 1 E + 4 | 0.4570 | BP-MCS | 3.3987 | 3.385 E − 04 | 1 E + 7 | 0.0591 | BP-AFOSM | 3.4125 | 3.218 E − 04 | — | 4.8719 | BP-IS | 3.3983 | 3.391 E − 04 | 1 E + 4 | 0.2310 | RBF-MCS | 3.3991 | 3.380 E − 04 | 1 E + 7 | 0.0887 | RBF-AFOSM | 3.4127 | 3.217 E − 04 | — | 4.9172 | RBF-IS | 3.3989 | 3.382 E − 04 | 1 E + 4 | 0.0279 |
|
|