Lightweight Cryptographic Algorithms for Guessing Attack Protection in Complex Internet of Things Applications

Table 5

Comparative analysis of conventional and lightweight cryptography algorithms.

Algorithm	Block size (in bits)	Key size (in bits)	No. of rounds	Structure	Year published
Conventional algorithms
DES Wong (Wark and Dawson, 1998)	64	56	16	FN	1975
3DES (Patil et al. 2016)	64	168/112/56	48	FN	1998
AES (Daemen and Rijmen, 2013)	128	128/192/256	10/12/14	SPN	2001
Blowfish (Singh and Singh, 2013)	64	32-448	16	FN	1993
Lightweight algorithms
PRESENT (Bogdanov et al. 2007)	64	80/128	32	SPN	2007
Clefia (Shirai et al. 2007)	128	128/192/256	18/22/26	FN	2007
HIGHT (Hong et al. 2006)	64	128	32	FN	2016
RECTANGLE (Zhang et al. 2015)	64	80/128	25	SPN	2015
PICO (Bansod et al. 2016)	64	80/128	32	SPN	2016
BORON (Bansod et al. 2017)	64	80/128	25	SPN	2017