#### Abstract

We examine the comportment of the global trajectory of a piecewisely conceived single species population growth model. Formulation relies on what we develop as the principle of limiting factors for population growth, adapted from the law of the minimum of Liebig and the law of the tolerance of Shelford. The ensuing paradigm sets natality and mortality rates to express through extreme values of population growth determining factor. Dynamics through time occur over different growth phases. Transition points are interpreted as thresholds of viability, starvation, and intraspecific competition. In this delivery, we focus on the qualitative study of the global trajectory expressed on continuous time and on exploring the feasibility of analytical results against data on populations growing under experimental or natural conditions. All study cases sustained fittings of high reproducibility both at empirical and interpretative slants. Possible phase configurations include regimes with multiple stable equilibria, sigmoidal growth, extinction, or stationarity. Here, we also outline that the associating discrete-time piecewise model composes the logistic map applied over a particular region of the phase configuration. Preliminary exploratory analysis suggests that the logistic map’s chaos onset could surpass once the orbit enters a contiguous phase region.

#### 1. Introduction

As a rule, mathematical models that attempt to describe the dynamics of two or more populations, subject to a specific type of interaction in an ecosystem, are formulated based on too rigid hypotheses, resulting in poor concordance of the model’s predictions with the natural process. The high degree of complexity of biological phenomena and their significant spatial-temporal variations do not assimilate by single-rule models, which are incapable of presenting the functional diversity required by levels of reliable prediction. However, when trying to include more biological information in the model hypotheses, it is often possible to fall into the opposite situation: creating models or techniques so complicated that they are also inoperative from an analytical standpoint.

From the traditional point of view, in building a model, it is necessary to include the most representative processes of the system that we are trying to describe to maintain simplicity as much as possible without losing relevant information. The problem reduces to a quest for those key processes that govern the interaction dynamics we are interested in studying. For example, in demographic ecology, the dynamics of a population depend on the correlation between opposing influences such as birth generating and growth inhibitory processes. Each of these effects depends on a series of factors inherent to population growth. For example, births depend on age composition, sex proportion, fertility, available food, and so on. Correspondingly, the growth inhibition process may be set by population density, disease, abiotic factors such as temperature, humidity, pollution, and others. As the number of determining factors increases, the model’s complexity affects tractability and interpretability. An alternative approach is considering a horizontal integration of complexity through a piecewise modeling strategy. While embracing this approach to gain interpretative strength, it would be desirable to imbue the construct of a mechanistic profile. This work explains how we build a piecewise population model (PPM) by following a systematic way, that is, creating a piecewise description of population growth by relying upon a logical deductive approach. An ad hoc logical system that could sustain such an enterprise is what we comprehend as a principle of limiting factors (PLF) for population growth. This paradigm entailed the derivation of a PPM as a collection of submodels called growth phases that continuously compose the global trend of population size. Each growth phase describes the dynamics over a specific time interval. The naming composite further refers to the principle of limiting factors-driven piecewise population model, which also represents utilizing the PLF-PPM acronym.

As we elucidate in what follows, the PLF-PPM can be arranged by following ideas in [1–3]. Mainly, the construct presented here reviews the approach in [3] to consider a modification taking into account the abatement effect that the population induces on an external resource necessary to guarantee its growth and permanence. The present PLF-PPM formulation also includes a specific scaling or weighting of population size to model the increase in mortality promoted by low population densities [4]. The resulting device allows meaningful ecological interpretation of consequential growth phases. Mainly for keeping this paper’s extension manageable, we focus on the continuous-time form of the PLF-PPM. Nevertheless, we judged that it is pertinent to advance an outline of the next discrete-time version, whose detailed exploration will be addressed in the second part of this work. We include several study cases that show the empirical and interpretative adequacy of the present paradigm. The Appendix presents a qualitative study of associating continuous-time global trajectory.

#### 2. Materials and Methods

##### 2.1. The General Piecewise Population Growth Model Setup

Throughout this paper, symbol stands for the set of real numbers and denotes the subset of whose elements are positive. Correspondingly, the size of a population at a positive time represents employing and formally stands as a function having domain and range , a proper subset of , that is, . For the case of an isolated population, a customary assumption establishes the existence of a function such thatwhere stands for the rate of change of the number of individuals in the population at time . The function is interpreted as an average estimate of the influence of all the processes that govern population growth. More specifically, this function embodies the average growth rate for each individual in the population. In the following, we will refer to as the per capita growth rate or the intrinsic growth rate of .

Determining the function in a closed form is usually impossible or very complicated. However, from an empirical perspective, it is possible to suppose that the function admits expansion as a power series, with which we would obtain

Then, for example, neglecting the terms with , we could consider the approximation

The above characterization of the intrinsic growth rate establishes the form of the differential equation (1) that leads to the identification of the so-called logistic curve, commonly adopted as a model of population growth in a limited environment. Although it is feasible to give a biological interpretation to equation (3) model, it shows the fragility inherent in all simplified models, which mainly relates to the lack of suitable complexity. Moreover, the variation of population size could compose an outstanding array of patterns. Then, maintaining a single association rule for , through the full extension of no matter how complex such a rule conceives, it could render insufficient to imbue a consistent reproducibility of observed population values. A traditional approach to adapt is by considering a polynomial approximation of degree derived from the infinite series of equation (2). Nevertheless, this approach bears a disadvantage since at gaining reproducibility strength, we could lose interpretability.

Before getting into matters on suitable complexity embedding of, we introduce some notation conventions. Given a function and a subset , the restriction of to the set, denotes , it is formally defined by

A second method of adapting the complexity attending to an optimal reproducibility criterion is conceiving as a composite of operating modes, each one characterized by a continuous and differentiable function being a region defined throughfor . The components of the vector represent breakpoints for transition among the operating modes . We also assume that the collection of regions provides a covering for the range of , that is, . We could formally set

So, we can represent expanded by the submodels for namely,with representing the characteristic function of , namely,

Equation (7) intends to provide a piecewise description of the intrinsic population growth rate in the autonomous differential equation (1). Discretizing the resulting differential equation, we can identify the parameters defining the submodels describing the phases of population growth, as well as the threshold parameters that represent the transition points between the growth phases ; given assumed continuity properties of , the phase changes must be set as continuous transitions between the submodels, that is, we have

But, in the general settings, the transition between phases at breakpoints can occur in a discontinuous way.

In the settings of the model of equation (1), the function is interpreted as the natural growth rate of the population. Then, defining for and keeping the notation convention entailing the associated domain regions, according to equation (6), we set

This way, we can propose a piecewise expanded form of equation (1), namely,where and are defined by equations (5) and (8) one to one.

The non-autonomous form of the dynamical system of equation (11) addresses similarly by replacing by a continuous and differentiable function and interprets and as a forced form of the natural growth rate of the population The extension of equation (11) to the non-autonomous case follows by setting submodel : being for . This way, a piecewisely expanded non-autonomous form of equation (11) could be expressed bywhere symbolizes the characteristic function of the rectangle . Nevertheless, in this paper, we focus on the autonomous case.

To provide a piecewise representation of the solution to the dynamical system of equation (11), we conceive trajectory sectors for defined by

For , the interval . Since varies continuously, we must set the consistency conditionfor being the breakpoint for the transition from to . Then, we arrangewith being defined by

In any event, usually assembling equation (11) relies on an empirical description that abides by the highest reproducibility criterion. Regularly, such an approach disregards any phenomenological explanation of population growth. In this work, we explain a systematic way to obtain a collection of submodels that mimic the global trend of population size , where each one of them describes the dynamics over a specific time interval, that is, we build a piecewise description of both and as given by equations (11) and (13) one to one by relying on a logical deductive approach. This can be obtained by following [1–3]. The corresponding derivation is based on the use of the ecological principle of limiting factors. The construct presented here corresponds to a modification of the slant in [3]. To consider the abatement effect that the population induces on an external resource necessary to guarantee its growth and permanence, the present formulation also includes a specific scaling or weighting of population size to model the increase in mortality promoted by low population densities [4].

##### 2.2. The Principle of Limiting Factors

German Physiologist Justus Von Liebig [5], studying the growth of certain plants, realized that to guarantee their development, there had to be a set of essential nutrients. Some had to be abundant, and others were required only in small quantities. A significant discovery of Liebig was that the absence of some nutrient could not be replaced with any other that appeared in abundance. Moreover, a medium that contained all the nutrients in abundance except one of them, which appeared in insufficient quantity, would allow plant growth until the nutrient was utterly depleted. The absence of some element limited growth. In addition, when growth occurred, the latter turned out to be controlled by the nutrient appearing in lesser proportion. Liebig called this regularity the law of the minimum. Later, in [6], the North American Ecologist V. E. Shelford extended the domain of Liebig’s law to what is now known as the law of tolerance. Shelford pointed out that when there is an excess of a specific element, this can be as limiting as its deficiency. It follows that all the processes that determine the dynamics of a population will occur in intensities governed by the minima or maxima of the factors that nourish these processes. We refer to this notion as the principle of limiting factors (PLF) for simplicity and following the tradition. It intends to interpret the law that limits a process through the maximum and minimum of factors acting in the analyzed system.

##### 2.3. The Principle of Limiting Factors-Driven Piecewise Population Growth Model

Considering the validity of the principle of limiting factors, let us construct a mathematical model to interpret the performance of a population whose size at time is denoted by . We suppose that departing from a value , the population growth depends on an external resource whose availability at time is modeled by a continuous and differentiable function with rank in . We will also assume that the natural growth rate of the population size as given by equation (2) expresses through a function that determines on a first instance by the intensities of two opposing processes, one of birth yielding offspring and another determining the death of the individuals, that is,where and are positive scaling parameters [2, 3], stands for the strength of the process leading to increasing population size, that is, the rate at which the number of newborn in the population is generated, and represents the intensity of the growth-inhibiting process, that is, the mortality rate. We assume that and both express through continuous and differentiable functions.

Then, according to the principle of limiting factors, we assume that depends essentially on two factors: one being the size of the population and the second one taken as the amount of feeding energy available; this symbolized employing . We suppose that before the population began exhausting the resource , this is kept at a constant value . Additionally, we think through that the total weight of the population expresses in the same units of energy as . Let us also undertake that each individual in the pool maintains an energy consumption equal to a proportion of its weight. Then, we can assume in the first instance that represents using the linear model

Then, resource availability will plentifully suit feeding requirements of the initial population whenever the condition satisfies or equivalently according to equation (18) whenever holds. We will then have that if the amount of energy consumed by the population at time , i.e., , is less than , there will be enough food for all individuals, that is, the availability of energy will guarantee that the population can participate in the reproduction process unrestrictedly, so we can establish the assumption that the birth rate will be proportional to the size of the population, that is, we can set the equality . In the case in which exceeds , then only as many individuals of the population energetically equivalent to will be able to feed. Therefore, the reproductive potential of the population will be limited. That is, according to Liebig’s principle, energy availability will be a limiting factor for population growth. Then, . Thus, we can define by

Solving the inequality , we can express equation (19) in the equivalent formwhere the constant is interpreted as a starvation threshold since if grows maintaining levels higher than , the number of offspring will turn to be controlled by the external factor and the rate of individual energy consumption that could eventually lead to the decline of the population.

Concerning the intensity of the natural death process , we will consider this, considering Shelford’s law of tolerance based on population density as the critical factor. According to Allee’s principle, reduced population levels will restrict the number of interactions between individuals, making mating difficult, implying decreasing recruitment, favoring even a lower number of individuals, and eventually leading to the total depletion of the population. In this circumstance, we will say that the strength of the mortality process will be proportional to the size of the population, that is, , where is a positive constant. On the other hand, at high population sizes, density upsurges, the struggle for resources intensifies, and so does the transmission of diseases, thereby increasing mortality. In this case, we take the intensity of the mortality process as being proportional to the number of encounters between the individuals, that is, where . Then, according to Shelford’s law of tolerance, we can express in the form

In summary, the PLF and equations (11) and (17) imply the piecewise continuous formwhere and are given bywith representing the characteristic function of for (cf. equation (8)). In what follows, the principle of limiting factors-driven piecewise population growth model of equations (22) and (23) will be referred to as PLF-PPM for short.

Since stands for the solution to equation (22), then according to equation (15), we have that for stands for the sector of the PLF driven trajectory having range in , and correspondingly, this sets . Then, solves the differential equation with satisfying and the restriction . Therefore, we havewith being the equilibrium solutions as determined by the natural growth rates (cf. equation (24)). Additionally, the submodels composing the solution as given by equation (15) determine by the order relationship that and satisfy. Accordingly, the global trajectory could fit to three possible topologies, one type associating to the statement , another form consistent to ; and a third form associating to the phase composite for models will include regions ,, and , that is, . Correspondingly, for models , phase arrangement becomes . In turn, phase portrait for models and the regions and is mutually exclusive. For models , the phase combination turns to . The Appendix presents a qualitative study of trajectories resulting from equation (22).

#### 3. Results

##### 3.1. Analytic Exploration

To study the varied forms of the global trajectory derived from the PLF-PM, we begin by setting the array of possible phase configurations associated with the basic parameters and (cf. equations (22) and (23)). We depart from the ordering relationship for the external energy and the ratio of mortality from population density proportions, , that yields a first model type classification . We have to consider models associated to the inequality , where the range of composes the regions: , , and (cf. equation (23)). For model type where the relationship holds, the range of will be divided into the regions , and (cf. equation (23)). For model type linking to the ordering , the range of will be divided into the regions and . We can be aware that regions and are mutually excluding. Besides, it also requires classifying possible phase arrangements according to a Birth to Mortality Scaled Ordering , namely, : when , : if , and : whenever . Additionally, each model type with determines possible placements of the initial condition, and each one associated to composing phase regions with determines an initial condition ordering , namely, : for (), : whenever , : when , : if , and : whenever . Correspondingly, : for , : whenever , : when : if , and : whenever . The possible phase arrangements typify according to a three-dimensional conjunction operator for and as specified. Table 1 summarizes phase arrangements for model type , and Table 2 summarizes those corresponding to model type . In addition to the conjunctions, we must consider the positioning of the equilibrium solutions inside their associated regions. For this reason, in the presentation of results, we could use the indicator for designating equilibrium and describing region . Then, for instance, identifies the placement of equilibrium inside region ; correspondingly, labels positioning of inside region and so on. Yet given , this relates to distinguishing how the initial condition is positioned relative to the equilibrium solution . Resulting orderings generically symbolize through for associated to the equilibrium solution and labeling the ordering of relative to . This way, stands for and stands for . Besides described symbols, we could refer to direct inequalities that a given equilibrium satisfies relative to thresholds defining regions.

Then, for instance, the statement signifies that we have a model type with and that the initial condition satisfies , the equilibrium in region , that is, , and finally that . In the Appendix, we present an extended qualitative study of the performance of the global trajectory under conjunctions .

Figure 1(a) shows the performance of the PLF-PM composite trajectory for the configuration. Particularly, shown placement derives from the auxiliary ordering . The global trajectory initiates in a region according to the rule. Then, since for population size decreases, continuity of linked trajectory projects a time such that reaches the threshold, that is, and then enters into the region switching to the rule. The settings imply the existence of a second time so that touches the frontier, thereby getting into the region and following according to the rule. But, since , eventually vanishes. and configurations similarly tied to the ordering also drive population size to vanish Figure 1(b) pertains to the arrangement. Composite trajectory begins in the region according to the rule, but , and then population size decreases, so at a time , it reaches the threshold, that is, , entering into the region and subsequently abiding by the rule . The decreasing trend implies population size touching the boundary at a second time , thereby placing within the region and then switching again, this time to the rule. Afterward, population size keeps decreasing following an asymptotic trend to extinction. The faith of the PLF-PM composite trajectory for and is extinction equally. Figure 1(c) pertains to the conjunction corresponding to the ordering. Then, in the beginning, population size places in the region and decreases according to the rule. Subsequently, it asymptotically approaches the value , but on its trend, it hits the boundary at time switching to rule holding in region . The condition drives population to extinction. For conjunction, the initial condition placement keeps the population size within region where it progresses to extinction according to the trajectory.

**(a)**

**(b)**

**(c)**

**(a)**

**(b)**

**(c)**

**(d)**

**(a)**

**(b)**

**(c)**

**(d)**

Assume ; then, the condition holds; additionally, the equilibrium localizes above , that is, , and these orderings appear in conjunction with and . Particularly, implies so the initial condition placement sets the trajectory to increase according to the rule, approaching the asymptotic limit and staying within region . On the other hand, whenever we have , population size decreases asymptotically towards This establishes as a stable equilibrium in region (see Figure 2(a)). Alternatively, under the statement , since we have , the ordering ; then, since implies we could have or . If gets true, will behave according to the law, and then it will decrease from and approach the asymptotic limit For , the population size still conforming to the growth law will increase from and approach Thus, stands for a stable equilibrium in the region (see Figure 2(b)). Under the arrangement, population size begins in the region following the rule with . If , increases as it asymptotically approaches . On the other hand, if , decreases while asymptotically approaching . Therefore, the condition bears a stable equilibrium at (see Figure 2(c)). Whenever , the equilibrium lies within region . Since , population size increases according to rule approaching reaching the boundary at time switching to rule , since population size increases asymptotically towards staying within region (see Figure 2(d)). and bear increasing from and could approach asymptotically whenever this equilibrium solution lies within region or if .

**(a)**

**(b)**

For , population size starts in the region and controls by with equilibrium solution satisfying . Hence, decreases and attains the threshold at a time , transferring to rule and then asymptotically approaching the equilibrium solution (see Figure 3(a)). For the arrangement , the initial condition sets to acquire the law in and then it approaches the equilibrium solution . Correspondingly, the composite obeys the rule in region , but since , it remains stationary at . These configurations suggest a maximum limiting effect of resource scarcity. For , population size begins within the region and since places in region , then decreases, intersecting at a time where it switches to rule , ultimately approaching the equilibrium solution . A arrangement sets , and population size starts within the region and sets by approaching the equilibrium (see Figure 3(b)). For , the conditions and set population size beginning within the region , following that remains stationary at . For , initial condition sets population size within the region , following . Since and implies , then decreases to (see Figure 3(c)). For , we have , and population size starts within the region and follows to growth law but since , it remains stationary at (see Figure 3(d)). Configurations in Figure 3 suggest a maximum limiting effect of resource scarcity on population growth; even a condition does not perform.

**(a)**

**(b)**

In summary, the PLF-PPM’s continuous-time global population size trajectory can stand an outstanding array of different performances. It could model population decline whenever the ordering holds (see Figure 1). Alternatively, could induce conditional stability depending on the achieved parametric arrangement (e.g., Figure 2). Also, the statement could entail a purely growing regime for population size (e.g. shown in Figure 2(d). Furthermore, circumstance signposts a maximum effect of resource abatement on population growth (e.g., shown in Figure 3(c)). Moreover, for critical values of threshold, this configuration could exacerbate Allee effects, and this is due to random influences which could promote vanishing of population size. Furthermore, the ratio in the settings of the PLF-PPM is interpreted as an Allee threshold since implies , so population size below controls the mortality process as entailed by the setup (cf. equation (21)). It is also pertinent to emphasize that for model type , even though population size places below the starvation threshold , its dynamics could take place under an Allee effect regime. Correspondingly, for type models, population could evolve in a regime combining both starvation and Allee effects. Consequently, by adapting the number of factors defining and in equation (17) so as to suit specific modeling aims, we could endure the PLF-PPM suitable predictive strength. In what follows, we explain the performance of the PLF-PPM model of equation (22) as an exploratory tool given different datasets.

#### 4. Study Cases

In what follows, we explain the performance of the PLF-PPM model of equation (22) as an exploratory tool given different datasets. We address data of Armstrong [7] on the growth of populations of asexual *Dugesia tigrina*, data reported by Huisman [8] on developing experimental populations of the unicellular green algae *Chlorella vulgaris*, a study by Davidson [9] on a sheep population introduced in Tasmania, data by Pearl [10] on the growth of *Drosophila melanogaster*, and data reported by Hughes and Tanner [11] on the slow decline of an *Agaricia agaricites* population on Jamaican reefs. Fitted parameters, associated standard deviations, and concordance correlation coefficient values [12] are given in Table 3. All required PLF-PPM fits were achieved by using the Berkeley Madonna Software Version 8.3.18. Besides, acquiring the resource abatement function relied on using equation (18) setting for , which assures getting a proxy for the maximum depletion rate.

Armstrong [7] maintained populations of asexual *Dugesia tigrina*, in an arrangement of finger bowls. Bowls contained 120 ccs of water each and were kept at a temperature of 25°C. Every other day, each population received 0.1 ccs of freshly killed brine shrimp. The bowls were cleaned at the end of the feeding period. The initial population size in every bowl amounted to 35 worms. Reproduction occurred only by transverse fission, with each worm dividing to produce a tail that developed into a new individual. For data assembly, a tail was any recent fission product not adequately developed to consume food. In the experiment, tails were added to the population’s artificially increasing reproductive efficiency. Because this method amounts to exogenous addition of biomass, we focused on data of population control named 1–0 without tails added to fit the PLF-PM. The plot of the global trajectory is shown in Figure 4(a). Associated estimated parameter values are presented in Table 3. Acquired orderings were and corresponding to a arrangement composing regions , and . Population size places initially within the region and acquires the form until it reaches the upper boundary at at time where it gets into the region switching to rule , approaching the asymptotic limit . Since dynamics mainly describe the region , mortality could perhaps be explained by cannibalism induced by high intraspecific competition. The author inferred about food scarcity for population levels near the equilibrium. Nevertheless, the PLF-PM identifies an energy threshold well above the equilibrium level, which explains the shape of the resource depletion trajectory proxy shown in Figure 4(b). Therefore, population regulation is solely controlled by density-dependent mortality.

**(a)**

**(b)**

Huisman [8] studied the growth of experimental populations of the unicellular green algae *Chlorella vulgaris*. Populations were raised in continuous cultures incubated at 20°C and administered with plentiful nutrients and *O*_{2}. Thus, growth limitation is exclusively associated with incident light energy. We handpicked data on population . Figure 5(a) shows the global trajectory associated with the fit of the PLF-PM. The values of estimated parameters are presented in Table 3. Acquired parametric orderings were and conforming to composing regions , and . Population size places initially within the region and rules by until it reaches the upper boundary at at time where it goes into the region switching to rule , approaching the asymptotic limit . The equilibrium value was practically attained at the end of the 18^{th} day, with regulation by recruitment of new individuals and mortality dominated by individual properties. This photosynthetic organism synthesizes biomass based on a combination of factors like light, CO_{2}, and nutrients. The threshold could be conceived as the biomass size such that the aggregated life enduring factors become limiting factors. Because there were sufficient CO_{2} and nutrients in this case, the threshold could be interpreted as the level of available light energy. Our analysis sustains the assumption in [8] that population growth in *Chlorella vulgaris* is limited exclusively by incident light. Therefore, the value of the threshold estimated by the fit of the PLF-PPM determines a resource abatement function that suggests that the amount of incident light for the G-labeled population in Huisman’s experiment was not limiting (see Figure 5(b)); this is because the equivalent of in biomass units lies well above the equilibrium level .

**(a)**

**(b)**

Davidson [9] studied a sheep population introduced in Tasmania. We acquired related proxy data from [13] representing the averages of the number of individuals taken on periods of 5 years. The recorded data span a total of 120 years. The first average corresponds to 1814–1819, and we arranged for 1819 to stand for year zero. The global trajectory acquired from the fit of the PLF-PM is shown in Figure 6(a). The obtained parametric orderings were and , associated to a arrangement that composes regions , and . Population size places initially within the region and progressed according to rule . The fit points out that within the region , population growth was slow at the beginning, which suggests that reproduction was limited by a reduced number of individuals. Population size crossed the threshold at the beginning of year 6 (1825). Population growth switched to rule , associated with recruitment and mortality controlled by population size. Thus, fitted trajectory increased approaching the equilibrium placing inside (see Figure 6(a)). Besides, it can be learned from Figure 6(b) that in spite of surpassing two records and another two almost reaching the threshold, their influence was not strong enough so as to change the damped oscillating trend about imposed by rule . Indeed, the dominance of the dynamic arrangement endured by the rule stayed over some time long enough to induce the trend to equilibrium suggested by the PLF-PPM fit.

**(a)**

**(b)**

We now consider the construction of the global trajectory associated with a fit of the PLF-PM to data of [10], taken from [14]. Pearl [10] maintained populations of *Drosophila melanogaster* in bottles using yeast as food and fitted a logistic curve to the associated data expressed as the counted number of adult flies in a particular day. Sang [15] criticized the procedure, quarreling that the experiments did not keep the yeast constant but as a growing population on its own. The plots associated with the PLF-PPM fit displayed in Figure 7(a) produced the parameter orderings and that conform to a arrangement, that is, a model type with : and : . Phase arrangement includes regions , and . At the beginning of the growth process, stays in the region but the statement : , forces associating a rule to increase, and then it reaches the boundary at thereby entering the region and then progressing asymptotically to following rule The fit shows that the fly population is entirely controlled by density-dependent mortality. In contrast to Sang [15], the PLF-PPM fit demonstrates that energy did not play a decisive role ; also, see Figure 7(b)), so we can close that variations in feeding energy did not determine the dynamics since otherwise would compose the global trajectory . The application of the FDM sustains the assumption that in Pearl’s experiment, energy does not provide a criterion to define a carrying capacity. Furthermore, the equilibrium is not expressed in terms of E but solely as a function of the scaling parameters and

**(a)**

**(b)**

**(c)**

Hughes and Tanner [11] reported a slow decline of the coral population on Jamaican reefs over 16 years. We fitted the PLF-PM to data on *Agaricia agaricites* colonies recorded during 1977–1993. The authors established that local extinction is explained by increased mortality rates plus the adverse effects of two hurricanes, Allen (in 1980) and Gilberto (in 1988). Also relevant in explaining the decline was the impossibility of recovery because of a recruitment failure. Figure 8(a) shows the global trajectory associated with the fit of the PLF-PM. The values of the parameter estimates are given in Table 3. Acquired parametric orderings were and conforming to a arrangement and composing regions , and . Population size places initially within the region and rules by Food was not limiting. Perhaps perturbation set its level under the upper boundary of the region where Allee effects dominate mortality. Then, possibly a recruitment failure impeded compensation to the abatement effects linked to the ordering. Then, our analysis corroborates the assumption of Hughes and Tanner [11]. In any event, recruitment failure could not associate with resource reduction (see Figure 8(b)).

**(a)**

**(b)**

The PLF-PPM displayed high reproducibility strength in all performed fits, as it derives from the high CCC values included in Table 3. Moreover, parallel plots of resource abatement explain that fitted values of initial resource availability thresholds E explain the occurrence of recorded equilibrium levels. Results point towards the consistency of the PLF-PPM as an exploratory tool. Nevertheless, the direct fitting procedure endured by the Berkeley Madonna software relied upon apportioning initial values of parameter estimates. Necessarily, this brought about high sensibility associated to local minimum problems at the non-linear acquisition of final estimates. Detected inconveniences suggest revision aimed at adapting techniques that could lessen the experienced parameter estimation burden.

##### 4.1. Outline of the Discrete-Time Setup of the PLF-PPM

Although this paper focuses on addressing the analysis of the PLF-PPM arrangement trajectories on continuous time, we consider it pertinent at this setting to outline the associated discrete-time form. For this reason, we let denote the discrete-time form of the phase model as given by equation (22) for . Also, let be the corresponding range of application of the rule Then, if stands for the characteristic function of , we getfor with being placed on one of the regions . Then,

The parametrization and and then the change of variable will bring the logistic map as a submodel composing the seek for discrete-time formulation. Concomitantly, equation (25) transforms intowhere

Equivalently,

For the sake of conciseness, we avert a detailed study of the performance of the discrete-time form of the PLF-PPM to an upcoming second part of this work. In the meantime, the parametrization of equation (25) given by equation (29) bears insight since it suggests that given the condition on the parameter that renders upset of chaos in the logistic map submodel , once the resulting orbit crosses the upper boundary of the region , dynamics will be set by the submodel so the system will escape the chaotic regime and approach an equilibrium point in the region or the orbit could get back again to the chaotic regime determined by the logistic map . Alternatively, the orbit could reach the lower boundary of the region then switching to the dynamics ruling in . Then depending in the paramter odering could decrease steadily and eventually vanish, or else wander aound in region before getting back to the chaotic regime.

#### 5. Discussion

Regulation by extreme value is observed in a plentiful of biological processes covering varied scales. It manifests on cellular structures such as mitochondria, where the maxima or minima of a periodical chemical reaction rule the formation of observed patterns [16]. Also, in the ecological settings, variables such as physical stress due to high or low temperatures, salinity, soil water content, wind velocities, and long or short exposures to air express better through extreme values than standard measures of central tendency [17, 18]. The notion of biological control by extreme values dates back to Justus Von Liebig, who established the law of the minimum. It states that an organism’s growth rate is regulated by the nutrient present in the minimum [5]. Generally, any factor that slows down potential growth in an ecosystem is described as a limiting factor. Acknowledgment of lower-upper tolerance limits for a process drove generalization of the law of the minimum into the law of the tolerance of Shelford [6].

Furthermore, the interaction of limiting factors can indirectly influence the effect of other factors not in themselves limiting. This paradigm, known as the principle of limiting factors, has proven to be very useful in studying whole or parts of ecosystems [13, 19]. The joint Liebig–Shelford paradigm adopted here bears that population growth control occurs by balancing birth and mortality processes, the first determined by factor inducing the minimum offspring and the second by forcing the maximum number of deaths among individuals. This notion sustains the formal piecewise setup expressed by equation (22) and refers to PLF-PPM. Such a paradigm could allow a piecewise account of population dynamics composing growth phases delimited by density dependence cooperation and competition [20–23], thresholds of starvation, and critical density or extinction [20, 24]. The present PLF-PPM conceives growth phases controlled by limiting factors acting over domains bounded by population size thresholds. The first version of a PLF-PPM addressed a predator-prey model where Liebig’s law governs the natality process of the prey population [1]. Echavarría and Gomez [25] and Echavarría et al. [26] extended these ideas to formulate models in which the mortality rate is set by the maximum value of factors that depend on population size. Montiel-Arzate et al. [3] adopted the referred Liebig–Shelford principle of limiting factors to formulate a functionally diverse population growth model. The approach in [3] relied on a parametrization of the birth process that rendered qualitative exploration burdensome, explaining why it is missing. Besides, Montiel-Arzate et al. [3] did not include a specific parametrization of mortality due to Allee effects which we incorporate here represented by the term as described by equation (21). Present settings allowed exhaustive qualitative exploration of the PLF-PPM global trajectory presented in the Appendix. Even considering only population size and an external resource as limiting factors, the present formulation ensures a set of 20 basic orderings, each one associated to a different distribution of phases, which conform to an outstanding array of varying operation modes for the PLF-PPM. Such a flexible structure endures a sound interpretative strength displayed in the fitting results of the addressed study cases. Particularly, present settings allow visualization of abatement of resources controlling the birth process.

Nevertheless, a direct fitting procedure that relies on estimates’ initial values brought high sensibility associated with local minimum problems at the non-linear acquisition of final values. These inconveniences suggest revision aimed to adapt a maximization of reproducibility strength criterion and simulation techniques that could lessen the parameter estimation burden experienced. Another point concerns adaptation of a symbolic manipulation code aimed at automatically exploring phase arrangement and their implications for stability. Yet another essential issue left untouched here concerns exploring the outlined discrete-time version of the PLF-PPM of equation (25) and its alternate form (29). In the meantime, the parametrization of equation (29) already suggests that even conditions on the parameter rendering upset of chaos in the logistic map submodel once the resulting orbit crosses the upper boundary of the region dynamics will be set by the submodel, so the system will escape chaos before the orbit gets back again to the chaotic regime determined by the logistic map . Given the present results, no doubt that the suggested adaptation of codes to enhance both qualitative exploration and parameter fitting procedures will strengthen the applicability of offered PLF-PPM. Meanwhile, its present form already provides an outstanding research tool through which critical ecological parameters can be identified and be meaningfully interpreted.

#### 6. Conclusions

This paper elucidates a logical deductive approach to establishing a piecewise structured model to interpret the growth of a single species population. The offered PLF-PPM derives as a logical consequence of what we coined as a principle of limiting factors for population growth, a paradigm adapted by merging Liebig’s law of the minimum and the tolerance law of Shelford. The formal approach explains by the extreme value characterization of the birth and mortality processes in equation (15). Conceived forms allow the selection of the factors that play the decisive role in controlling population growth at a given time. The flexibility from a piecewise structure imbues the PLF-PPM with a noticeable reproducibility strength. Considered study cases briefly elaborate on this. The PLF-PPM bears as well an outstanding interpretative advantage. Such a feature infuses our construct with the capability of identifying different growth phases. These associate with regions of the dominance of crucial factors determining population dynamics such as a starvation regime, population size viability, or regimes of high population density effects. We only contemplated one external factor, , and population size itself to describe and . Concomitantly, the number of possible phase configurations was over ten times the number of parameters involved, which is the reason why ensuing parametrization proved to be seemingly adequate given addressed datasets. Nevertheless, as the number of explaining factors increases, more parameters are required. Then, the tied analytical exploration becomes complicated. Then particularly, acquiring suitable complexity could lead to local minimum difficulties connected to non-linear estimation. In this order of ideas, a quest for efficient parameter estimation methods that enhance the practical advantages derived from the PLF-PPM seems necessary. Such an endeavor concerns the research aims to pursue in a further paper. Another relevant research subject is pending, which is exhaustively exploring the discrete-time PLF-PPM construct outlined by equation (25).

#### Appendix

To study the diverse configurations of the phase portrait associated with the model of equation (22), we depart from the fundamental order relationship for the external energy and the ratio of mortality from population density proportions, , that yields a first model type classification . We have to consider model type associated to the inequality , where the range of composes the regions: , , and . For model type where the relationship holds, the range of will be divided into the regions , and . For model type linking to the ordering , the range of will be divided into the regions and . Besides, it is also required to classify possible phase portrait arrangements according to the Birth to Mortality Scaled Ordering (), namely, : when , : if , and : whenever . Finally, the placement of the initial condition placement determines a third classification pointer , namely, for , whenever (), : whenever : if , and : whenever (). Correspondingly, for , whenever (), : when : if , and : whenever . The possible phase portrait arrangements typify according to a three-dimensional conjunction operator for and as specified. Tables 1 and 2 summarizes phase arrangements and corresponding parameter orderings.

#### (A). Analysis of Trajectories for Orderings of the Type

We begin by analyzing case associated to conjunction : model type ), Birth to Mortality Scaled Order (, and initial condition ordering ). Given this parametric arrangement, the range is associated. Then, since , at the beginning of the growth process, population size departs from a value and its dynamics are set by the path prevailing in region .