In the article titled “Mixing dyadic and deliberative opinion dynamics in an agent-based model of group decision-making” [1], there are a few typographical errors and wording mistakes to be revised, more specifically in Equations (5) and (7):(1)In Section 2, “agents have agency” is a pleonasm. The authors wanted to put emphasis on the fact that agents in the model have the ability to observe, interpret, and analyse the information they are provided with and, eventually, act accordingly.(2)In Equation (5), “oit − oit” should be corrected to “oit − ojt”:(3)In Equation (7), Section 2.4.1 points (ii) and (iii), and line 12, “modtD” should be corrected to “mod(1 + tD)” and should look, respectively, as follows:(ii)If , then = d, and , otherwise;(iii)… such that is a deliberation process with ; In Algorithm 4, if , then;(4)In Figure 8 and in Section 3.2.1, line 2 of the second paragraph, the word “dyamics” should be “dynamics”;(5)In the legend to Table 6, “with respect to to its factors” should be “with respect to its factors.”
Corrigendum | Open Access
Corrigendum to “Mixing Dyadic and Deliberative Opinion Dynamics in an Agent-Based Model of Group Decision-Making”
Received05 Nov 2020
Accepted05 Nov 2020
Published13 Feb 2021
References
G. Butler, G. Pigozzi, and J. Rouchier, “Mixing dyadic and deliberative opinion dynamics in an agent-based model of group decision-making,” Complexity, vol. 2019, Article ID 3758159, 31 pages, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2021 George Butler et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.