Research Article
Bench Testing and Modeling Analysis of Optimum Shifting Point of HMCVT
Table 10
Comparison of predication accuracy between two models.
| Numbers of test | Parameters | Test value of speed drop/r/min | Predictive value 1/r/min | Predictive value 2/r/min | Test value of dynamic load | Predictive value 1 | Predictive value 2 | Test value of sliding friction/KJ | Predictive value 1/KJ | Predictive value 2/KJ |
| 1 | 83 | 93.604 | 97.255 | 2.13 | 1.719 | 2.09 | 3776 | 2386.4 | 4375.6 | 2 | 67.5 | 70.560 | 72.587 | 2.22 | 1.932 | 2.30 | 3290 | 3545.7 | 3534.9 | 3 | 55 | 52.434 | 51.217 | 2.45 | 2.158 | 2.53 | 2313 | 2729.4 | 2718.5 | 4 | 51 | 57.354 | 54.52 | 2.67 | 2.172 | 2.54 | 2283 | 2753.8 | 2742.9 | 5 | 139.75 | 98.684 | 100.743 | 2.35 | 2.528 | 2.97 | 7873 | 4954.3 | 4941.3 | 6 | 68.25 | 60.292 | 60.73 | 2.56 | 2.987 | 3.43 | 3768 | 3317.3 | 3304.2 | 7 | 60.25 | 59.184 | 58.00 | 2.66 | 3.182 | 3.62 | 3079 | 2833.7 | 2820.6 | 8 | 74.25 | 83.417 | 83.88 | 3.54 | 3.344 | 3.86 | 3719 | 4751.7 | 4736.3 | 9 | 70.5 | 62.042 | 62.51 | 3.66 | 3.771 | 4.29 | 3554 | 3447.4 | 3432 | 10 | 122.25 | 121.809 | 120.68 | 3.20 | 3.229 | 3.83 | 7269 | 7032.7 | 7014.7 | 11 | 77.25 | 80.167 | 80.66 | 3.97 | 3.887 | 4.49 | 4543 | 4907.7 | 4889.7 | 12 | 68.75 | 75.809 | 77.94 | 4.13 | 4.282 | 4.88 | 4246 | 3936.1 | 3918.1 | 13 | 157.75 | 139.854 | 137.13 | 3.12 | 3.119 | 3.81 | 9184 | 8543.2 | 8522.5 | 14 | 112.5 | 113.559 | 112.46 | 3.56 | 3.532 | 4.22 | 7201 | 7214.5 | 7193.7 | 15 | 92.5 | 88.934 | 91.09 | 4.04 | 4.158 | 4.85 | 5207 | 5422.2 | 5401.4 | 16 | 76.25 | 90.603 | 94.39 | 4.12 | 4.372 | 5.06 | 4859 | 4958.6 | 4937.8 | Mean deviation | | 0.1161 | 0.101 | | 0.082 | 0.169 | | 0.114 | 0.113 | Forecast precision | | 88.39% | 89.9% | | 91.8% | 83.1% | | 88.6% | 88.7% |
|
|