Research Article
An Improved Nonequidistant Grey Model Based on Simpson Formula and Its Application
Table 3
Simulative and predictive values by the competitive models in Case
1.
| Time | Data | GM (1, 1) | NGM (1, 1, k) | NEGM (1, 1, t2) | INEGM (1, 1, t2) | Value | APE (%) | Value | APE (%) | Value | APE (%) | Value | APE (%) |
| In-sample | 1 | 78.60 | 78.60 | 0.00 | 78.60 | 0.00 | 78.60 | 0.00 | 78.60 | 0.00 | 3 | 78.40 | 79.06 | 0.84 | 78.67 | 0.34 | 78.67 | 0.35 | 78.52 | 0.16 | 5 | 80.30 | 79.65 | 0.81 | 79.83 | 0.58 | 80.08 | 0.27 | 80.19 | 0.14 | 8 | 80.70 | 80.39 | 0.38 | 80.77 | 0.09 | 80.67 | 0.04 | 80.67 | 0.03 | 10 | 81.10 | 81.15 | 0.06 | 81.37 | 0.33 | 81.66 | 0.08 | 81.15 | 0.03 | 12 | 81.50 | 81.75 | 0.31 | 81.67 | 0.21 | 81.55 | 0.06 | 81.52 | 0.03 | 15 | 82.10 | 82.03 | 0.08 | 81.91 | 0.23 | 82.03 | 0.08 | 81.99 | 0.13 |
| Out-of-sample | 17 | 82.60 | 82.51 | 0.10 | 82.07 | 0.64 | 82.52 | 0.10 | 82.47 | 0.16 | 19 | 82.80 | 83.29 | 0.59 | 82.15 | 0.79 | 82.90 | 0.13 | 82.84 | 0.05 | 22 | 83.70 | 83.92 | 0.26 | 28.21 | 1.78 | 83.39 | 0.37 | 83.31 | 0.46 | 25 | 83.80 | 84.70 | 1.08 | 82.26 | 1.84 | 83.97 | 0.20 | 83.88 | 0.10 | 29 | 84.00 | 85.65 | 1.97 | 82.28 | 2.04 | 84.64 | 0.77 | 84.54 | 0.64 | 31 | 84.70 | 86.78 | 2.46 | 82.30 | 2.84 | 85.22 | 0.62 | 85.11 | 0.48 |
|
|