Research Article
An Improved Nonequidistant Grey Model Based on Simpson Formula and Its Application
Table 6
Simulative and predictive values by the competitive models in Case
2.
| Time | Data | GM (1, 1) | NGM (1, 1, k) | NEGM (1, 1, t2) | INEGM (1, 1, t2) | Value | APE (%) | Value | APE (%) | Value | APE (%) | Value | APE (%) |
| In-sample | 1 | 9.28 | 9.28 | 0.00 | 9.28 | 0.00 | 9.28 | 0.00 | 9.28 | 0.00 | 25 | 10.71 | 10.88 | 1.59 | 10.75 | 0.37 | 10.75 | 0.37 | 10.72 | 0.56 | 53 | 11.31 | 11.19 | 1.06 | 11.27 | 0.35 | 1.30 | 0.09 | 11.30 | 0.11 | 83 | 11.64 | 11.54 | 0.86 | 11.68 | 0.34 | 11.67 | 0.26 | 11.66 | 0.16 | 116 | 12.00 | 11.93 | 0.58 | 12.00 | 0.00 | 11.97 | 0.25 | 12.28 | 0.39 | 147 | 12.23 | 12.34 | 0.90 | 12.22 | 0.08 | 12.24 | 0.08 | 12.28 | 0.39 |
| Out-of-sample | 177 | 13.05 | 12.75 | 2.30 | 12.36 | 5.29 | 12.48 | 5.29 | 12.56 | 3.72 | 237 | 13.16 | 13.38 | 1.67 | 12.50 | 5.02 | 12.83 | 5.02 | 12.99 | 1.31 | 269 | 13.61 | 14.04 | 3.16 | 12.58 | 7.57 | 13.18 | 7.57 | 13.42 | 1.40 | 355 | 13.94 | 14.96 | 7.32 | 12.63 | 9.40 | 13.63 | 9.40 | 13.97 | 0.24 |
|
|