Research Article

Vulnerability of Submarine Cable Network of Mainland China: Comparison of Vulnerability between before and after Construction of Trans-Arctic Cable System

Table 1

Major international submarine cable systems landing in Mainland China.

No.SystemCodeBandwidth capacityLength (km)Completed timeRemarks

1China-Japan fiber-optic submarine cable systemC-J560 mbps1252Dec, 1993Abandoned in 2006
2China-Korea fiber-optic submarine cable systemC-K1120 mbps549Feb, 1996Abandoned in 2005
3FLAG Europe AsiaFLAG10 Gbps27000Sep, 1997In service
4South-East Asia-Middle East-West Europe 3SMW3960 Gbps390001999In service
5China-US cable networkCUCN80 Gbps30800Jan, 2000Abandoned in 2016
6Asia Pacific cable network 2APCN22.56 Tbps19000Dec, 2000In service
7East Asia crossingEAC2.56 Tbps19850Jan, 2002In service
8City-to-City cable systemC2C7.68 Tbps17000Aug, 2002In service
9Trans-Pacific ExpressTPE5.12 Tbps17700Sep, 2008In service
10South-East Asia Japan cable systemSJC15 Tbps10700Feb, 2013In service
11Asia Pacific gatewayAPG54 Tbps104002016In service
12Asia-Africa-Europe-1 cable systemAAE-140 Tbps250002017In service
13New crossing-Pacific cable systemNCP60 Tbps136182018In service
14Trans-Arctic cable systemTAC60 Tbps12700by 2023Planned