Complexity / 2021 / Article / Tab 1 / Research Article
Vulnerability of Submarine Cable Network of Mainland China: Comparison of Vulnerability between before and after Construction of Trans-Arctic Cable System Table 1 Major international submarine cable systems landing in Mainland China.
No. System Code Bandwidth capacity Length (km) Completed time Remarks 1 China-Japan fiber-optic submarine cable system C-J 560 mbps 1252 Dec, 1993 Abandoned in 2006 2 China-Korea fiber-optic submarine cable system C-K 1120 mbps 549 Feb, 1996 Abandoned in 2005 3 FLAG Europe Asia FLAG 10 Gbps 27000 Sep, 1997 In service 4 South-East Asia-Middle East-West Europe 3 SMW3 960 Gbps 39000 1999 In service 5 China-US cable network CUCN 80 Gbps 30800 Jan, 2000 Abandoned in 2016 6 Asia Pacific cable network 2 APCN2 2.56 Tbps 19000 Dec, 2000 In service 7 East Asia crossing EAC 2.56 Tbps 19850 Jan, 2002 In service 8 City-to-City cable system C2C 7.68 Tbps 17000 Aug, 2002 In service 9 Trans-Pacific Express TPE 5.12 Tbps 17700 Sep, 2008 In service 10 South-East Asia Japan cable system SJC 15 Tbps 10700 Feb, 2013 In service 11 Asia Pacific gateway APG 54 Tbps 10400 2016 In service 12 Asia-Africa-Europe-1 cable system AAE-1 40 Tbps 25000 2017 In service 13 New crossing-Pacific cable system NCP 60 Tbps 13618 2018 In service 14 Trans-Arctic cable system TAC 60 Tbps 12700 by 2023 Planned