Research Article

Investigation of ANN Architecture for Predicting Load-Carrying Capacity of Castellated Steel Beams

Table 3

Results comparison with currently popular AI techniques.

ReferenceNumber of data samplesMethod and inputPerformance criteria for testing part
R2RMSE (kN)MAE (kN)

Amayreh and Saka [36]478 inputs (minimum web yield stress, span of the castellated beam, overall depth, minimum width of the web post, web thickness, flange thickness, width of flange, loading condition)
Method: backpropagation network
0.995Not providedNot provided

Gholizadeh et al. [37]140Geometrical inputs only (the overall depth of castellated beam; the vertical projection of inclined side of opening; the web thickness; the flange width; the flange thickness; the width of web post at middepth; the horizontal projection of inclined side of opening)
BP14.0625
BP23.5611
ANFIS12.7276
ANFIS22.0631

Gandomi et al. [38]478 inputs (minimum web yield stress, span of the castellated beam, overall depth, minimum width of the web post, web thickness, flange thickness, width of flange, loading condition)
Methods
Genetic programming0.81732.33
Least-squares regression (LSR)0.68236.60

Aminian et al. [39]1425 inputs (the overall depth of castellated beam, the vertical projection of inclined side of opening, the web thickness, the minimum web yield stress, and the width of web post at middepth)
Linear genetic programming0.9604.62
GSA algorithm0.9524.95

This investigation1509 inputs (the overall depth of castellated beam, the vertical projection of inclined side of opening, the web thickness, the flange width, the flange thickness, the width of web post at middepth, the horizontal projection of inclined side of opening, the minimum web yield stress, the minimum flange yield stress)0.9893.3282.622