Complexity Relationship between Power and Trust in Hybrid Megaproject Governance: The Structural Equation Modelling Approach

Table 3

Results of the structural equation modelling.

Hypotheses	Variables	Estimate	Standard error (S.E.)	Critical ratio (C.R.)	Result
H1a	Power asymmetry ⟶ performance	0.561	0.13	2.132	Accepted
H1b	Power sharing ⟶ performance	0.452	0.15	2.546	Accepted
H3a	Power asymmetry ⟶ trust level	0.378	0.14	2.341	Accepted
H3b	Power sharing ⟶ trust level	0.685	0.213	3.624	Accepted
H2	Trust level ⟶ performance	0.653	0.161	3.256	Accepted

S.E: standard error and C.R: critical ratio (t value)