Research Article
Energy-Optimal 3D Path Planning for MAV with Motion Uncertainty
Table 3
Simulation results of the two methods.
| Evaluations | Traditional ACO | Proposed energy-optimal method | With drift characteristic | Without drift characteristic |
| Averaged path length/m | 10.30 | 9.64 | 9.94 | Averaged climbing and descending rate/m/s | 0.23 | 0.14 | 0.16 | Averaged minimum turning angle | 41.46° | 47.39° | 43.94° |
|
|