Research Article
Optimising the Selection of Input Variables to Increase the Predicting Accuracy of Shear Strength for Deep Beams
Table 5
A comparison between the efficiency of the proposed models.
| Model | Distribution of data in terms of relative error for each model | Training phase | Testing phase | 5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | 5% | 10% | 15% | 20% |
| LWLR | 62.78 | 87.78 | 95.56 | 98.89 | 31.96 | 60.04 | 75.00 | 85.87 | RF | 54.44 | 80.00 | 90.00 | 92.22 | 22.83 | 45.65 | 65.22 | 75.00 | MLR | 22.22 | 43.33 | 60.56 | 72.78 | 17.39 | 30.43 | 47.83 | 59.78 | ELM | 35.56 | 61.67 | 82.22 | 90.56 | 18.48 | 48.91 | 58.70 | 68.48 |
|
|