Engaging Stakeholders in Extraction Problems of the Chilean Mining Industry through a Combined Social Network Analysis-Analytic Network Process Approach

Table 9

SNA-ANP analysis vs. key characteristics.

Key characteristics	Measure	Best positions	To be strengthened in
Contacted by other stakeholders; Greater support capacity [7,41]	OutDeg	A11.ULS; A6.SEREMÍA	A10.CCHC
			A4.CORFO
			A2.SONAMI
			A1.ENAMI
			A8. SENCE
			A7.GORE
Contact more actors; Request support; Greater access to support [7,41]	InDeg	A1.ENAMI; A6.SEREMÍA; A3.SERNAGEOMÍN; A2.SONAMI	A15.AGM Ovalle
			A12.AGM La Higuer
			A14.AGM Punitaqui
			A17.AGM Salamanca
			A13.AGM Andacollo
			A16.AGM Combarbalá
Closer to support the rest of the network [37]	OutClose	A11.ULS; A6.SEREMÍA; A4.CORFO; A1.ENAMI	A2.SONAMI
			A3.SERNAGEOMÍN
			A5.SERCOTEC
			A7.GORE
			A8.SENCE
			A9.DDT
			A10.C.CH.C
Get help faster [35]	InClose	A1.ENAMI; A6.SEREMÍA; A3.SERNAGEOMÍN; A2.SONAMI; A7.GORE	A15.AGM Ovalle
			A12.AGM La Higuera
			A14.AGM Punitaqui
			A17.AGM Salamanca
			A13.AGM Andacollo
			A16.AGM Combarbalá
Reduced delivery effort [29,54]	OutEigen	A11.ULS; A6.SEREMÍA	A7.GORE
			A8.SENCE
			A10.CCHC
			A9.DDT
			A5.SERCOTEC
			A3.SERNAGEOMÍN
Less effort to seek/demand support or help [29,54]	InEigen	A1.ENAMI; A6.SEREMÍA; A3.SERNAGEOMÍN	A15.AGM Ovalle
			A12.AGM La Higuera
			A14.AGM Punitaqui
			A17.AGM Salamanca
			A13.AGM Andacollo
			A16.AGM Combarbalá
			A2.SONAMI
Gatekeepers; Close structural holes [41,50]	Between	A11.ULS; A1.ENAMI; A6.SEREMÍA	A4.CORFO
			A2.SONAMI
			A3.SERNAGEOMÍN
			A7.GORE
Influence [15]	ANP	A11.ULS; A6.SEREMÍA; A4.CORFO	A1.ENAMI
			A2.SONAMI
			A3.SERNAGEOMÍN
			A5.SERCOTEC
			A7.GORE
			A8. SENCE
			A9.DDT
			A10.CCHC