Research Article
Compliance Risk Assessment in the Banking Sector: Application of a Novel Pairwise Comparison-Based PRISM Method
Table 3
PRISM numbers based on the aggregated values in Appendix
B.
| | | Case | o-s | o-d | d-s | Max | Rank |
| | A (m) | C1 | 8.1 | 5.7 | 7.3 | 8.1 | 4 | | C2 | 3.5 | 10.5 | 3.0 | 10.5 | 2 | | C3 | 9.2 | 4.4 | 6.5 | 9.2 | 3 | | C4 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 7.9 | 7.9 | 5 | | C5 | 2.8 | 2.1 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 6 | | C6 | 7.5 | 14.2 | 8.5 | 14.2 | 1 |
| | M (m) | C1 | 5.7 | 4.8 | 5.5 | 5.7 | 4 | | C2 | 4.5 | 6.5 | 4.0 | 6.5 | 2 | | C3 | 6.2 | 4.3 | 5.4 | 6.2 | 3 | | C4 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 5.6 | 5.6 | 5 | | C5 | 3.4 | 2.9 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 6 | | C6 | 5.7 | 7.6 | 6.1 | 7.6 | 1 |
| | S (m) | C1 | 16.7 | 11.4 | 15.6 | 16.7 | 4 | | C2 | 13.6 | 21.4 | 9.8 | 21.4 | 2 | | C3 | 19.8 | 9.4 | 16.7 | 19.8 | 3 | | C4 | 10.4 | 9.5 | 15.8 | 15.8 | 5 | | C5 | 5.9 | 4.2 | 5.9 | 5.9 | 6 | | C6 | 17,1 | 28.6 | 20.5 | 28.6 | 1 |
|
|
The bold values are highlighting the PRISM numbers.
|
