Complexity

Detection Models and Computation for Understanding the Frangibility of Complex Networks


Publishing date
01 Apr 2021
Status
Closed
Submission deadline
04 Dec 2020

Lead Editor
Guest Editors

1Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia

2China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China

3The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

This issue is now closed for submissions.

Detection Models and Computation for Understanding the Frangibility of Complex Networks

This issue is now closed for submissions.

Description

A network is one of the best data models to represent human behavior and interactions. For instance, social network users can share their interests and news on social network platforms, traffic users can express their common interests and daily activities by trajectory networks, and telephone network users show their social interactions at periodic levels. In the area of network science, lots of research has been developed to investigate information flow and influence diffusion models in such complex networks. However, the frangibility of the network has not yet been fully explored. The frangibility of a network may be affected by multiple factors in the network, e.g., the removal of users may result in the disconnection of the network, or the high communication cost of the network; the addition of users may enrich the network so that the communication cost can be largely reduced; the changed paths of consuming network content may also vary the communication of the information flow in the network.

It is highly challenging to diagnose the frangibility of complex networks. Traditional works have paid great efforts to discover the influential users or seed users at different situations using metrics such as centrality, betweenness, and ego network, or using the linear threshold model, independent cascade model, and the weighted user-defined path models. However, these works still focused on the influence diffusion, rather than the frangibility of the networks in the dynamic environment. In addition, it is desirable for researchers to investigate the non-human defined metrics to uncover the frangibility of networks, with which the correlated key players can be retrieved. To solve this challenging issue, in machine learning, concept learning has become one of the primary research tools in small sample learning research. The concept learning strategy aims to perform recognition or form new concepts from a few observations though fast processing. Concept learning employs matching rules to associate the concepts in the concept system with small sample input. It is very helpful to perform cognition or complete a recognition task in data analytics. With the capability of small samples and the learned knowledge, it can help to advance the realistic key player discovery models and efficiently find the key players for different target criteria.

This Special Issue invites researchers working in the field of knowledge-based systems, data science, and artificial intelligence to submit original papers discussing and promoting ideas and practices about advanced complex network management and analytics technologies for the frangibility-driven key user discovery. Original research and review articles are welcome.

Potential topics include but are not limited to the following:

  • Key user detection model with dynamic network change
  • Concept learning from small samples to user profiling in networks
  • Concept learning from small samples to attribute filling in networks
  • Concept learning for event type disambiguation in networks
  • New knowledge-driven concept learning across multiple networks
  • Root cause diagnoses-based concept learning for network flow change
  • Novel feature detection model for identifying the frangibility of networks
  • Efficient structural hole computation in complex networks
  • Top-k influential user detection in attributed networks
  • Anchor vertex exploration to enrich the networks
  • Dynamic network metric evaluation
  • Community-level information diffusion with concept learning

Articles

  • Special Issue
  • - Volume 2021
  • - Article ID 6615179
  • - Research Article

Link Trustworthiness Evaluation over Multiple Heterogeneous Information Networks

Meng Wang | Xu Qin | ... | Guilin Qi
  • Special Issue
  • - Volume 2021
  • - Article ID 6689323
  • - Research Article

An Efficient Recommendation Algorithm Based on Heterogeneous Information Network

Ying Yin | Wanning Zheng
  • Special Issue
  • - Volume 2021
  • - Article ID 6614941
  • - Review Article

Game-Based Trust in Complex Networks: Past, Present, and Future

Li Yi | Weidong Fang | ... | Baoqing Li
  • Special Issue
  • - Volume 2021
  • - Article ID 8867190
  • - Research Article

LPR-MLP: A Novel Health Prediction Model for Transmission Lines in Grid Sensor Networks

Yunliang Chen | Shaoqian Chen | ... | Geyong Min
  • Special Issue
  • - Volume 2021
  • - Article ID 6685396
  • - Research Article

A Novel Robust Fuzzy Rough Set Model for Feature Selection

Yuwen Li | Shoushui Wei | ... | Zhimin Zhang
  • Special Issue
  • - Volume 2021
  • - Article ID 6670039
  • - Research Article

Fuzzy Integral Sliding Mode Control Based on Microbial Fuel Cell

Lei Lian | Peng Ji | ... | Jing Liu
  • Special Issue
  • - Volume 2021
  • - Article ID 6638985
  • - Research Article

Sparse Graph Embedding Based on the Fuzzy Set for Image Classification

Minghua Wan | Mengting Ge | ... | Guowei Yang
  • Special Issue
  • - Volume 2020
  • - Article ID 6620528
  • - Research Article

Dominance-Partitioned Subgraph Matching on Large RDF Graph

Bo Ning | Yunhao Sun | ... | Guanyu Li
  • Special Issue
  • - Volume 2020
  • - Article ID 8871756
  • - Research Article

Subgraph-Indexed Sequential Subdivision for Continuous Subgraph Matching on Dynamic Knowledge Graph

Yunhao Sun | Guanyu Li | ... | Bo Ning
  • Special Issue
  • - Volume 2020
  • - Article ID 6628165
  • - Research Article

Log Pattern Mining for Distributed System Maintenance

Jia Chen | Peng Wang | ... | Wei Wang
Complexity
Publishing Collaboration
More info
Wiley Hindawi logo
 Journal metrics
See full report
Acceptance rate11%
Submission to final decision120 days
Acceptance to publication21 days
CiteScore4.400
Journal Citation Indicator0.720
Impact Factor2.3
 Submit Evaluate your manuscript with the free Manuscript Language Checker

We have begun to integrate the 200+ Hindawi journals into Wiley’s journal portfolio. You can find out more about how this benefits our journal communities on our FAQ.