Case Report | Open Access
Jahan Porhomayon, Gino Zadeii, Nader D. Nader, George R. Bancroft, Alireza Yarahamadi, "Application of Dual Mask for Postoperative Respiratory Support in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patient", Case Reports in Anesthesiology, vol. 2013, Article ID 321054, 3 pages, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/321054
Application of Dual Mask for Postoperative Respiratory Support in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patient
In some conditions continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or bilevel positive airway pressure (BIPAP) therapy alone fails to provide satisfactory oxygenation. In these situations oxygen (O2) is often being added to CPAP/BIPAP mask or hose. Central sleep apnea and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are often present along with other chronic conditions, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure, pulmonary fibrosis, neuromuscular disorders, chronic narcotic use, or central hypoventilation syndrome. Any of these conditions may lead to the need for supplemental O2 administration during the titration process. Maximization of comfort, by delivering O2 directly via a nasal cannula through the mask, will provide better oxygenation and ultimately treat the patient with lower CPAP/BIPAP pressure.
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a complex medical disorder, characterized by repetitive upper airway collapse during sleep. The disease affects individuals of all ages and predisposes to multiple comorbidities, including increased risk of cardiovascular disease .
Perioperative apneas appear to be multifactorial in nature. Sedatives and anesthetics have been shown to decrease pharyngeal muscle tone and therefore predispose to apnea . Meanwhile, the patient’s normal arousal responses and reflexes are also compromised by anesthetics . This predisposes to apneic episodes which can be more severe than those associated with natural sleep.
While many patients present for surgery with undiagnosed OSA, it is currently recommended that patients who receive ambulatory CPAP preoperatively should continue to have CPAP administered in the perioperative period. Otherwise, the optimal management of OSA in the perioperative period has yet to be elucidated .
2. Case Report
A 51-year-old obese male, with a history of daytime fatigue, presented to the anesthesia holding area for urgent appendectomy. He had previously undergone a sleep study several months before with apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) of 35 and a maximum desaturation to the low 60’s. Patient vital signs included a blood pressure of 140/85 mm/Hg, heart rate of 95 beats per minute and respiratory rate of 16 per minute with a temperature of 38 centigrade. His pulse oximetry (SaO2) reading was 91% with 2 liters/minute of nasal oxygen flow. Chest radiography did not show any pathology.
He was brought to operating room, and anesthesia was induced with propofol and succinylcholine in a rapid sequence technique. The trachea was intubated with the aid of a GlideScope. Anesthesia was maintained with mixtures of oxygen/air/desflurane/fentanyl. The patient was extubated without difficulty and was transported to the PACU on supplemental O2 via mask with SaO2 of 90%. On arrival to PACU and after the first set of vital signs, his SaO2 dropped to 88%. As CPAP was applied, he immediately started to have central apneas. Therefore, we started BIPAP therapy with O2 concentration of 50%. Because the patient was a major mouth breather with full beard, we continued to have difficulty achieving appropriate tidal volumes. The PACU nurses tried multiple full-face masks with or without a chin strap, but low tidal volume alarms continued. At BIPAP pressures of 15/11 cm H2O and O2 flow of 4 liters/minutes, we could not improve the saturation. The nurses were unable to stabilize saturations due to numerous central apneas. We then decided to use the dual mask (Figures 1 and 2) with 2 liters/min of O2 via nasal cannula. We set the BIPAP machine to pressure of 8/4 cm H2O and were finally able to adjust the pressure to 12/6 cm H2O with SaO2 of 92% and adequate tidal volume.
The potential for upper airway obstruction remains high postoperatively because of the effects of residual anesthetics, sedatives, and opioids. During the postoperative period, patients with severe obstructive sleep apnea are at increased risk for respiratory and cardiopulmonary complications . If a patient has his or her own CPAP device, it should be available in the recovery room for use immediately upon emergence from anesthesia. Under no circumstances should the patient be left unattended [3, 6]. Close observation is required until stability is established.
The use of higher CPAP/BIPAP pressure can lead to higher leakage, increased nasal drying or congestion, pressure sores on the bridge of the nose, difficulty exhaling, and higher levels of machine noise [7, 8]. Clearly, these are disadvantageous, and lower pressures are preferred.
In current clinical practice O2 is added to CPAP/BIPAP mask usually from a small hole into the mask or to CPAP/BIPAP hose. Hence, the added O2 becomes diluted by CPAP/BIPAP flow and is also subject to leakage . Patients rarely get the full benefit of supplemental O2.
Adding O2 directly to the patient’s mask is not practical because it can easily come disconnected when the patient changes position. This is a common source of patient complaints. The pressure can also affect the triggering function of the ventilator . Another disadvantage is having two separate tubes on the bed and two separate machines at the bedside.
Combining the O2 compressor and CPAP/BIPAP machine as well as combining the CPAP/BIPAP hose and the O2 hose (dual tube) to occupy less space can provide better convenience. Connecting an adjustable cannula to a full-face or nasal mask and delivering supplemental O2 directly to the nostrils will provide higher O2 saturation during inhalation with the help of CPAP/BIPAP pressure .
The authors do not have any financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence (bias) their work. Examples of potential conflict of interests include employment, consultancies, stock ownership, honoraria, paid expert testimony, patent applications/registrations, and grants or other funding.
- D. J. Eckert, A. Malhotra, and A. S. Jordan, “Mechanisms of apnea,” Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 313–323, 2009.
- G. Dhonneur, X. Combes, B. Leroux, and P. Duvaldestin, “Postoperative obstructive apnea,” Anesthesia and Analgesia, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 762–767, 1999.
- D. R. Hillman, P. R. Platt, and P. R. Eastwood, “Anesthesia, sleep, and upper airway collapsibility,” Anesthesiology Clinics, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 443–455, 2010.
- B. Hartmann, A. Junger, and J. Klasen, “Anesthesia and sleep apnea syndrome,” Anaesthesist, vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 684–693, 2005.
- C. Den Herder, J. Schmeck, D. J. K. Appelboom, and N. De Vries, “Risks of general anaesthesia in people with obstructive sleep apnoea,” British Medical Journal, vol. 329, no. 7472, pp. 955–959, 2004.
- J. A. Loadsman and D. R. Hillman, “Anaesthesia and sleep apnoea,” British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 254–266, 2001.
- D. Samolski, A. Antón, R. Güell, F. Sanz, J. Giner, and P. Casan, “Inspired oxygen fraction achieved with a portable ventilator: determinant factors,” Respiratory Medicine, vol. 100, no. 9, pp. 1608–1613, 2006.
- K. H. Ruhle and G. Nilius, “Mouth breathing in obstructive sleep apnea prior to and during nasal continuous positive airway pressure,” Respiration, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 40–45, 2008.
- E. Miyoshi, Y. Fujino, A. Uchiyama, T. Mashimo, and M. Nishimura, “Effects of gas leak on triggering function, humidification, and inspiratory oxygen fraction during noninvasive positive airway pressure ventilation,” Chest, vol. 128, no. 5, pp. 3691–3698, 2005.
Copyright © 2013 Jahan Porhomayon et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.