Case Report

Spontaneous Recovery of Paraplegia Caused by Spinal Epidural Hematoma after Removal of Epidural Catheter

Table 1

Characteristics of patients with spontaneous recovery of paraplegia due to SEH associated with epidural anesthesia.
(a)

ReferenceSexAge
(year)
Diagnosis, OperationConcurrent
disease
Preoperative
PLT counts and
coagulation studies
Epidural puncture

Our caseF60Epithelioid granuloma,
thracoscopic partial lung resection
HT, DMPLT / L
PT-INR 0.92
APTT 26.7 s
Straightforward
[2]F78Polyarticular rheumatoid arthritis,
total knee replacement
HT, DMWNLStraightforward
[3]F 90Gastric adenocarcinoma,
subtotal gastrectomy
Peptic ulcer diseaseWNLStraightforward
[4]F73Kidney tumor, left nephrectomyNoneWNLStraightforward
[5]F72Bile duct stenosis and cholelithiasis,
choledochoduodenostomy
and cholecystectomy
NoneWNLStraightforward
[6]M71Gastric cancer and rectal cancer,
miles surgery and gastrectomy
HT, ossification of the posterior
longitudinal ligament (T10-L1)
WNLStraightforward
[7]F 69Lung cancer, partial resection
of the lung
Cirrhosis of the liverPLT / L
PT 54%
Prior attempt at
T7/8 abandoned
due to backflow of blood
in the Touhy needle

SEH: spinal epidural hematoma, PLT: Platelet count, HT: hypertension, DM: diabetes mellitus, PT: prothrombin time, INR: international normalized ratio, APTT: activated partial thromboplastin time, POD: postoperative day, WNL: within normal limits, EDC: epidural catheter, MRI: magnetic resonance image, NS: not stated.
(b)

ReferenceInsertion site of epidural catheterAnticoagulant therapyOnset of
symptoms
Epidural catheter at the time of onset of paraplegiaSymptoms

Our caseT5/6NonePOD 110 min after removalVomiting Paraplegia
[2]L2/3Enoxaparin, postoperativelyPOD 2IndwellingBack pain Paraplegia
[3]T8/9Unfractionated heparin,
postoperatively
POD 2IndwellingParaplegia
[4]T12/L1Enoxaparin 24 h before surgery until 2 h before removal of EDC on POD 3POD 3Immediately after removalBack pain
Paraplegia
Absent anal sphincter reflex
[5]T7/8NonePOD 2IndwellingParaplegia
[6]T12/L1NonePOD 530 min after removalParaplegia
[7]T9/10NonePOD 5After surgery, blood was noted
at the insertion point of the catheter, which was then the removed
Paraplegia

(c)

ReferenceExtent of SEHCoagulation studies at the time of SEH occurrenceTime to improvement after occurrence of paraplegiaTreatmentReason that surgery was not doneFollow-up neurologic deficits

Our caseT1-9PLT / L
PT-INR 1.03
APTT 27.4 s
1 hNoneMotor function in legs began to return during MRI3 d later: none
[2]T10-L1PLT / L
PT-INR 1.04
On the same dayNSMotor function in legs began to return
before surgery
3 mon later: none
[3]T3-11PLT / L
PT-INR 1.1
APTT 32.6 s
By the next morning NSAge, advanced malignancy,
>12 h after paraplegia occurred
56 d later: none
[4]T11-L1NSOn the same dayDexamethasoneAt the time of the neurosurgical examination, motor function had returned to legs7 d later: none
[5]T6-9WNLOn the next dayDexamethasoneMotor function in legs returned after MRI40 d later: none
[6]T11-L1NS1 hNone1 h after paraplegia occurred,
paralysis had resolved completely
1 h later: none
[7]T4-8PLT / L
PT 42%
Between the next day
and POD 4
Glycerol
Steroid
On POD 2, neurologic findings
had stabilized and seemed
unlikely to deteriorate
1 mon later: mild hypoesthesia of left leg