Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Case Reports in Cardiology
Volume 2016, Article ID 6369812, 3 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6369812
Case Report

Successful Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Transradial Coronary Intervention with a 4Fr Guiding Catheter

1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saga-Ken Medical Centre KOSEIKAN, Saga, Japan
2Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, St. Mary’s Hospital, Kurume, Japan

Received 23 June 2016; Accepted 25 August 2016

Academic Editor: Expedito E. Ribeiro

Copyright © 2016 Yasuhiro Nakano and Kenji Sadamatsu. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. B. Dahm, D. Vogelgesang, A. Hummel, A. Staudt, H. Völzke, and S. B. Felix, “A randomized trial of 5 vs. 6 French transradial percutaneous coronary interventions,” Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 172–176, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. S. Jang, Y. J. Song, W. Kang et al., “Intravascular ultrasound-guided implantation of drug-eluting stents to improve outcome: a meta-analysis,” JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 233–243, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. P. Agostoni, G. G. L. Biondi-Zoccai, M. L. De Benedictis et al., “Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures: systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 349–356, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S. Saito, H. Ikei, G. Hosokawa, and S. Tanaka, “Influence of the ratio between radial artery inner diameter and sheath outer diameter on radial artery flow after transradial coronary intervention,” Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 173–178, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Rashid, C. S. Kwok, S. Pancholy et al., “Radial artery occlusion after transradial interventions: a systematic review and metaanalysis,” Journal of the American Heart Association, vol. 5, no. 1, Article ID e002686, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. F. Kiemeneij, F. Yoshimachi, T. Matsukage et al., “Focus on maximal miniaturisation of transradial coronary access materials and techniques by the Slender Club Japan and Europe: an overview and classification,” EuroIntervention, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 1178–1186, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. S. Takeshita, T. Shiono, A. Takagi, T. Ito, and S. Saito, “Percutaneous coronary intervention using a novel 4-French coronary accessor,” Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 222–227, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. K. Tobita, S. Takeshita, and S. Saito, “The 4-in-5 mother-child technique: 5 Fr transradial coronary intervention for complex lesions using a 4 Fr child catheter,” Journal of Invasive Cardiology, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 406–408, 2013. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. F. Yoshimachi, F. Kiemeneij, M. Masutani, T. Matsukage, A. Takahashi, and Y. Ikari, “Safety and feasibility of the new 5 Fr Glidesheath Slender,” Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 38–41, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus