Case Reports in Cardiology

Case Reports in Cardiology / 2017 / Article

Case Report | Open Access

Volume 2017 |Article ID 7065759 |

Candace Wu, Kamal Shemisa, "Sorafenib-Associated Heart Failure Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock after Treatment of Advanced Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Clinical Case Discussion", Case Reports in Cardiology, vol. 2017, Article ID 7065759, 9 pages, 2017.

Sorafenib-Associated Heart Failure Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock after Treatment of Advanced Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Clinical Case Discussion

Academic Editor: Kuan-Rau Chiou
Received01 Nov 2016
Accepted13 Apr 2017
Published27 Apr 2017


Background. Sorafenib, an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), targets multiple tyrosine kinase receptors (TKRs) involved in angiogenesis and tumor growth. Studies suggest that inhibition of TKR impacts cardiomyocyte survival. Inhibition of VEGF signaling interrupts angiogenesis and is associated with the development of hypertension and compensatory hypertrophy. Compensated hypertrophy ultimately leads to heart failure. Case Description. A 76-year-old man with a past medical history of systolic heart failure due to ischemic cardiomyopathy and stage IIIC hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) presented with symptoms of decompensated heart failure. Four months prior to admission, he was started on sorafenib. Results. Our patient was treated with intravenous furosemide and guideline directed therapy. Clinical status was complicated by the development of low cardiac output and shock requiring inotropic support. Careful titration of heart failure medication led to hemodynamic improvement and discontinuation of dobutamine. Conclusion. Greater awareness of sorafenib cardiotoxicity is essential. As TKI usage grows for treatment of cancers, heart failure-related complications will increase. In our patient, routine heart failure management and cessation of sorafenib led to clinical improvement. Future studies on the treatment of sorafenib cardiotoxicity should be explored further in this unique patient population.

1. Introduction

Sorafenib is an oral multikinase inhibitor that targets pathways involved in angiogenesis and tumor growth by inhibiting tyrosine kinase receptors and is recommended as a first-line drug for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma due to limited alternatives. The effect of sorafenib on the human body is not limited to hepatocellular cancer cells and has been linked to cardiovascular toxicity leading to the pathogenesis of clinical heart failure and resistant hypertension [1, 2].

This report presents the clinical case of a patient with ischemic cardiomyopathy and advanced HCC who was started on sorafenib and subsequently developed heart failure complicated by cardiogenic shock. We will review the clinical case, the biological basis for TKI cardiac toxicity, and the therapeutic challenges and considerations for the treatment of sorafenib-associated hypertension and heart failure.

2. Clinical Case

A 76-year-old man presented with worsening dyspnea at rest and on exertion, orthopnea, and lower extremity edema. The past medical history was significant for single-vessel coronary artery disease (s/p percutaneous coronary intervention), systolic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (LVEF 37%) due to ischemic cardiomyopathy, severe ventricular hypertrophy, chronic atrial fibrillation, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus type two, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and Stage IIIC hepatocellular carcinoma. Family history was positive for hypertension and diabetes mellitus type two. He was previously treated with guideline directed therapy for systolic heart failure (Table 1). The transthoracic echocardiogram was significant for moderately depressed left ventricular (LV) function, left atrial dilation, normal ventricular chamber dimensions, increased LV mass, and global hypokinesis (Figure 1).


Sorafenib200 mg by mouth twice daily
Carvedilol3.125 mg by mouth twice daily
Furosemide80 mg by mouth twice daily
Lisinopril10 mg by mouth daily
Aspirin81 mg by mouth daily
Warfarin2.5 mg by mouth daily
Nitroglycerin0.4 mg sublingual as needed

Eight months prior to admission, a cardiac MRI demonstrated findings suggestive of mild inferior wall myocardial ischemia on gadolinium imaging and moderately depressed systolic dysfunction. He was treated medically for ischemic heart failure without further risk stratification. Four months prior to admission, the patient was incidentally found to have a palpable right upper quadrant mass, which, by ultrasound, revealed a large heterogeneous echogenic density (measuring 13 cm). He underwent transhepatic biopsy and pathologic results were significant for poorly differentiated pleomorphic hepatocellular carcinoma. CT of the abdomen and pelvis was significant for tumor extension into the inferior vena cava and subdiaphragmatic space. A markedly elevated alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level (>10,000 ng/mL) was measured, suggestive of a high tumor burden.

His WHO cancer staging was Stage IIIC based on clinical as well as imaging findings. The 1-year survival of Stage IIIC HCC is 6–8 months for patients and the recommended treatment is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) called sorafenib, which extends median survival length to 10.7 months [3].

The patient presented to the emergency department hypertensive (169/79 mmHg) and tachycardic with a ventricular rate of 127 beats per minute (Figure 2). The physical exam was consistent with volume overload, and admission labs were notable for elevated BNP, abnormal BUN/creatinine, and elevated liver function tests (Table 2). Chest X-ray demonstrated cardiomegaly with pulmonary venous congestion and a moderate-sized right-sided pleural effusion.

Physical examVital signsBP 169/79 mmHg, HR 129 bpm
CardiovascularIrregularly irregular rhythm, tachycardic,
JVP 15 cm H2O with head of bed at 30 degrees
LungsSymmetric chest rise with bibasilar rales
Extremities3+ lower extremity pitting edema to the mid-shins bilaterally

Patient resultNormal

Laboratory resultsSodium139135–145 mEq/L
Potassium43.6–5.0 mEq/L
BUN217–21 mg/dL
Creatinine1.48<1 mg/dL
Magnesium1.61.4–1.8 mEq/L
BNP3298<100 pg/mL
Troponin I0.05<0.03
AST955–35 U/L
ALT607–56 U/L
Alkaline phosphatase23438–126 U/L
Total bilirubin4.20.2–1.3 mg/dL

The clinical exam was consistent with decompensated heart failure. The patient was treated with intravenous furosemide, carvedilol, and lisinopril. After sufficient diuresis (10 liters of fluid), clinical symptoms improved minimally (Table 3). However, within the subsequent 18 hours, the patient developed persistent hypotension (MAP 60 mmHg), worsening renal function, and cool extremities indicative of impending cardiogenic shock. He continued to have elevation of JVP on physical exam, which suggested restrictive filling of the right ventricle (RV) as well as RV failure. A pulse wave Doppler across the LVOT suggested diminished stroke volume after calculation of the LV velocity time integral (Figure 3). A right heart catheterization was subsequently performed which showed mildly elevated right- and left-sided ventricular filling pressure, pulmonary hypertension, and low cardiac output (Table 3). He was then treated with continuous infusion of dobutamine and furosemide. An EKG at the time demonstrated improvement of the ventricular rate without evidence of ST-T wave changes (Figure 4).


Physical examVital signs
MAP 59–62 mmHg, HR 92 bpm, RR 20/min
Right heart catheterizationMeasurements

GeneralWrapped in blankets including head. Appears fatigued.RA mean pressure8 mmHg
Head, neck, throatDry mucous membranes.RV pressure33/9 mmHg
CardiovascularIrregularly irregular. Parasternal holosystolic murmur. +RV gallop. JVP 20 cm H2O at 30 degrees.PA pressure32/23 mmHg, mean 27 mmHg
LungsCoarse breath sounds. No wheezes. Normal work of breathing.PCWP18 mmHg
AbdomenSoft, normoactive bowel sounds. Moderate to severe hepatomegaly with hepatojugular reflux.Pulmonary vascular resistance3.8 WU
Extremities2+ pitting edema to knees. No cyanosis or clubbing.Cardiac output (L/min)
(thermal dilution)
3.91 (L/min), Sv02-53%, Hgb 15.2
SkinSlightly cool extremities.Cardiac index1.70 L/min/m2


Physical examVital signs
MAP 72 mmHg, HR 85 bpm, RR 14/min
Right heart catheterizationMeasurements

GeneralBrighter affect.RA mean pressure5 mmHg
Head, neck, throatMoist mucous membranes.RV pressure26/5 mmHg
CardiovascularIrregularly irregular. Parasternal soft holosystolic murmur. JVP 8 cm H2O at 30 degrees.PA pressure26/15 mmHg,
mean 19 mmHg
LungsClear breath sounds. No wheezes. Normal work of breathing.PCWP12 mmHg
AbdomenSoft, normoactive bowel sounds. Moderate hepatomegaly with firm liver edges, absent hepatojugular reflux.Pulmonary vascular resistance1.4 WU
ExtremitiesNo edema, cyanosis, or clubbing.Cardiac output (L/min)
(thermal dilution)
5.3 (L/min), Sv02-75%,
Hgb 14.2
SkinPink fingertips and warm extremities.Cardiac index2.4 L/min/m2

Based on the antecedent history of recent initiation of sorafenib followed by deterioration in cardiac function, sorafenib-induced decompensated heart failure was diagnosed. This case report serves as an example of the therapeutic challenges of heart failure management in patients treated for hepatocellular carcinoma with sorafenib. The cardiac toxicity of sorafenib is known and while many patients who have preexisting heart failure are not initiated on tyrosine kinase inhibitors for this reason, limited therapies for cancers such as HCC may compel care providers to do so. Cautious clinical decision-making, heart failure follow-up, and recognition of higher risk groups in this unique subset of patients are needed. It is our goal to discuss the mechanism of sorafenib-associated cardiac toxicity and other tyrosine kinase inhibitors. We also review clinical strategies for treatment of heart failure complications.

3. Discussion

Sorafenib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets multiple tyrosine kinase receptors involved in angiogenesis and tumor growth and is recommended as a first-line drug for the treatment of advanced HCC [1]. In cancer cells, tyrosine kinase activity is increased due to mutations in the genes associated with the fundamental regulatory components of the enzyme. Mutations in cancer cells can also lead to overexpression of the tyrosine kinase genes. Tyrosine kinase inhibition is mediated through binding of a ligand or antibody (inhibitor), thus preventing the receptor from achieving its activated form. Autophosphorylation of the tyrosine kinase subsequently activates a series of protein kinase cascades in one of two dominant pathways involved in cell proliferation, hypertrophy, function, and survival. These are the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway via AKT or the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade via RAS and ERK (extracellular signal regulated kinase) [4, 5].

The Signaling Pathway of Tyrosine Kinases, Sites of Inhibition, and Cardiotoxicity Secondary to Trastuzumab following Treatment of HER2+ Breast Cancer. To further understand the reasons for sorafenib-associated cardiotoxicity, it is relevant to discuss the lessons learned from earlier generation TKIs, the exact cellular pathways affected, and the mechanisms behind the pathogenesis of clinical heart failure. Patients with ERBB2 receptor, also known as HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor), breast cancer that were receiving anthracycline-based chemotherapy were 3.5 times more likely (8% versus 27%, ) to develop asymptomatic cardiac dysfunction on echocardiography or clinical heart failure [6]. Clinically significant predictors for cardiac toxicity among several cohorts receiving trastuzumab were history of cardiac disease at baseline, treatment with anthracyclines, and age > 70 years [7, 8].

The true incidence of heart failure secondary to trastuzumab alone was likely unknown due to treatment confounding with anthracyclines and taxanes. Assessing the true clinical risk of cardiomyopathy among patients receiving trastuzumab has therefore led to clinical trials with prespecified cardiac end points which estimate the incidence to be less frequent when administered alone (4–7%) [9, 10]. Clinical follow-up data from these trials further demonstrated that trastuzumab cardiac toxicity is reversible shortly after discontinuation and may be responsive to medical therapy [11]. This would suggest that the severity of cardiac toxicity secondary to TKIs is most pronounced when the cardiac myocyte is simultaneously weakened by another process that creates an energy deficit, and, subsequently, the required metabolic signaling needed to maintain survival is hindered through the disruption of these critical pathways. As will be described, the degree of cardiac toxicity caused by TKIs depends on the inhibitory effect on the dominant signaling pathway of the cardiac myocyte, the selectivity of tyrosine kinase inhibition, the concomitant treatment with older cardiotoxic chemotherapeutic agents, anthracyclines or taxanes, and the duration of treatment [10, 12].

Tyrosine Kinase Inhibition Promotes an Energy Deficit and Interferes with Cardiac Myocyte Survival Pathways. TKIs are considered very effective in the treatment of the respective cancers but, as was described, can have deleterious effects on the cardiovascular system. Both clinical experiences followed by basic investigations regarding deficient cellular signaling due to trastuzumab and bevacizumab have furthered our understanding of the importance of tyrosine kinase signaling in the pathogenesis of heart failure and hypertension in patients receiving these treatments for cancer. As newer TKIs are being developed, there is greater scrutiny for reporting adverse cardiovascular events during clinical trials. In the search for better and more effective anticancer drugs, multikinase inhibitors were developed to achieve greater inhibition of TKR and downstream signaling. The ultimate effect of less selectivity is the shutting down of signaling, ATP utilization, and the cell machinery for cell division. Sorafenib, a multikinase inhibitor, was designed for the inhibition of cell proliferation.

Studies that have elucidated the cellular mechanisms behind cardiotoxicity due to sorafenib suggest that inhibition of RAF-1 and B-RAF kinase impact cardiomyocyte survival (Figure 5) [12]. RAF-1 signaling phosphorylates a series of kinases in the MAPK group, MEK1 and ERK1, which potentiates cardiac myocyte hypertrophic growth and survival [13, 14].

The RAF-1 kinase also inhibits cell death pathways mediated by apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 (ASK1) as well as mammalian sterile 20 kinase 2 (MST2). Both ASK1 and MST2 are proapoptotic kinases and have roles in oxidant stress-induced injury. Deletions of RAF-1 in the heart result in ventricular dilation, reduced contractility, and increased cell death [12, 15]. When mice with deleted RAF-1 are subjected to pressure overload, cardiomyocyte death was increased, indicating that RAF-1 kinase activity may be cardioprotective [16].

Nonselective TKIs such as sorafenib that target multiple kinases have great potential for intracellular toxicity. Myocardial cells require greater energy demands than other cells and therefore are particularly sensitive to deficiencies in energy production. Some case reports have indicated the potential for reversibility of sorafenib-induced cardiomyopathy after discontinuation though it is unclear to what extent or after what duration of treatment that reversibility is still feasible [17].

Mechanism of Cardiotoxicity after Treatment with Sorafenib May Be In Part due to VEGF Inhibition. TKRs were initially noted to enhance gene expression and protein synthesis involved in cardiac hypertrophy [18]. Deleterious effects on the cardiovascular system were observed with inhibition of VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) and PDGF (platelet derived growth factor) receptors. Inhibition of VEGF signaling with bevacizumab was shown to increase vascular tone and disrupt microvascular blood flow [19, 20]. Clinical consequences of disrupting VEGF signaling include a higher risk for worsening hypertension and a twofold greater risk for heart failure among patients with cancers of solid tumor origin [21, 22]. Among patients undergoing treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with sorafenib, 68% had some form of cardiovascular toxicity, with most cases (59%) having worsened hypertension. Newly diagnosed heart failure, defined as an elevation in NT-proBNP and a decline in LVEF, occurred in 40% of patients on sunitinib and in 4% of patients on sorafenib [2]. In a meta-analysis of 21 randomized controlled trials with patients undergoing treatment of HCC, there was a 2.7-fold greater heart failure risk in those that received TKIs compared to those who did not (2.39% versus 0.75%, ) [23].

Therapeutic Challenges and Considerations in the Treatment of Hypertension. Hepatocellular carcinoma is one of the most common cancers in the world and typically presents in advanced stages. Standard treatments during early stages include partial hepatectomy, local ablation, and liver transplantation. Sorafenib is recommended as a first-line drug for the treatment of advanced HCC [1, 2].

In the case of sorafenib-induced hypertension, blood pressure is treated with conventional therapy and appears not to impact or worsen progression-free survival among patients treated for metastatic RCC [24]. Early intervention of hypertension is essential to reduce subsequent risks of developing cardiomyopathy and heart failure. The Angiogenesis Task Force of the National Cancer Institute Investigational Drug Steering Committee recommends regular blood pressure monitoring before treatment as well as during treatment, weekly during the first cycle and then every 2-3 weeks, with a goal BP of less than 140/90 mmHg for most patients and a goal BP of less than 130/80 for those with diabetes or chronic kidney disease [25]. Sorafenib is also associated with the development of proteinuria, and it is recommended that urine protein be tested before and after treatment initiation. When patients develop proteinuria, clinicians should strive to control blood pressure with either angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) or dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (CCB), which have been recommended as first- and second-line agents (Figure 6) [26]. Treatment with ACE-I is contraindicated if patients develop hyperkalemia, severe cough, or angioedema or have advanced chronic kidney disease. Transitioning to angiotensin receptor blocker is possible in those patients intolerant to ACE-I though clinical data is limited. Discontinuation of sorafenib can be considered in patients with resistant hypertension.

Therapeutic Challenges and Considerations in the Treatment of Systolic Heart Failure. Although it is typically recommended that chemotherapy be discontinued when significant heart failure develops, case reports have shown that sorafenib can be used to treat advanced HCC for as long as 12 months and may be reduced in those that develop heart failure [1]. It is difficult to know which heart failure medications would benefit patients exposed to TKIs. Very few clinical studies have investigated the treatment of heart failure due to TKIs in a prospective fashion. Newer generation TKIs are less selective than their predecessors, and while the cancer cell growth is strongly halted, the potential for cardiac toxicity is higher. At this time there are no medications that specifically target and reverse TKI-related cardiotoxicity. The ACC/AHA guidelines recommend that patients receiving chemotherapeutic agents should be monitored carefully. A baseline echocardiogram prior to treatment with TKIs in patients with cardiac risk factors and close follow-up in monitoring for heart failure symptoms is appropriate [27, 28].

In patients that develop clinical heart failure or systolic dysfunction on echocardiography, treatment with a combination of guideline directed ACE-I, and beta-blockers have been shown to reduce heart failure-associated mortality and improve cardiovascular morbidity [27]. The most well studied agents in the treatment of anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy are carvedilol and enalapril though the mechanism, severity, and toxicity of anthracyclines differ from the cardiotoxicity of TKIs [29, 30]. Aldosterone antagonists have also been shown to further reduce mortality in advanced heart failure in patients with systolic heart failure, LVEF < 35%, and NYHA III-IV. Treatment of salt and water retention in systolic heart failure is further treated with loop diuretics. Implantable defibrillators used as primary prevention for sudden cardiac death are recommended in those with greater than a 1-year life expectancy with persistently severe LV dysfunction for greater than three months despite optimal medical therapy. In patients that develop heart failure symptoms and successfully complete treatment with TKIs, follow-up echocardiography is appropriate to assess for reversal of LV dysfunction [26].

Dobutamine Treatment May Be Considered in Those with Severe Heart Failure. Baseline diminished contractile reserve with subsequent exposure to sorafenib led to the development of cardiogenic shock in our patient who was subsequently treated with dobutamine, an inotrope with weaker chronotropic effects, which successfully restored a normal hemodynamic profile. While it is well known that inotropic support is associated with adverse long-term cardiovascular outcomes, the clinical efficacy of inotropes after exposure to cardiac toxic medications is unknown. Dobutamine’s pharmacologic function does not depend on tyrosine kinases but rather on G-protein coupled receptors. Whether sensitivity to beta-1 adrenergic activation by dobutamine is increased after tyrosine kinase inhibition is unknown. In response to isoproterenol, the presence of genistein was shown to potentiate beta-adrenergic sensitivity in the heart of animal models [31].

4. Conclusion

In our patient with underlying ischemic cardiomyopathy and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, the management of heart failure in the setting of coexisting malignancy poses interesting and new clinical challenges. Sorafenib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets multiple tyrosine kinase receptors involved in angiogenesis and tumor growth. Unfortunately, sorafenib-associated cardiotoxic effects such as hypertension, reduced LVEF, and heart failure are of great concern and contribute to the challenging nature of HCC management. It is essential that TKI-induced hypertension be treated aggressively with standard treatments and regular monitoring. Guidelines also recommend echocardiogram monitoring for patients started on chemotherapeutic agents, especially those with cardiac risk factors, prior to treatment initiation, once heart failure symptoms develop, and after treatment completion. There are currently no specific recommendations for managing TKI-induced heart failure, and patients are typically managed with standard heart failure treatments. Beta-adrenergic effects of dobutamine may actually be potentiated by tyrosine kinase inhibition.

We initially considered more common causes for heart failure exacerbation in our patient. Patients with restrictive heart failure often develop worsened heart failure symptoms due to sustained periods of atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response. Prior to hospitalization, however, the patient’s ventricular rate was well controlled with beta blockade, and it is our belief that the interval decline in ventricular function led to increased left atrial pressure and presentation of atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response. Furthermore, there were no EKG abnormalities suggestive of myocardial infarction or evidence of severe valvular regurgitation on echocardiography. There was the possibility that overdiuresis due to an inability to accurately estimate the filling pressures on physical exam led to inadequate preload leading to low cardiac output shock. However, the patient’s right heart catheterization reflected that the filling pressures remained elevated after diuresis and that the etiology of low cardiac output was mainly attributed to diminished contractility.

After successful titration of guideline directed treatment and discontinuation of dobutamine, a repeat echo demonstrated baseline LV function. A repeat trial of sorafenib at a lower dose was offered to the patient but was declined. Although sorafenib is the potential predisposing factor for the patient’s decompensation, the causal relationship between this drug and heart failure is still unclear since rechallenge was not performed. The patient was discharged home with palliative care follow-up for coordination of hospice.


ACC:American College of Cardiology
ACE-I:Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors
AHA:American Heart Association
ASK1:Apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1
BP:Blood pressure
BPM:Beats per minute
CCB:Calcium channel blocker
EGFR:Epidermal growth factor receptor
ERK:Extracellular signal regulated kinase
HCC:Hepatocellular carcinoma
HER2:Human epidermal growth factor receptor
JVP:Jugular venous pressure
LV:Left ventricle
LVEF:Left ventricular ejection fraction
MAP:Mean arterial pressure
MAPK:Mitogen-activated protein kinase
MST2:Mammalian sterile 20 kinase 2
MRI:Magnetic resonance imaging
NT-proBNP:N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide
NYHA:New York Heart Association
PA:Pulmonary artery
PCWP:Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure
RAF1:Rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma
RCC:Renal cell carcinoma
RHC:Right heart catheterization
RV:Right ventricle
TACE:Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization
TKI:Tyrosine kinase inhibitor
TKR:Tyrosine kinase receptor
VEGF:Vascular endothelial growth factor
VEGFR:Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor
WHO:World Health Organization.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.


  1. C. Valsuani, O. Siclari, A. Camerini et al., “Sorafenib in a patient with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and serious impairment of left ventricular function: a case report,” Cases Journal, vol. 2, no. 12, article no. 9133, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. P. S. Hall, L. C. Harshman, S. Srinivas, and R. M. Witteles, “The frequency and severity of cardiovascular toxicity from targeted therapy in advanced renal cell carcinoma patients,” JACC: Heart Failure, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 72–78, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. J. M. Llovet, S. Ricci, V. Mazzaferro et al., “Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 359, no. 4, pp. 378–390, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. G. Condorelli, A. Drusco, G. Stassi et al., “Akt induces enhanced myocardial contractility and cell size in vivo in transgenic mice,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 99, no. 19, pp. 12333–12338, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. T. Yamazaki, I. Komuro, and Y. Yazaki, “Signalling pathways for cardiac hypertrophy,” Cellular Signalling, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 693–698, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. A. Cobleigh, C. L. Vogel, D. Tripathy et al., “Multinational study of the efficacy and safety of humanized anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody in women who have HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer that has progressed after chemotherapy for metastatic disease,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 2639–2648, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. M. Rossi, G. Carioli, M. Bonifazi et al., “Trastuzumab for HER2+ metastatic breast cancer in clinical practice: cardiotoxicity and overall survival,” European Journal of Cancer, vol. 52, pp. 41–49, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. M. Bonifazi, M. Franchi, M. Rossi et al., “Trastuzumab-related cardiotoxicity in early breast cancer: a cohort study,” Oncologist, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 795–801, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. M. Procter, T. M. Suter, E. de Azambuja et al., “Longer-term assessment of trastuzumab-related cardiac adverse events in the Herceptin Adjuvant (HERA) trial,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 28, no. 21, pp. 3422–3428, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. X. Pivot, T. Suter, J. M. Nabholtz et al., “Cardiac toxicity events in the PHARE trial, an adjuvant trastuzumab randomised phase III study,” European Journal of Cancer, vol. 51, no. 13, article 9505, pp. 1660–1666, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. E. De Azambuja, M. J. Procter, D. J. Van Veldhuisen et al., “Trastuzumab-associated cardiac events at 8 years of median follow-up in the herceptin adjuvant trial (BIG 1-01),” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 32, no. 20, pp. 2159–2165, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. T. Force, D. S. Krause, and R. A. Van Etten, “Molecular mechanisms of cardiotoxicity of tyrosine kinase inhibition,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 332–344, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. O. F. Bueno, L. J. De Windt, K. M. Tymitz et al., “The MEK1-ERK1/2 signaling pathway promotes compensated cardiac hypertrophy in transgenic mice,” The European Molecular Biology Organization Journal, vol. 19, pp. 6341–6350, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. B. B. Hasinoff, D. Patel, and X. Wu, “The dual-targeted HER1/HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor lapatinib strongly potentiates the cardiac myocyte-damaging effects of doxorubicin,” Cardiovascular Toxicology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 33–47, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. O. Yamaguchi, T. Watanabe, K. Nishida et al., “Cardiac-specific disruption of the c-raf-1 gene induces cardiac dysfunction and apoptosis,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 114, no. 7, pp. 937–943, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. I. S. Harris, S. Zhang, I. Treskov, A. Kovacs, C. Weinheimer, and A. J. Muslin, “Raf-1 kinase is required for cardiac hypertrophy and cardiomyocyte survival in response to pressure overload,” Circulation, vol. 110, no. 6, pp. 718–723, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. H. Park, S.-H. Han, H. Kang, and K. Park, “A case of reversible cardiomyopathy associated with sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma,” International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 160, no. 1, pp. e10–e11, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. S. Rohrbach, X. Yan, E. O. Weinberg et al., “Neuregulin in cardiac hypertrophy in rats with aortic stenosis: differential expression of erbB2 and erbB4 receptors,” Circulation, vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 407–412, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. A. M. J. Thijs, C. M. L. Van Herpen, F. C. G. J. Sweep et al., “Role of endogenous vascular endothelial growth factor in endothelium-dependent vasodilation in humans,” Hypertension, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 1060–1065, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. J.-J. Mourad, G. des Guetz, H. Debbabi, and B. I. Levy, “Blood pressure rise following angiogenesis inhibition by bevacizumab. A crucial role for microcirculation,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 927–934, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. W.-X. Qi, S. Fu, Q. Zhang, and X.-M. Guo, “Bevacizumab increases the risk of severe congestive heart failure in cancer patients: an up-to-date meta-analysis with a focus on different subgroups,” Clinical Drug Investigation, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 681–690, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. C. P. Escalante, Y. C. Chang, K. Liao et al., “Meta-analysis of cardiovascular toxicity risks in cancer patients on selected targeted agents,” Supportive Care in Cancer, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 4057–4074, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. P. Ghatalia, C. J. Morgan, Y. Je et al., “Congestive heart failure with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors,” Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 228–237, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. S. Szmit, P. Langiewicz, J. Zlnierek, P. Nurzynski, M. Zaborowska, K. J. Filipiak et al., “Hypertension as a predictive factor for survival outcomes in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sunitinib after progression on cytokines.,” in Kidney And Blood Pressure Research, vol. 35, pp. 18–25, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  25. D. J. Lenihan and P. R. Kowey, “Overview and management of cardiac adverse events associated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors,” Oncologist, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 900–908, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. B. Ky, P. Vejpongsa, E. T. H. Yeh, T. Force, and J. J. Moslehi, “Emerging paradigms in cardiomyopathies associated with cancer therapies,” Circulation Research, vol. 113, no. 6, pp. 754–764, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. W. C. Yancy, M. Jessup, B. Bozkurt et al., “Guideline for the management of heart failure,” Circulation, vol. 128, pp. e240–e327, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. R. C. Hendel, M. R. Patel, C. M. Kramer, M. Poon, J. C. Carr, N. A. Gerstad et al., “ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 48, pp. 1475–1497, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  29. Y.-L. Chen, S.-Y. Chung, H.-T. Chai et al., “Early administration of carvedilol protected against doxorubicin-induced cardiomyopathy,” Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 355, no. 3, pp. 516–527, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. G. Janbabai, M. Nabati, M. Faghihinia, S. Azizi, S. Borhani, and J. Yazdani, “Effect of enalapril on preventing anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy,” Cardiovascular Toxicology, pp. 1–10, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. L. C. Hool, L. M. Middleton, and R. D. Harvey, “Genistein increases the sensitivity of cardiac ion channels to β-adrenergic receptor stimulation,” Circulation Research, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 33–42, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2017 Candace Wu and Kamal Shemisa. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles