Clinical and Genetic Analysis of a Nonsyndromic Oligodontia in a Child
The etiology of tooth agenesis may be related to several factors, among them, the genetic alterations that play a fundamental role in the development of this dental anomaly, so that knowledge about it helps the clinician to have a greater understanding of their patients. Thus, the aim of this study was to report the case of a nonsyndromic child, with tooth agenesis of one premolar, three first permanent molars, and all second permanent molars. In addition, a genetic research between polymorphic variants in genes MMP3 and BMP2 was performed in order to observe the association between changes in these genes and congenital tooth absences. For this purpose, DNA from child was extracted and polymorphisms were investigated. It was clinically and radiographically observed that this was a case of oligodontia, in which the authors suggested an association between the polymorphisms found and tooth agenesis diagnosed in that child.
Tooth agenesis may be defined as the congenital absence of one or more teeth, with the exception of third molars, with this being one of the most prevalent dental developmental anomalies, with rates ranging from 3.2% to 13.3% in different populations . When the number of absent teeth exceeds the value of 6 elements, the term used for cases of congenital absences is oligodontia, while anodontia represents the complete congenital absence of teeth . The etiology of congenital tooth absence may be related to genetic, nutritional, traumatic, infectious, and hereditary factors, with the latter being considered the main etiologic factor of this condition . According to Lexner et al. , tooth agenesis is frequently found in individual with genetic syndromes or disorders or in fissure patients, or it may even occur as an isolated case [2, 5].
When considering isolated cases or the nonsyndromic form, many studies have investigated the correlation between tooth agenesis and genetic mutations present in individuals belonging to one and the same family, attributing the mutations to genes PAX9, MSX1, AXIN2, and EDA [6–9]. However, many oligodontia families reported in the literature could not be identified as having any mutations in these genes [10, 11]. According to Küchler et al. , variations in genes that are critical for tooth formation may contribute to the tooth agenesis. In a recent study , the authors affirmed that polymorphism in BMP2 contributed to isolated cases of tooth agenesis. Also, MMPs are potential candidate genes for dental alterations based on the roles they play during embryogenesis . Letra et al.  observed an association between a MMP3 polymorphism and cleft lip and/or palate.
Since lip, palate, and tooth development are influenced by the same genes, the aim of the present study was to report the case of a child with oligodontia, in whom an investigation between the polymorphic variants in genes MMP3 and BMP2 was performed.
2. Case Report
A 9-year-old girl, leukoderma, presented at the Pediatric Dental Clinic of “Universidade Veiga de Almeida,” accompanied by her guardian, with the complaint of misaligned teeth. A term of consent was obtained, authorizing the present case report to be made. Her medical history revealed a normal birth, presenting absence of systemic compromise or any other relevant datum. On extraoral clinical exam as well, no alteration was observed. Considering the dental history, it was revealed that the child had already been submitted to dental appointments only to have prophylaxis and fluoride application.
After meticulous intraoral clinical exam, it was found that the child was at the stage of mixed dentition, with absence of three first permanent molars, deviation from the midline, bilateral posterior crossbite, and deep palate (Figure 1). After radiographic exam, the following tooth absences were confirmed: elements 16, 26, and 46 and the tooth germs of element 15 and all the permanent second molars (Figure 2). According to her guardian’s report, other members of the family presented tooth agenesis, such as the patient’s paternal grandmother, uncle, and aunt, as well as her father (Figure 3).
It is worth adding that the patient was referred for orthodontic treatment, and at the appropriate age, after correcting the bone and tooth discrepancies, she will undergo prosthetic rehabilitation. In addition, follow-up consultations will be scheduled regularly for oral hygiene instructions.
3. Genetic Analysis
Epithelial cells from the oral mucosa were collected as a source of genomic DNA, following a procedure based on a previously published protocol . Only the DNA sample with a ratio of 260/280 above 1.8 was analyzed. Two markers in the 2 genes (Table 1) were genotyped by polymerase chain-reactions with the TaqMan method , with specific probes for allelic distinction, performed with the Stratagene Mx3005P real-time PCR system (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA). Predesigned probes were supplied by Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA, USA).
4. Results of Selection of Candidate Genes and Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms
We selected genes involved in craniofacial development and a polymorphism (rs522616) that was previously investigated in a Brazilian population affected by oral clefts. According to Letra et al.  a genetic marker in MMP3 (rs522616) showed significant association with all cleft types in individuals from Brazil. In addition, the ancestral allele (A) in this polymorphism was associated with increased risk of oral clefts. Our genetic analysis found the genotype AA for the patient analyzed. In other words, the child carried two copies of the A allele associated with oral clefts.
Considering gene BMP2, a recent study  identified this gene with a role in skeletal development. Craniosynostosis (CS), the premature closure of one or more of the cranial vault sutures, is a common congenital anomaly. According to Justice et al.  the same polymorphism studied here (rs1884302) was considered the most significant SNP for this malformation. The minor allele C was associated with the disease. Our analysis revealed the CC genotype. We hypothesized that the child carries two copies of the C allele, the minor allele probably being associated with a congenital malformation.
Candidate genes, such as PAX9, MSX1, AXIN2, and EDA [6–9, 19–24], are related to etiology of tooth agenesis. However, other genes are being investigated for the same condition. Among them, the matrix metalloproteinase genes (MMPs) are outstanding, due to the important function of these enzymes during craniofacial development  and also the BMPs (bone morphogenetic protein genes) that participate directly in the cascades of events during the initial stages of odontogenesis . In the present case report, the polymorphisms rs522616 (MMP3)  and rs1884304 (BMP2) , which are functional polymorphisms, were selected. Letra et al.  affirmed that although the exact function has not been elucidated the variant rs522616 (MMP3) is located in the gene promoter and has regulatory effect on gene transcription and function. A recent study  suggests that the A allele can enhance promoter activity, possible augmenting transcription factor binding. Also, Mu et al. , using bioinformatics, found that a BMP2 polymorphism exhibited different BMP2 mRNA structures, and the G allele required more energy for mRNA secondary structure stabilization than the A allele did.
The functional SNPs were chosen due to the fact of being capable of influencing genic expression, increasing or diminishing the final quantity of protein coded by that gene . A recent study  also suggested that gene BMP2 is strongly associated with cleft lips and that cases of absent teeth are directly related to the severity of the cleft found in the patient . In the same way, Küchler et al.  affirmed that polymorphisms in gene MMP3 were also associated with cleft lips and palates and this evidence came from studies that also showed association with tooth agenesis . Bartzela et al.  also stated that the frequency of dental anomalies seems to be linked to the severity of the cleft malformation. After performing the exams of the child in this report, no type of cleft palate was found.
Apart from the literature cited, it is important to stress the point that dental anomalies including tooth agenesis are subclinical phenotypes (mild forms) of over clefts mainly observed in unaffected relatives . It is worth adding that, in spite of the genetic investigations of the present case having demonstrated polymorphisms in both gene MMP3 and BMP2, these results must be interpreted with caution, because it is an isolated case in which the genetic evaluation was not performed in the entire family. For this reason, previous studies [13, 15, 16] in the literature were consulted so that a possible association between the alterations verified and the ageneses could be established. An extensive search of the literature was conducted, but no other study was found with polymorphisms in the studied genes and patients with tooth ageneses.
The diagnosis of tooth agenesis is dependent on the anamnesis and clinical and radiographic exams being performed with acuity by the dentist. Moreover, in the early diagnosis of tooth agenesis, it has become imperative to use panoramic radiographs. This exam was requested in order to make the diagnosis of the tooth absences in the present case, in which ageneses of the following permanent teeth were found: maxillary left second premolar, maxillary right and left first molars, mandibular right first molar, and all second molars. The prevalence of absence of second premolars, lateral incisors , and third molars  was remarkable. However, ageneses of first and second molars, as in the present report, are rare conditions. According to Abe et al. , the prevalence of absence of maxillary first molars is 0.5%.
According to the literature , there is a high prevalence of ageneses of permanent first molars in a symmetrical manner in the maxillary arch. However, nothing was found with respect to the bilateralism of absences of this same tooth in the mandibular arch. The child investigated in this study presented symmetrical or bilateral absences of permanent first molars in the maxilla, whereas, in the mandible, there is agenesis only of the permanent right first molar.
When we consider the ageneses of the permanent second molar germs, we should take into consideration that Moyers  reported the beginning of development of the permanent second molars at 3 years of age for both genders. Therefore, at 9 years of age, these germs would already be visible radiographically, and for this reason the authors of this report also affirmed that the child presented absences of these teeth.
The inevitable consequences of oligodontias include malocclusions due to the inadequate position of the teeth during growth, deficiency of the alveolar processes due to the lack of teeth, and excess of spaces between the dental arches . In the present case, all the abovementioned characteristics were evident, so that this patient was indicated for orthodontic treatment. Moreover, at an appropriate age, this patient will also be prosthetically rehabilitated.
In summary, tooth ageneses constitute a clinical and public health problem, because patients in these conditions may suffer a reduction in their masticatory capacity, malocclusions, phonoaudiological problems, and compromised esthetics. These problems may also affect the behavioral pattern and social life of these persons, so that early diagnosis and guidance with regard to treatment are necessary, thus being a condition that pediatric dentists must be capable of diagnosing.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
The authors would like to thank FAPERJ for financial support.
Z. S. M. Albashaireh and Y. S. Khader, “The prevalence and pattern of hypodontia of the permanent teeth and crown size and shape deformity affecting upper lateral incisors in a sample of Jordanian dental patients,” Community Dental Health, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 239–243, 2006.View at: Google Scholar
B. A. Ramazanzadeh, F. Ahrari, and S. Hajian, “Evaluation of tooth size in patients with congenitally-missing teeth,” Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 36–41, 2013.View at: Google Scholar
M. Kulkarni, T. Agrawal, and S. Kheur, “Tooth agenesis: newer concept,” The Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 65–69, 2011.View at: Google Scholar
M. O. Lexner, A. Bardow, J. M. Hertz, L. A. Nielsen, and S. Kreiborg, “Anomalies of tooth formation in hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia,” International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 10–18, 2007.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Shapira, E. Lubit, and M. M. Kuftinec, “Hypodontia in children with various types of clefts,” Angle Orthodontist, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 16–21, 2000.View at: Google Scholar
M. H. van den Boogaard, M. Dorland, F. A. Beemer, and H. K. P. Van Amstel, “MSX1 mutation is associated with orofacial clefting and tooth agenesis in humans,” Nature Genetics, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 342–343, 2000.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Nieminen, “Genetic basis of tooth agenesis,” Journal of Experimental Zoology B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution, vol. 312, no. 4, pp. 320–342, 2009.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. D. Mu, Z. Xu, C. I. Contreras, J. S. McDaniel, K. J. Donly, and S. Chen, “Mutational analysis of AXIN2, MSX1, and PAX9 in two Mexican oligodontia families,” Genetics and Molecular Research, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 4446–4458, 2013.View at: Google Scholar
Y. Yang, L. Luo, J. Xu et al., “Novel EDA p.Ile260Ser mutation linked to non-syndromic hypodontia,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 92, no. 6, pp. 500–506, 2013.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. M. Scarel, P. C. Trevilatto, O. Hipólito Jr., L. E. Camargo, and S. R. Line, “Absence of mutations in the homeodomain of the MSX1 gene in patients with hypodontia,” American Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 92, no. 5, pp. 346–349, 2000.View at: Google Scholar
A. Gerits, P. Nieminen, S. De Muynck, and C. Carels, “Exclusion of coding region mutations in MSX1, PAX9 and AXIN2 in eight patients with severe oligodontia phenotype,” Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 129–136, 2006.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. C. Küchler, R. Menezes, N. Callahan et al., “MMP1 and MMP20 contribute to tooth agenesis in humans,” Archives of Oral Biology, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 506–511, 2011.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. M. Justice, G. Yagnik, Y. Kim et al., “A genome-wide association study identifies susceptibility loci for nonsyndromic sagittal craniosynostosis near BMP2 and within BBS9,” Nature Genetics, vol. 44, no. 12, pp. 1360–1364, 2012.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Letra, R. A. Silva, R. Menezes et al., “MMP gene polymorphisms as contributors for cleft lip/palate: association with MMP3 but not MMP1,” Archives of Oral Biology, vol. 52, no. 10, pp. 954–960, 2007.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Letra, R. M. Silva, L. G. Motta et al., “Association of MMP3 and TIMP2 promoter polymorphisms with nonsyndromic oral clefts,” Birth Defects Research Part A—Clinical and Molecular Teratology, vol. 94, no. 7, pp. 540–548, 2012.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Letra, M. Zhao, R. M. Silva, A. R. Vieira, and J. T. Hecht, “Functional significance of MMP3 and TIMP2 polymorphisms in cleft lip/palate,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 93, no. 7, pp. 651–656, 2014.View at: Google Scholar
M. Aidar and S. R. P. Line, “A simple and cost-effective protocol for DNA isolation from buccal epithelial cells,” Brazilian Dental Journal, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 148–152, 2007.View at: Google Scholar
K. Ranade, M. Chang, C. Ting et al., “High-throughput genotyping with single nucleotide polymorphisms,” Genome Research, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 1262–1268, 2001.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. L. Klein, P. Nieminen, L. Lammi, E. Niebuhr, and S. Kreiborg, “Novel mutation of the initiation codon of PAX9 causes oligodontia,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 43–47, 2005.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Hansen, S. Kreiborg, H. Jarlov, E. Niebuhr, and H. Eiberg, “A novel nonsense mutation in PAX9 is associated with marked variability in number of missing teeth,” European Journal of Oral Sciences, vol. 115, no. 4, pp. 330–333, 2007.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Vastardis, N. Karimbux, S. W. Guthua, J. G. Seidman, and C. E. Seidman, “A human MSX1 homeodomain missense mutation causes selective tooth agenesis,” Nature Genetics, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 417–421, 1996.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. C. Lidral and B. C. Reising, “The role of MSX1 in human tooth agenesis,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 274–278, 2002.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. De Muynck, E. Schollen, G. Matthijs, A. Verdonck, K. Devriendt, and C. Carels, “A novel MSX1 mutation in hypodontia,” American Journal of Medical Genetics A, vol. 128, no. 4, pp. 401–403, 2004.View at: Google Scholar
J. Kim, J. P. Simmer, B. P.-L. Lin, F. Seymen, J. D. Bartlett, and J. C.-C. Hu, “Mutational analysis of candidate genes in 24 amelogenesis imperfecta families,” European Journal of Oral Sciences, vol. 114, no. 1, pp. 3–12, 2006.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Iamaroon, U. M. Wallon, C. M. Overall, and V. M. Diewert, “Expression of 72-kDa gelatinase (matrix metalloproteinase-2) in the developing mouse craniofacial complex,” Archives of Oral Biology, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 1109–1119, 1996.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. S. Shastry, “SNPs and haplotypes: genetic markers for disease and drug response (review),” International Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 379–382, 2003.View at: Google Scholar
T. Sahoo, A. Theisen, P. A. Sanchez-Lara et al., “Microdeletion 20p12.3 involving BMP2 contributes to syndromic forms of cleft palate,” The American Journal of Medical Genetics A, vol. 155, no. 7, pp. 1646–1653, 2011.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Karsten and M. Larson, “The relationship between hypodontia in the second premolar region and heredity of cleft, lip and palate in children with isolated cleft palate,” Swedish Dental Journal, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 47–52, 2004.View at: Google Scholar
T. N. Bartzela, C. E. L. Carels, E. M. Bronkhorst, E. Rønning, S. Rizell, and A. M. Kuijpers-Jagtman, “Tooth agenesis patterns in bilateral cleft lip and palate,” European Journal of Oral Sciences, vol. 118, no. 1, pp. 47–52, 2010.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. N. Ng'ang'a and P. M. Ng'ang'a, “Hypodontia of permanent teeth in a Kenyan population,” East African Medical Journal, vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 200–203, 2001.View at: Google Scholar
R. Abe, T. Endo, and S. Shimooka, “Maxillary first molar agenesis and other dental anomalies,” The Angle Orthodontist, vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 1002–1009, 2010.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. E. Moyers, Handbook of Orthodontics, Year Book Medical Publishers, Chicago, Ill, USA, 3rd edition, 1988.