Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Case Reports in Dentistry
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 327368, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/327368
Case Report

Digital Device in Postextraction Implantology: A Clinical Case Presentation

1School of Oral Surgery, Istituto Stomatologico Italiano, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
2Department of Oral Rehabilitation, Istituto Stomatologico Italiano, Milan, Italy
3Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milan, Italy

Received 21 September 2014; Revised 28 November 2014; Accepted 10 December 2014; Published 29 December 2014

Academic Editor: Konstantinos Michalakis

Copyright © 2014 A. E. Borgonovo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. F. Duret, J. L. Blouin, and B. Duret, “CAD-CAM in dentistry,” The Journal of the American Dental Association, vol. 117, no. 6, pp. 715–720, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. G. Priest, “Virtual-designed and computer-milledimplantabutments,” Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 63, pp. 22–32, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  3. W. H. Mörmann, “The origin of the Cerecmethod: a personal reviewof the first 5 years,” International Journal of Computerized Dentistry, vol. 7, pp. 11–24, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  4. G. Juodzbalys and H. L. Wang, “Socket morphology-based treatment for implant esthetics: a pilot study,” The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 970–978, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  5. J. Y. Kan, K. Rungcharassaeng, M. Ojano, and C. J. Goodacre, “Flapless anterior implant surgery: a surgical and prosthodontic rationale,” Practical Periodontics and Aesthetic Dentistry, vol. 12, pp. 467–474, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  6. T. Wu, W. Liao, N. Dai, and C. Tang, “Design of a custom angledabutment for dentalimplantsusing computer -aided designand nonlinear finite elementanalysis,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 43, pp. 1941–1946, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  7. R. B. Kerstein, F. Castellucci, and J. Osorio, “Ideal gingival form with computer-generated permanent healing abutments,” Compendium of Continuing Education in Dentistry, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 793–802, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  8. G. Priest, “Virtual-designed and computer-milled implant abutments,” The Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 63, no. 9, supplement 2, pp. 22–32, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  9. L. Canullo, G. Iurlaro, and G. Iannello, “Double-blind randomized controlled trial study on post-extraction immediately restored implants using the switching platform concept: soft tissue response. Preliminary report,” Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 20, pp. 414–420, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  10. F. S. Ribeiro, A. E. F. Pontes, E. Marcantonio, A. Piattelli, and R. J. B. Neto, “Success rate of immediate nonfunctional loaded single-tooth implants: immediate versus delayed implantation,” Implant Dentistry, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 109–117, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. L. V. Bogaerde, B. Rangert, and I. Wendelhag, “Immediate/early function of Brånemark System TiUnite implants in fresh extraction sockets in maxillae and posterior mandibles: an 18-month prospective clinical study,” Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, vol. 7, supplement 1, pp. S121–S130, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  12. S. T. Chen, J. Beagle, S. S. Jensen, M. Chiapasco, and I. Darby, “Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding surgical techniques,” The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, vol. 24, pp. 272–278, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  13. R. Crespi, P. Cappare, E. Gherlone, and G. E. Romanos, “Immediate occlusal loading of implants placed in fresh sockets after tooth extraction,” The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, vol. 22, pp. 955–962, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  14. U. C. Belser, L. Grutter, F. Vailati, M. M. Bornstein, H. P. Weber, and D. Buser, “Outcome evaluation of early placed maxillary anterior single tooth implants using objective esthetic criteria: a cross-sectional, retrospective study in 45 patients with a 2- to 4-year follow-up using pink and white esthetics cores,” Journal of Periodontology, vol. 80, pp. 140–151, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  15. W. W. L. Chee, “Treatment planning and soft-tissue management for optimal implant esthetics: a prosthodontic perspective,” Journal of the California Dental Association, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 559–563, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. N. Patel, “Integrating three-dimensional digital technologies for comprehensive implant dentistry,” Journal of the American Dental Association, vol. 141, supplement 2, pp. 20S–24S, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  17. I. Abrahamsson, T. Berglundh, and J. Lindhe, “The mucosal barrier following abutment dis/reconnection. An experimental study in dogs,” Journal of Clinical Periodontology, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 568–572, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  18. R. Scotti, P. Cardelli, P. Baldissara, and C. Monaco, “Clinical fitting of CAD/CAM zirconia single crowns generated from digital intraoral impressions based on active wavefront sampling,” Journal of Dentistry, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. A. Ender and A. Mehl, “Full archscans: conventionalversus digitalimpressions—an in-vitrostudy,” International Journal of Computerized Dentistry, vol. 14, pp. 11–21, 2011. View at Google Scholar