Wharton’s Duct Sialolith of Unusual Size: A Case Report with a Review of the Literature

Table 1

Unusually sized sialoliths reported in literature.

	Study	Number of cases	Age	Gland	Location	Size
1	Meyers, 1942 [17]	1	50	SM	Duct	50
2	Mustard, 1945 [18]	1	42	SM	Duct	56
3	Allen, 1956 [19]	1	49	SM	Duct	35
4	Cavina and Santoli, 1965 [20]	1	59	SM	Duct	70+
5	Cavina and Santoli, 1965 [20]	1	53	SM	Both	60
6	Hoggins, 1968 [21]	1	52	SM	Paren	50
7	Rust and Messerly, 1969 [22]	1	66	P	Duct	51
8	Rust and Messerly, 1969 [22]	1	58	NR	Paren	35
9	Raksin et al., 1975 [23]	1	52	SM	Duct	55
10	Isacsson and Persson, 1982 [24]	1	48	SM	Duct	36
11	Tinsely, 1989 [25]	1	48	SM	Paren	50
12	Hubar et al., 1990 [26]	1	65	SM	Duct	52
13	Akin and Esmer, 1991 [27]	1	45	SM	Paren	45
14	Paul and Chauhan, 1995 [28]	1	45	SM	Duct	46
15	Bodner, 2002 [29]	1	50	SM	Duct	50
16	Ledesma-Montes et al., 2007 [7]	1	34	SM	Duct	36
17	Gonçalves et al., 2002 [30]	1	52	SM	Duct	22
18	Rai and Burman, 2009 [31]	1	60	SM	Duct	72
19	Miyashita et al., 2013 [32]	1	58	P	Duct	15
20	Yu et al., 2013 [5]	9	15–78	SM and P	Duct	16–29
21	Huang et al., 2009 [9]	1	57	SM	Duct	40
22	This case	1	36	SM	Duct	20

SM, submandibular gland; P, parotid gland; Paren, parenchymal; NR, not reported.