Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Case Reports in Dentistry
Volume 2016, Article ID 8597872, 4 pages
Case Report

Concrescence: Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Imaging Perspective

1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, CWRU School of Dental Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
2Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Western Reserve OMS, Middleburg Heights, OH, USA

Received 30 July 2016; Accepted 14 September 2016

Academic Editor: Jiiang H. Jeng

Copyright © 2016 Ali Zakir Syed et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. C. M. Killian and T. P. Croll, “Dental twinning anomalies: the nomenclature enigma,” Quintessence International, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 571–576, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. K. Gunduz, M. Sumer, A. P. Sumer, and O. Gunhan, “Concrescence of a mandibular third molar and a supernumerary fourth molar: report of a rare case,” British Dental Journal, vol. 200, no. 3, pp. 141–142, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. Sugiyama, I. Ogawa, Y. Suei, H. Tohmori, K. Higashikawa, and N. Kamata, “Concrescence of teeth: cemental union between the crown of an impacted tooth and the roots of an erupted tooth,” Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 60–62, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. K. J. Gernhofer, “Concrescence of a maxillary second and third molar,” Journal of the California Dental Association, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 479–481, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. L. Law, G. Fishelberg, J. E. Skribner, and L. M. Lin, “Endodontic treatment of mandibular molars with concrescence,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 562–564, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. B. Mohan, “Hypercementosis and concrescence of maxillary second molar with third molar: a case report and review of literature,” Oral Health and Dental Management, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 558–561, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  7. Y. Arai, E. Tammisalo, K. Iwai, K. Hashimoto, and K. Shinoda, “Development of a compact computed tomographic apparatus for dental use,” Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 245–248, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. P. Mozzo, C. Procacci, A. Tacconi, P. T. Martini, and I. A. C. Andreis, “A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results,” European Radiology, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 1558–1564, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. Z. Syed, C. Sin, R. Rios, and M. Mupparapu, “Incidental occurrence of an unusually large mastoid foramen on cone-beam computed tomography and review of the literature,” Imaging Science in Dentistry, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 39–45, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. A. Roychoudhury, Y. Gupta, and H. Parkash, “Mesiodens: a retrospective study of fifty teeth,” Journal of the Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 144–146, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. Miziara, C. Mendes, C. Wiesel et al., “A statistical study of the association of seven dental anomalies in the Brazilian population,” International Journal of Morphology, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 403–406, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  12. J. S. Khedgikar and S. B. Khedgikar, “Concrescence of a maxillary first and second molar: a case report,” Journal of Medical and Dental Science Research, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–3, 2015. View at Google Scholar