Case Reports in Dermatological Medicine

Case Reports in Dermatological Medicine / 2017 / Article

Case Report | Open Access

Volume 2017 |Article ID 3861972 | 4 pages |

A Tale of Two Cysts: Steatocystoma Multiplex and Eruptive Vellus Hair Cysts—Two Case Reports and a Review of the Literature

Academic Editor: Alireza Firooz
Received07 Jan 2017
Accepted16 Mar 2017
Published05 Apr 2017


Background. Steatocystoma multiplex (SM) and eruptive vellus hair cysts (EVHC) are uncommon benign tumors of the pilosebaceous unit. Both SM and EVHC are characterized by smooth, asymptomatic papules or nodules, most commonly presenting on the chest, limbs, and abdomen. Most cases of SM and EVHC are sporadic, although less common autosomal dominant inherited forms have been reported. Main Observation. In this report we present two cases of cutaneous cysts exhibiting characteristics of either SM or EVHC. Both patients presented with numerous 1-2 mm asymptomatic papules and responded well to surgical expression by incision and drainage (I&D). Conclusion. SM and EVHC are similar in clinical presentation and management. Previously reported “hybrid-type” tumors present strong evidence for a relationship between the two lesions pathologically. Due to potential similarity of EVHC and SM cyst contents, I&D and subsequent microscopic examination cannot definitely differentiate between EVHC, SM, and hybrid cysts.

1. Introduction

Steatocystoma multiplex (SM) and eruptive vellus hair cysts (EVHC) are uncommon benign tumors of the pilosebaceous unit. SM is characterized by multiple smooth asymptomatic papules or nodules, usually presenting on the chest, limbs and axillae, back, or abdomen. Facial involvement is less frequently noted but has been reported [1, 2]. Eruptive vellus hair cysts (EVHC) are a related cutaneous tumor and feature a similar clinical presentation with regard to appearance and spatial distribution, although facial EVHCs are a noted variant [3]. Both SM and EVHC are most likely to emerge during adolescence or early adulthood [1, 3]. Clinical diagnosis of these disorders can be a challenge due to their relative rarity of occurrence. Here we describe two patients with cutaneous cysts exhibiting the features of either SM or EVHC.

2. Case Reports

2.1. Case Report #1

A 15-year-old Caucasian male presented with a six-year history of multiple noninflamed, nonumbilicated papules on his anterior chest and abdomen. The initial eruption in 2009 of white and pink perifollicular 1-2 mm papules was especially numerous (>25) over the sternum, where they developed in a diamond-shaped pattern. No family history of similar dermatological disorders was noted. This eruption was clinically diagnosed as steatocystoma multiplex and showed significant improvement after five years of treatment with a topical 10% glycolic acid lotion. I&D expression of the few remaining lesions resulted in oily, curd-like material containing multiple vellus hairs (Figure 1). While this patient’s lesions were not biopsied, a representative photomicrograph of a steatocystoma is shown in Figure 2. Interestingly, the lesions were preceded by a severe case of molluscum contagiosum that spanned the patient’s chest, abdomen, back, and buttocks and was treated with 5% imiquimod cream. In addition to molluscum contagiosum, the patient’s history was positive for atopic eczema and pityriasis alba on other areas of his body. Concomitant dermatological disorders included acne in the form of open and closed comedones on his face, neck, and chest. The SM lesions were distinct from the acne lesions, the latter of which were erythematous and inflamed.

2.2. Case Report #2

A 67-year-old Caucasian female presented with numerous 1-2 mm white and yellow papules in a bilateral periorbital distribution (Figure 3(a)), which had emerged over the course of 15 years. Favre-Racouchot syndrome was initially suspected due to her age, cyst location, and concomitant solar elastosis. However, the papules that present with Favre-Racouchot syndrome are often yellow or brown in appearance and accompanied by open comedones, in contrast to our patient. Thus, several of these papules were removed and evaluated pathologically, revealing a mixture of milia and small cysts consistent with the diagnosis of eruptive vellus hair cysts; these contained multiple small lumenal degenerating hair shafts. A representative photomicrograph of an EVHC lesion is shown in Figure 4. Several of this patient’s cysts were removed surgically for cosmetic reasons. One year after surgery, no recurrence of the expressed cysts was noted (Figure 3(b)). The patient’s history was significant for milia, actinic keratoses, and discoid lupus erythematosus lesions on the scalp.

3. Discussion

Many similarities exist between SM and EVHC in terms of clinical presentation. Both SM and EVHC are most likely to emerge during adolescence or early adulthood [1, 3]. However, in their review of EVHC cases, Torchia et al. noted the presence of an interesting subgroup of patients that developed EVHC after age 35. Many of the individuals in this subgroup were women who presented with facial cysts rather than more common sites on the trunk and limbs [3], similar to our second patient. Our female patient also exhibited numerous milia, benign keratinous cysts that commonly present periorbitally. However, current literature does not seem to suggest a general correlation between milia and EVHC formation [3].

Most cases of SM and EVHC are sporadic, although familial cases of each have been reported and are transmitted in an autosomal dominant fashion [16]. It is notable that, in our first patient, SM developed shortly after a severe case of molluscum contagiosum and a general history of atopy. As the causes of nonhereditary SM are unknown, it is tempting to speculate that the imiquimod treatment and subsequent robust immune response may have played a role in the development of his cysts.

The true differentiation between SM and EVHC occurs at the histological level. Histological examination of a biopsied SM cyst will reveal thin walls of stratified squamous epithelium without a granular layer, typically with abundant sebaceous input (Figure 2). The cyst is frequently connected to the epidermis by a tissue cord originating from the infundibulum of the pilosebaceous unit [1]. Each steatocystoma is associated with a hair follicle, which can result in retention of trapped vellus hairs in the cystic lumen, as seen in our first patient [1, 2, 7]. Notably, the lesions seen in SM are bona fide tumors, rather than retention cysts caused by blockage of a sebaceous gland [1, 7]. The lining of the cystic cavity typically retains the undulated eosinophilic structure characteristic of the sebaceous duct, from which these hamartomas originate [2].

EVHCs originate from the isthmus or infundibulum of the pilosebaceous unit and thus are often lined by squamous epithelium containing a granular layer, in contrast to SM. These cysts also typically contain laminated keratin and multiple vellus hairs (Figure 4). Due to their different origins in the pilosebaceous unit, SM and EVHC cysts also differ in the classes of keratin found in their walls; while both cysts express keratin 17, only steatocystomas demonstrate expression of keratin 10 [8]. Interestingly, I&D and subsequent microscopic examination of cyst contents have been suggested as a less-invasive alternative to punch biopsy to diagnose EVHC, based on the presence of vellus hairs [911]. We disagree with this assertion, as SM lesions can also exhibit vellus hair inclusion, as shown in Figure 1 and reported in other sources [1, 2, 7]. Thus, histologic examination of the biopsied cyst wall and contents remains the gold standard to definitively differentiate between SM and EVHC. However, given the relative ease of examining cyst contents after I&D and the general rule that EVHC lesions are likely to contain a higher number of vellus hairs than those of SM, this procedure may still be useful in a clinical setting.

Intriguingly, there have been various reports of patients presenting with both SM and EVHC concurrently, or with hybrid cysts that exhibit features of both disorders [2, 6, 1215]. Such reports have prompted speculation that SM and EVHC may be related and on the continuum of one unified disease process [2, 6, 14]. Ohtake et al. were the first to suggest that these hybrid-type tumors may be the result of cystic changes near the junction of the pilosebaceous duct, rather than discrete zones of the hair follicle [15]. Further investigations into the biological mechanisms regulating pilosebaceous tumor development may prove rewarding for our scientific understanding of the relationship between SM and EVHC.

Ultimately, the distinction between SM and EVHC may be primarily an academic one. Both lesions respond to similar treatment modalities and the problems they present are predominantly cosmetic, as they are rarely correlated to any serious genetic syndromes. Noted interventions with a history of efficacy include expression via surgical incision, excision, or needle aspiration; retinoic acid; and Erbium:YAG or CO2 lasers [3, 12, 16]. While there have been some reports of spontaneous resolution of EVHC [3], this appears to be a minority of cases.

4. Conclusion

Our report details two cases of uncommon pilosebaceous tumors, steatocystoma multiplex, and eruptive vellus hair cysts. Despite clear histological differences between these lesions, SM and EVHC are similar in clinical presentation and management. “Hybrid-type” tumors present strong evidence for a relationship between the SM and EVHC pathologically. Due to their relative rarity of occurrence, familiarity with cyst presentation in these lesions will prove useful for accurate clinical diagnosis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.


The authors would like to thank Michael Rabkin, M.D., Ph.D., and Milena Kozovska, M.D., Ph.D. (both of the Rabkin Dermatopathology Laboratory in Tarentum, PA) for the photomicrograph images of representative SM and EVHC histology. The authors also gratefully acknowledge the University of Illinois-Chicago Research Open Access Article Publishing (ROAAP) Fund for financial support in publishing this case report.


  1. G. Plewig, H. H. Wolff, and O. Braun-Falco, “Steatocystoma multiplex: anatomic reevaluation, electron microscopy, and autoradiography,” Archives of Dermatological Research, vol. 272, no. 3-4, pp. 363–380, 1982. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. S. Cho, S.-E. Chang, J.-H. Choi, K.-J. Sung, K.-C. Moon, and J.-K. Koh, “Clinical and histologic features of 64 cases of steatocystoma multiplex,” Journal of Dermatology, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 152–156, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. D. Torchia, J. Vega, and L. A. Schachner, “Eruptive vellus hair cysts: a systematic review,” American Journal of Clinical Dermatology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 19–28, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. H. T. Kamra, P. A. Gadgil, A. G. Ovhal, and R. R. Narkhede, “Steatocystoma multiplex-a rare genetic disorder: a case report and review of the literature,” Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 166–168, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. A. S. Antal, D. Kulichova, S. Redler, R. C. Betz, and T. Ruzicka, “Steatocystoma multiplex: keratin 17—the key player?” British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 167, no. 6, pp. 1395–1397, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. E. Sánchez‐Yus, A. Aguilar‐Martínez, M. C. Cristóbal‐Gil, F. Urbina‐González, and P. Guerra‐Rodríguez, “Eruptive vellus hair cyst and steatocystoma multiplex: two related conditions?” Journal of Cutaneous Pathology, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 40–42, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. A. M. Kligman and J. D. Kirschbaum, “Steatocystoma multiplex: a dermoid tumor,” The Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 42, pp. 383–387, 1964. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. H. Tomková, W. Fujimoto, and J. Arata, “Expression of keratins (K10 and K17) in steatocystoma multiplex, eruptive vellus hair cysts, and epidermoid and trichilemmal cysts,” The American Journal of Dermatopathology, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 250–253, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. S. D. Hong and I. J. Frieden, “Diagnosing eruptive vellus hair cysts,” Pediatric Dermatology, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 258–259, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. T. I. Kaya, C. Tataroglu, U. Tursen, and G. Ikizoglu, “Eruptive vellus hair cysts: an effective extraction technique for treatment and diagnosis,” Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 264–268, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. A. Karadag, E. Cakir, and A. Pelitli, “Eruptive vellus hair cysts: an alternative diagnosing method,” Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, vol. 75, no. 5, pp. 537–538, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. E. Papakonstantinou, I. Franke, and H. Gollnick, “Facial steatocystoma multiplex combined with eruptive vellus hair cysts: a hybrid?” Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 2051–2053, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. A. Yamada, K. Saga, and K. Jimbow, “Acquired multiple pilosebaceous cysts on the face having the histopathological features of steatocystoma multiplex and eruptive vellus hair cysts,” International Journal of Dermatology, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 861–863, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. P. Kiene, A. Hauschild, and E. Christophers, “Eruptive vellus hair cysts and steatocystoma multiplex. Variants of one entity?” British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 134, no. 2, pp. 365–367, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. N. Ohtake, Y. Kubota, O. Takayama, S. Shimada, and K. Tamaki, “Relationship between steatocystoma multiplex and eruptive vellus hair cysts,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 876–878, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. W. Bakkour and V. Madan, “Carbon dioxide laser perforation and extirpation of steatocystoma multiplex,” Dermatologic Surgery, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 658–662, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2017 Rachel J. Waldemer-Streyer and Ellen Jacobsen. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

7494 Views | 422 Downloads | 0 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.