Case Reports in Emergency Medicine

Case Reports in Emergency Medicine / 2013 / Article

Case Report | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 295261 |

Byron Bassi, L. Connor Nickels, F. Eike Flach, Guiliano DePortu, Latha Ganti, "Acute on Chronic Venous Thromboembolism on Therapeutic Anticoagulation", Case Reports in Emergency Medicine, vol. 2013, Article ID 295261, 3 pages, 2013.

Acute on Chronic Venous Thromboembolism on Therapeutic Anticoagulation

Academic Editor: O. Kose
Received09 Jul 2013
Accepted06 Sep 2013
Published08 Oct 2013


A case of proximal venous thromboembolism in a patient who presented to the ED with lower extremity pain is presented. Making this diagnosis is very important as fifty percent of patients with symptomatic proximal DVTs will go on to develop PE without treatment. This report underscores the utility of bedside ultrasonography in the emergency department.

1. Introduction

Venous thromboembolic disease is fairly common, with an approximate yearly incidence exceeding one in every 1000 adults [1], and two-thirds of these will present as isolated deep vein thrombosis (DVT) [2]. While more of these patients will have distal rather than proximal DVT, the mortality rate of proximal DVT is almost double that of distal DVT due to its propensity to migrate to the lungs and cause acute pulmonary embolus (PE) [3]. Multiple characteristics have been looked at in an attempt to differentiate acute from chronic DVT, as these are treated very differently. It can be difficult to differentiate acute from chronic DVT with ultrasound alone [4]. However, lumen echogenicity and vessel elasticity are two characteristics that have shown promise in aiding with this difficult diagnosis [5, 6], as chronic thrombi are more echogenic and less elastic than acute thrombi [7, 8].

2. Case

A 40-year-old male presented to the emergency department with the complaint of left lower extremity pain and swelling for three weeks which had acutely worsened. His past medical history was significant for PE and DVT, most recently five months prior to presentation. He was on daily Coumadin but had difficulty consistently maintaining a therapeutic INR. His most recent INR was 3.9 three days prior to admission. He had been instructed by his primary care physician to hold Coumadin for two days and then restart, which he did the day prior to presentation. Physical exam revealed a warm, erythematous left lower extremity. He was tender to palpation of the calf and had 2+ pitting edema distally from his knee. Distal pulses of his left leg were intact, and he had full strength and range of motion of the knee and ankle.

A high frequency 7.5–10 MHz linear array transducer was used to perform the lower extremity ultrasound. Standard, water-soluble ultrasound gel was applied to the patient’s groin. The femoral region was scanned in the transverse plane, proximally from the level of the common femoral vein (CFV) just proximal to the junction of the long saphenous vein, distally through the division of the superficial and deep femoral veins. The vein was compressed every 2-3 cm in the usual fashion. The ultrasound demonstrated full compressibility of the proximal segment of the common femoral vein, with loss of coaptation distally from the division of the superficial and deep femoral arteries. Additionally, echogenic material was seen within the vessel lumen in the distal portion of the superficial femoral vein and was not seen more proximally though the vessel did not completely collapse. The patient’s INR was found to be subtherapeutic at 1.5. Ultrasound examination of the right lower extremity demonstrated full compressibility of the veins. Given the acute exacerbation of the patient’s symptoms and the lack of echogenic material within the proximal vessel lumen, he was started on heparin infusion for treatment of presumed acute-on-chronic DVT. The patient was admitted to medicine, and a full venous duplex bilateral lower extremity ultrasound was performed by radiology, demonstrating occlusion of the left superficial femoral vein extending through the popliteal vein with partial thrombosis within the common femoral vein. He was transitioned from heparin to Lovenox as a bridge for his subtherapeutic INR and subsequently discharged home after an uncomplicated hospital stay.

3. Discussion

Proximal DVT is a potentially devastating disease. Accurate and early diagnosis is vitally important as fifty percent of patients with symptomatic proximal DVTs will go on to develop PE without treatment [9]. Even with a high level of clinical suspicion, a definitive diagnostic test is required since most classical signs and symptoms of the disease are poorly predictive of the diagnosis [10], and treatment itself carries a number of complications [11].

Ultrasound was first used to diagnose DVT over thirty years ago, [12] and while contrast venography remains the gold standard for diagnosis of DVT, compression ultrasonography has nearly equivalent diagnostic accuracy and has become the diagnostic test of choice [13]. As bedside ultrasound became more and more common, emergency physicians began using two-point compression ultrasonography as a fast and accurate method of diagnosing DVT [14]. Moreover, sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 99%, respectively, can be achieved with as little as ten minutes of training [15].

However, compression ultrasonography is not without limitations and has been shown to be less reliable in patients with recurrent DVT because as many as 50% of scans can still be abnormal one year after the initial DVT [16]. It has been shown in this patient population that noncompressibility of previously normal veins or an increase in abnormal vein diameter can be used to diagnose recurrent DVT [17]. Neither of these methods have been looked at for use by emergency physicians. Additionally, acquiring old ultrasound images can be time consuming or simply not feasible. In the case of our patient, no previous ultrasound studies were available for comparison.

It has been shown that thrombus echogenicity can be used to differentiate acute and chronic thrombi [5] and that vessel elasticity is at least as accurate at discriminating acute and chronic thrombi[6]. However, both of these methods require postscan data analyses and complex mathematical calculations that currently cannot be done at the bedside. Knowing the characteristics that can differentiate acute from chronic thrombi, we made an educated assumption about our patient. The lumen of the common femoral vein appeared to be the same echogenicity of the superficial and deep femoral arteries adjacent to it (Figure 1) while more distally the vein was clearly more echogenic (Figure 2). Additionally, the proximal portion of vein deformed much more than the more distal segment. While we had no formal calculations of echogenicity or elasticity and no prior study to compare with, we expected that if the entire thrombus was the same age it would remodel at a similar rate throughout and therefore show similar echogenicity and elasticity proximally as well as distally. Based on this, we felt confident diagnosing an acute-on-chronic DVT. Further investigation is needed to determine whether an “eye test” that combines the multiple characteristics differentiating acute and chronic DVTs can accurately diagnose DVT in this patient population or whether the postimaging analyses discussed above can be done in real time while scanning. If so, emergency physicians will have yet another powerful tool at their disposal when using bedside ultrasound.


  1. J. A. Heit, M. D. Silverstein, D. N. Mohr et al., “The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism in the community,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 452–463, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  2. R. H. White, “The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism,” Circulation, vol. 107, no. 23, pp. I4–I8, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. J.-P. Galanaud, M.-A. Sevestre-Pietri, J.-L. Bosson et al., “Comparative study on risk factors and early outcome of symptomatic distal versus proximal deep vein thrombosis: results from the OPTIMEV study,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 493–500, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. S. Y. Emelianov, X. Chen, M. O'Donnell et al., “Triplex ultrasound: elasticity imaging to age deep venous thrombosis,” Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 757–767, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. J. B. Fowlkes, R. M. Strieter, L. J. Downing et al., “Ultrasound echogenicity in experimental venous thrombosis,” Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 1175–1182, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. J. M. Rubin, H. Xie, K. Kim et al., “Sonographic elasticity imaging of acute and chronic deep venous thrombosis in humans,” Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 1179–1186, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  7. J. C. U. Coelho, B. Sigel, J. C. Ryva, J. Machi, and S. A. Renigers, “B-mode sonography of blood clots,” Journal of Clinical Ultrasound, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 323–327, 1982. View at: Google Scholar
  8. B. N. Raghavendra, S. C. Horii, S. Hilton, B. R. Subramanyam, R. J. Rosen, and S. Lam, “Deep venous thrombosis: detection by probe compression of veins,” Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 89–95, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  9. S. A. Landaw and K. A. Bauer, “Approach to the diagnosis and therapy of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis,” Up-to-date, May 2012, View at: Google Scholar
  10. S. Goodacre, A. J. Sutton, and F. C. Sampson, “Meta-analysis: the value of clinical assessment in the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 143, no. 2, pp. 129–139, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  11. D. Srinivasan and B. Watzak, “Anticoagulant use in real time,” Journal of Pharmacy Practice, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 270–279, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. J. J. Cronan, “History of venous ultrasound,” Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 1143–1146, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  13. B. J. Grant, “Diagnosis of suspected deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremity,” Up-to-date, October 2012, View at: Google Scholar
  14. M. Blaivas, M. J. Lambert, R. A. Harwood, J. P. Wood, and J. Konicki, “Lower-extremity Doppler for deep venous thrombosis—can emergency physicians be accurate and fast?” Academic Emergency Medicine, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 120–126, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  15. J. G. Crisp, L. M. Lovato, and T. B. Jang, “Compression ultrasonography of the lower extremity with portable vascular ultrasonography can accurately detect deep venous thrombosis in the emergency department,” Annals of Emergency Medicine, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 601–610, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. C. Kearon, J. S. Ginsberg, and J. Hirsh, “The role of venous ultrasonography in the diagnosis of suspected deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 129, no. 12, pp. 1044–1049, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  17. P. Prandoni, A. Cogo, E. Bernardi et al., “A simple ultrasound approach for detection of recurrent proximal-vein thrombosis,” Circulation, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 1730–1735, 1993. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 Byron Bassi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.