Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Case Reports in Genetics
Volume 2016, Article ID 4645716, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4645716
Case Report

Ring Chromosome 4 in a Child with Multiple Congenital Abnormalities: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

1Human Genetics Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, 00800 Colombo, Sri Lanka
2Castle Street Hospital for Women, 00800 Colombo, Sri Lanka

Received 2 May 2016; Accepted 20 July 2016

Academic Editor: Mohnish Suri

Copyright © 2016 C. S. Paththinige et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

A female child born preterm with intrauterine growth retardation and presenting with facial dysmorphism with clefts, microcephaly, limb deformities, and congenital abnormalities involving cardiovascular and urinary systems is described. Chromosomal analysis showed a de novo 46,XX,r(4)(p15.3q35) karyotype. The clinical features of the patient were compared with the phenotypic characteristics of 17 previously reported cases with ring chromosome 4 and those with Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome (4p-). Clinical features observed in this case are consistent with the consensus phenotype in ring chromosome 4. Patent ductus arteriosus and bilateral talipes equinovarus observed in this baby widen the phenotypic spectrum associated with ring chromosome 4.

1. Introduction

Ring chromosome is a rare form of structural chromosomal abnormality which commonly results from the breakage of an end segment of both the short and long arms of the chromosome and subsequent end joining. The site of breakage and the amount of chromosomal material lost vary from case to case even when a single chromosome is considered. The cytogenetic variation in the presence of a ring chromosome depends on the ring size, rate of sister chromatid exchange events, and the viability of altered cell lines [1, 2]. Phenotypic variation of these individuals depends on the size of the ring chromosome, amount of genetic material lost in breakage, the stability of the ring chromosome, and the presence of secondary chromosomal aberrations including the varying degrees of mosaicism [1]. Subtelomeric or telomere-to-telomere fusion of the chromosomes resulting in formation of complete rings was also reported, usually with milder phenotypic changes due to the minimal loss of genetic material [35]. Advances in the cytogenetic techniques, such as high resolution molecular karyotyping, have allowed the detection of novel mechanisms of ring formation, for example, in patients with inverted duplication and terminal deletion, where ring formation was observed as an escape mechanism [6].

Ring chromosomes account for a very low percentage of structural chromosomal abnormalities [7, 8] and majority of the cases are sporadic arising de novo [9]. Ring formation is reported in all human chromosomes with nearly 50% of rings arising from acrocentric chromosomes. Among the nonacrocentric human autosomes, ring chromosome 4 was observed to be a relatively commoner occurrence [8], but only about 20 cases have so far been reported in detail.

The first report of ring chromosome 4 was in 1969, in a newborn baby with growth retardation and multiple congenital abnormalities affecting many systems resulting in early neonatal death [10]. The most recent review of sixteen cases with ring chromosome 4, in 2006, highlighted low birth weight, growth retardation with retarded bone age, microcephaly, and mental retardation as the main clinical features observed in majority of cases. Cleft lip and cleft palate, abnormal facial features, and skeletal abnormalities of the hands and feet were also observed commonly while involvement of one or more of the cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and genitourinary systems was observed in some cases [11]. It is suggested that the phenotype observed in ring chromosome 4 is a combination of clinical features due to terminal deletions of the chromosome and unspecified developmental abnormalities due to chromosomal instability in ring formation [12].

We report a baby girl who was referred for genetic evaluation due to intrauterine growth retardation and multiple congenital abnormalities and was found to have a de novo 46,XX,r(4)(p15.3q35) karyotype. Herein, her clinical findings are compared with those of the previously reported cases of ring chromosome 4.

2. Case Description

Clinical information and peripheral blood samples were collected from the proband and his parents after obtaining their written informed consent. Parental written informed consent was also obtained for publication.

The proband was the first child of a nonconsanguineous couple with an unremarkable family history. At the time of conception, the father was 39 years old while the mother was 33 years old. Routine prenatal scans indicated intrauterine growth retardation. The baby was delivered at 35 weeks’ gestation. She was resuscitated at birth and Apgar scores were 4, 6, and 6 at 1 minute, 5 minutes, and 10 minutes, respectively. Her birth weight (1.5 kg) and head circumference (25.5 cm) were below the 3rd centile expected for a baby born at 35 weeks of gestation and the crown-to-heel length (48 cm) was above the 50th centile. The baby had microcephaly, right side ptosis, low set ears, unilateral cleft lip and cleft palate, short neck, and bilateral talipes equinovarus. A murmur was elicited during the cardiovascular examination. Examination of other systems showed no abnormality.

Ductus arteriosus was found to be patent in echocardiography performed at 3 weeks and 9 weeks after birth. Abdominal ultrasonography revealed renal agenesis in the right side. No abnormalities were detected in the ultrasound scan of the brain. Radiological assessment of the chest and spine was normal.

Chromosomal analysis of the proband’s peripheral blood using the GTL banding technique at 525-band resolution showed ring chromosome 4 in all 20 spreads analyzed (Figure 1). The karyotype was 46,XX,r(4)(p15.3q35). Chromosomal analysis of both the mother and father was normal.

Figure 1: Karyogram of the baby showing ring chromosome 4.

The baby died of respiratory distress resulting from cardiac failure and renal impairment at 10 weeks after birth. Autopsy was not done.

3. Discussion

Since the first report in 1969, over 20 cases have so far been reported describing the phenotypic spectrum associated with ring chromosome 4. The clinical signs of the present case in comparison with the phenotypic findings of 17 previously reported cases [3, 4, 1024] are summarized in Table 1. Almost all the patients reported had both prenatal and postnatal growth retardation and microcephaly. In addition, most of them also had developmental delay and mental retardation. Abnormal facial features, which were commonly observed in these patients, included hypertelorism, epicanthal folds, micrognathia, and abnormalities of the nose and ears. Five of the 16 reported patients had cleft lip and/or cleft palate. Skeletal abnormalities were also a common finding among these patients. These abnormalities commonly involved the thumb, fifth finger, and feet. Abnormalities of feet reported among these patients include overlapping toes, hypoplasia of toes, valgus deformity, and rocker-bottom feet. In addition to these phenotypic features observed in ring chromosome 4, this baby had bilateral talipes equinovarus. Abnormalities of the heart, gastrointestinal system, kidneys, and urinary system were observed in nearly one-third of the reported patients. As reported in 4 patients, these systemic abnormalities tended to occur together [10, 11, 19, 23]. Cardiac abnormalities observed in patients with ring chromosome 4 typically involve cardiac septation and include atrial septal defects, patent foramen ovale, ventricular septal defects, and transposition of great arteries. Patent ductus arteriosus observed in this baby is not reported earlier in association with ring chromosome 4. Unilateral renal agenesis observed in this baby is also reported in one case previously, while renal hypoplasia is observed in 3 other patients. These clinical features observed in this baby are consistent with the consensus phenotype of ring chromosome 4; furthermore bilateral talipes equinovarus and patent ductus arteriosus add to the phenotypic spectrum observed in ring chromosome 4.

Table 1: Karyotype and the clinical features of the present case and previously reported cases with ring chromosome 4.

In the reported cases of ring chromosome 4, chromosomal breakpoints were common at p16 and q35. Telomere-to-telomere fusion was suggested as the mechanism of ring formation in 2 cases, and both these cases did not show any systemic involvement [3, 4]. Mosaic genotype with ring chromosome 4 was also reported in 2 cases. One case with 46X,r(4)/46,XY mosaicism had significant renal involvement [20], while the other one had 45,XX,-4/46,XX,r(4) mosaicism which was detected prenatally and the pregnancy was terminated at 17 weeks’ gestation. Abnormalities of the cardiovascular and gastrointestinal systems were identified in the fetus [23].

It is postulated that the clinical features observed in patients with ring chromosome 4 are partly due to the terminal deletion of the chromosome’s p and q arms. Patients with terminal deletions of the p arm were reported to have growth failure, developmental delay, congenital cardiac defects, finger and toe anomalies, and speech delay [26]. The genes deleted in this critical region in chromosome 4 in those patients included HAND2 gene, which is expressed in the ventricular chambers of the developing heart, and SORBS2 gene, which is expressed in epithelial tissue and cardiac muscle. These genes may potentially contribute to the cardiac defects in terminal 4q deletion, hence in ring chromosome 4.

Terminal deletion of the short (p) arm of chromosome 4 is a well-known clinical entity which is described as Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome (WHS) (MIM 194190). Terminal 4p16.3 deletion is known to be necessary and sufficient to produce the classical phenotype of WHS [25]. A recent review of reported cases of WHS suggested that the characteristic facies, mental retardation, prenatal and postnatal growth retardation, microcephaly, seizures, and hypotonia were present in nearly all the reported cases irrespective of the size of the deleted chromosomal segment. Congenital heart defects, cleft palate and cleft lip, colobomas, hypospadias, and renal and skeletal abnormalities are the other commonly observed abnormalities in WHS [25]. The breakpoint on the short arm is reported to be located in the region 4p16.1 [23]. This leads to deletion of the distal portion of the short arm that includes the WHS critical region (WHSCR). Genotype-phenotype analysis of WHS has reported that haploinsufficiency of WHSC1 gene causes the characteristic facial dysmorphism and growth delay in WHS. Microcephaly is mapped to an area with its distal boundary at 2.2 Mb from the telomere, whereas the chromosomal localization of cardiac, renal, and genital anomalies is known to be further distal to the telomere [25]. This explains the more severe phenotype with systemic involvement in larger terminal deletion in WHS as well as in ring chromosome 4. The breakpoint in p arm of chromosome 4 is located proximally to MSX1 gene which is known to be associated with cleft lip and cleft palate [27].

Phenotypic features observed in the present case are comparable to the phenotype of the previously reported cases with r(4)(p16q35) karyotype and some of the phenotypic features observed in 4q terminal deletion and WHS. This suggests that the phenotypic features of ring chromosome 4 are the cumulative effect of the deletion of a number of genes located in the terminal 4p and 4q regions. Chromosomal instability in ring formation is also likely to have an additional influence on the phenotype in ring chromosome 4.

In the literature cited in this paper, 5 of the 17 reviewed reports on ring chromosome 4 have presented their case as WHS [11, 12, 15, 16, 24]. Table 2 shows the clinical features of WHS which were found in common in the present case and in previously reported cases of ring chromosome 4. Although dysmorphic facial features were observed in majority of the cases, the characteristic “Greek warrior helmet” profile with prominent glabella was observed in only two cases [11, 23]. Even though seizures and hypotonia are described as customary features of WHS, seizures were reported in only two cases [11, 13] and hypotonia was reported in another two cases with ring chromosome 4 [15, 16]. These findings suggest that the phenotypic spectrum of patients with ring chromosome 4 does not always conform to the consensus phenotype of WHS.

Table 2: The comparison of clinical features of Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome which were found in common in the present case and in previously reported cases of ring chromosome 4.

In conclusion, the phenotypic features observed in this baby add to the spectrum of clinical features observed in ring chromosome 4. Conventional karyotyping was used for cytogenetic diagnosis of the present case; however, the exact chromosomal breakpoints can only be confirmed by the use of molecular cytogenetic methods such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and microarray, which have not yet been fully established at our centre. Such techniques will allow the precise identification of the deleted chromosomal segments and the genes involved, which will help to improve the understanding of the phenotype-genotype correlation of this relatively rare structural chromosomal abnormality.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. G. Kosztolányi, “The genetics and clinical characteristics of constitutional ring chromosomes,” Journal of the Association of Genetic Technologists, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 44–48, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  2. C. P. Sodré, R. S. Guilherme, V. F. A. Meloni et al., “Ring chromosome instability evaluation in six patients with autosomal rings,” Genetics and Molecular Research, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 134–143, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. McDermott, M. A. Voyce, and D. Romain, “Ring chromosome 4,” Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 228–232, 1977. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. G. Freyberger, C. Wamsler, and M. Schmid, “Ring chromosome 4 in a child with mild dysmorphic signs,” Clinical Genetics, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 151–155, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. R. Vermeesch, E. Baten, J.-P. Fryns, and K. Devriendt, “Ring syndrome caused by ring chromosome 7 without loss of subtelomeric sequences,” Clinical Genetics, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 415–417, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. Knijnenburg, A. van Haeringen, K. B. M. Hansson et al., “Ring chromosome formation as a novel escape mechanism in patients with inverted duplication and terminal deletion,” European Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 548–555, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. Nielsen and M. Wohlert, “Chromosome abnormalities found among 34910 newborn children: results from a 13-year incidence study in Århus, Denmark,” Human Genetics, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 81–83, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. H.-J. Kim, S.-C. Jung, H.-R. Moon, S.-S. Kim, and J.-S. Lee, “Chromosome abnormalities in a referred population for suspected chromosomal aberrations: a report of 4117 cases,” Journal of Korean Medical Science, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 373–376, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. G. Kosztolányi, K. Méhes, and E. B. Hook, “Inherited ring chromosomes: an analysis of published cases,” Human Genetics, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 320–324, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. R. Carter, E. Baker, and D. Hayman, “Congenital malformations associated with a ring 4 chromosome,” Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 224–227, 1969. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. Balci, Ö. Engiz, D. Aktaş et al., “Ring chromosome 4 and Wolf-Hirschhorn Syndrome (WHS) in a child with multiple anomalies,” American Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 140, no. 6, pp. 628–632, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. G. Kosztolányi, “Ring chromosome 4: Wolf syndrome and unspecific developmental anomalies,” Acta Paediatrica Hungarica, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 157–165, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. Bobrow, L. F. Joness, and G. Clarke, “A complex chromosomal rearrangement with formation of a ring 4,” Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 235–239, 1971. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. R. Niss and E. Passarge, “Derivative chromosomal structures from a ring chromosome 4,” Humangenetik, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 9–23, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. Pérez-Castillo and J. A. Abrisqueta, “Ring chromosome 4 and wolf syndrome,” Human Genetics, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 87–91, 1977. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J. del Mazo, J. A. Abrisqueta, A. Pérez-Castillo et al., “Partial deletion of 4p16 band in a ring chromosome and Wolf syndrome,” Human Genetics, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 105–108, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. W. H. Finley, S. C. Finley, T. Chonmaitree, J. E. Koors, and W. C. Chandler, “Ring 4 chromosome with terminal p and q deletions,” The American Journal of Diseases of Children, vol. 135, no. 8, pp. 729–731, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. Gutkowska, M. Krajewska-Walasek, and L. Wisniewski, “Ring chromosome 4: 46,XY, r (4) (p16q35) in a boy,” Klinische Padiatrie, vol. 197, no. 4, pp. 294–296, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. F. Halal and M. Vekemans, “Ring chromosome 4 in a child with duodenal atresia,” American Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 79–82, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. C. E. Anderson, R. Wallerstein, S. T. Zamerowski et al., “Ring chromosome 4 mosaicism coincidence of oligomeganephronia and signs of Seckel syndrome,” American Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 281–285, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. G. Calabrese, A. Giannotti, R. Mingarelli, M. C. Di Gilio, M. R. Piemontese, and G. Palka, “Two newborns with chromosome 4 imbalances: Deletion 4q33 q35 and ring r(4)(pterq35.2-qter),” Clinical Genetics, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 264–267, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. S. Sigurdardottir, B. K. Goodman, J. Rutberg, G. H. Thomas, E. W. Jabs, and M. T. Geraghty, “Clinical, cytogenetic, and fluorescence in situ hybridization findings in two cases of 'complete ring' syndrome,” American Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 87, no. 5, pp. 384–390, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. A. Kocks, S. Endele, R. Heller et al., “Partial deletion of 4p and 4q in a fetus with ring chromosome 4: phenotype and molecular mapping of the breakpoints,” Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 1–4, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. D. Concolino, E. Rossi, P. Strisciuglio et al., “Deletion of a 760 kb region at 4p16 determines the prenatal and postnatal growth retardation characteristic of Wolf-Hirschhorn syndrome,” Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 647–650, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. Zollino, M. Murdolo, G. Marangi et al., “On the nosology and pathogenesis of Wolf–Hirschhorn syndrome: genotype–phenotype correlation analysis of 80 patients and literature review,” American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics, vol. 148, no. 4, pp. 257–269, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. E.-M. Strehle, L. Yu, J. A. Rosenfeld et al., “Genotype-phenotype analysis of 4q deletion syndrome: proposal of a critical region,” American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, vol. 158, no. 9, pp. 2139–2151, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. M. J. Dixon, M. L. Marazita, T. H. Beaty, and J. C. Murray, “Cleft lip and palate: understanding genetic and environmental influences,” Nature Reviews Genetics, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 167–178, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus