Case Reports in Genetics

Case Reports in Genetics / 2016 / Article

Case Report | Open Access

Volume 2016 |Article ID 9280812 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9280812

Abhisek Swaika, Nicole J. Boczek, Neha Sood, Kimberly Guthrie, Eric W. Klee, Ankit Agrawal, Elliot L. Dimberg, Sikander Ailawadhi, "Whole Exome Sequencing Leading to the Diagnosis of Dysferlinopathy with a Novel Missense Mutation (c.959G>C)", Case Reports in Genetics, vol. 2016, Article ID 9280812, 4 pages, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9280812

Whole Exome Sequencing Leading to the Diagnosis of Dysferlinopathy with a Novel Missense Mutation (c.959G>C)

Academic Editor: Balraj Mittal
Received19 Jan 2016
Revised27 Mar 2016
Accepted04 Apr 2016
Published19 Apr 2016

Abstract

Dysferlinopathy is an uncommon, progressive muscular dystrophy that has a wide phenotypic variability and primarily supportive management (Nguyen et al., 2007; Narayanaswami et al., 2014). Amyloid myopathy is a distinct, rare disorder that can present similarly to inflammatory myopathies and requires a high clinical suspicion for early intervention to prolong survival. Amyloid myopathy is typically associated with other systemic manifestations of amyloidosis, but rare cases of isolated amyloid myopathy have been described (Mandl et al., 2000; Hull et al., 2001). Positive Congo red stains on tissue biopsy remain the gold standard for diagnosis (Spuler et al., 1998; Karacostas et al., 2005). A high clinical suspicion and meticulous diagnostic workup that includes novel techniques are necessary for identifying these rare disorders. We report a middle-aged man with progressive leg muscle weakness who was initially treated as having amyloid myopathy but was later diagnosed as having dysferlinopathy by Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) analysis. We also report a novel missense mutation (c.959G>C) to help correlate in any patient with presumed dysferlinopathy and to add to the already known genotype of this disorder.

1. Clinical Report

A 43-year-old Caucasian man with progressive proximal bilateral leg muscle weakness (over the span of 1 year) and increased creatine kinase (1537 u/L) and aldolase levels (23.7 u/L) was treated with etanercept and methotrexate for presumed inflammatory myopathy under the care of a rheumatologist. He had a 20-year history of stable right calf atrophy, which he had attributed to a prior football injury, but he reported no other neuromuscular symptoms. He also did not report any other constitutional symptoms. A neurological consult and evaluation that included electromyography and nerve conduction testing revealed nonspecific myopathy. After six months of treatment without significant improvement, he underwent a vastus lateralis muscle biopsy that revealed perivascular and endomysial congophilic deposits (Figure 1). A repeat biopsy confirmed these findings, but there were no associated dystrophic changes, which led to the diagnosis of amyloid myopathy. He was referred to our institution where an extensive evaluation for systemic amyloidosis, including bone marrow biopsy, biochemical testing, and imaging, was negative. Fat aspirate and rectal biopsy were also inconclusive. Familial history was noncontributory for any similarly affected individuals. Mutations for transthyretin and fibrinogen-alpha-gene- (FGA-) related familial visceral amyloidosis were negative. Repeat electromyography and nerve conduction testing again revealed nonspecific myopathy. The muscle biopsy slides were reexamined with no additional findings. Considering the worsening of his weakness as well as new progressive involvement of bilateral proximal arm muscles, treatment was initiated with chemotherapy, including cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (CyBorD) based on a diagnosis of isolated amyloid myopathy [1]. He tolerated the treatment well but did not have any clinical improvement after three completed cycles; the diagnosis was again questioned. Following a medical genetics consult, Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) was performed for the patient using a commercially available test. The test reports that 90% of bases are expected to have a quality score of Q20 or higher, and their exome analysis augments coverage in over 7,500 additional genes currently associated with human disease. In addition, all reported genes in the Personalis WES report are covered >99.9% with a depth of at least 20x.

Overall, four variants passed all of the test filtering steps, HINT1: c.329_330dupAC ; PGAM2: c.119G>A p.R40Q; DYSF: c.959G>C p.W320S; and c.4794G>T p.K1598N (Figure 2 and Table 1). HINT1 mutations are associated with neuromyotonia and axonal neuropathy, and mutations in PGAM2 are associated with glycogen storage disease X. These disorders are autosomal recessive, and because only one variant was identified, these variants were not likely associated with the phenotype or consistent with the clinical presentation of the patient. Two variants of uncertain significance were identified in the DYSF gene encoding dysferlin (Figure 2 and Table 1). Sanger sequencing of the paternal sample established that only the c.959G>C variant was of paternal origin, while c.4794G.T was not present in the father’s sample. Testing from his unaffected mother was not possible due to logistic reasons, and he had no other siblings. Therefore, it was possible that the two DYSF variants were in trans, one inherited from each parent, or the second DYSF variant, c.4794G>T, was de novo, in which the variants could be in cis or trans. DYSF is known to be associated with Miyoshi myopathy, limb-girdle muscular dystrophy 2B (LGMD2B), and distal myopathy with anterior tibial onset, all of which are autosomal recessive conditions. The c.959G>C variant is novel, whereas c.4794G>T has been previously described in an individual with limb-girdle muscular dystrophy (LGMD) type 2B in the Leiden Muscular Dystrophy (DYSF) pages (http://www.dmd.nl/nmdb/home.php?select_db=DYSF). This led to further immunohistochemical testing on the previously obtained muscle biopsy specimen from our patient that demonstrated an absence of dysferlin staining, thus establishing the diagnosis of dysferlinopathy (LGMD2B).


DYSFc.959G>C p.W320S, paternalc.4794G>T p.K1598N

InterpretationVUSVUS

ESP & ExAC ESP: NR; ExAC: NR ESP: 2/8598; ExAC: 4/121348

SIFT/PolyPhen/MutationTaster Damaging/probably damaging/disease causingTolerated/probably damaging/disease causing

Location (gene; protein)Exon 11; ferlin family domainExon 43; C2 domain F

Previously reported variants in affected individualsThis variant has never been reported; however, there is a previously reported variant in an affected individual in close proximity: p.L322PThis variant has been reported in one affected individual and there are two variants in affected individuals in close proximity: c.4794+1G>A and p.Gly1547_Lys1598del

Diseases associated with DYSF variants Autosomal recessive Miyoshi muscular dystrophy 1, autosomal recessive limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2B, autosomal recessive distal myopathy with anterior tibial onset

VUS: variant of uncertain significance; ESP: National Heart Lung and Blood Institute Exome Sequencing Project; ExAC: Exome Aggregation Consortium; NR: not reported.

2. Discussion

Dysferlinopathies have wide phenotypic variability, even within families, including limb-girdle muscular dystrophy, Miyoshi myopathy, distal anterior compartment myopathy, pseudometabolic myopathy, and asymptomatic hyperCKemia [2]. Dysferlinopathy is characterized by the loss (or significant reduction to <10% normal levels) of the dysferlin protein (encoded by the DYSF gene) in the skeletal muscle of affected patients and has an autosomal recessive mode of inheritance [3]. The typical age of onset ranges from 15 to 35 years. These patients often have very high serum CK levels (1000–40,000 units/L or more) and early weakness of proximal leg muscles [4]. Arm weakness may occur with progression, but facial and bulbar muscles are generally not affected. Cardiac or pulmonary involvement is also uncommon.

LGMD2B is usually slowly progressive and can cause wheelchair dependence within 10 to 20 years after onset [5]. Prior to onset, the patient is usually normal, and some individuals even excel at athletics. The management of LGMD is supportive; no disease-modifying treatments are available [6].

A high clinical suspicion is necessary to diagnose this rare disease, which often leads to delay in diagnosis. Progressive muscle weakness and muscle atrophy mainly involving the proximal limb muscles, particularly if there is a family history of a similar disorder, should raise the suspicion of a muscular dystrophy. Due to the considerable overlap and heterogeneity among the various subtypes, these patients are best served by a referral to a neuromuscular disorder specialist. Targeted genetic and protein testing should mostly precede muscle biopsies in these disorders [6]. WES has also recently been reported to provide a successful LGMD diagnosis in 45% of 60 families within a difficult-to-diagnose cohort of LGMD patients, and it has expanded the clinical phenotypes associated with known myopathy genes [7].

Amyloid deposits may be seen in the blood vessel walls, perimysial connective tissue, or endomysium surrounding muscle fibers in muscle biopsies of dysferlin-deficient patients [8]. Amyloid is derived from the mutant dysferlin and most likely represents a fragment of the full-length protein that has been degraded and then folded to form a β-pleated sheet with typical green birefringence under polarized light [8].

Isolated presentation of amyloid myopathy is also a very rare entity, but it can be diagnosed as the initial presenting feature of systemic amyloidosis [9, 10]. Gertz and Kyle only reported 12 cases of amyloid myopathy in a large retrospective review of 1596 patients with systemic amyloidosis [11]. The presenting symptoms can be nonspecific, but most reported cases presented with proximal muscle weakness [11, 12]. It can also mimic inflammatory myopathies [13, 14]. Congo red stains on the muscle biopsy after unusual findings on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) scanning could aid in diagnosis [15, 16].

A high clinical suspicion is necessary to diagnose these rare disorders; our case highlights the importance of recognizing clinical clues and integration of available diagnostic tools, including WES, to achieve this goal and prevent any unnecessary harmful interventions. We also report a novel missense mutation (c.959G>C) to help correlate in any patient with presumed dysferlinopathy and to add to the already known genotype of this disorder.

Competing Interests

The authors report no competing interests.

Authors’ Contributions

Abhisek Swaika, Kimberly Guthrie, Elliot L. Dimberg, and Sikander Ailawadhi were involved in data collection. All authors contributed to paper preparation.

References

  1. C. P. Venner, T. Lane, D. Foard et al., “Cyclophosphamide, bortezomib,and dexamethasone therapy in AL amyloidosis is associated with high clonal response rates and prolonged progression-free survival,” Blood, vol. 119, no. 19, pp. 4387–4390, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. K. Nguyen, G. Bassez, M. Krahn et al., “Phenotypic study in 40 patients with dysferlin gene mutations: high frequency of atypical phenotypes,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 64, no. 8, pp. 1176–1182, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. V. Nigro and M. Savarese, “Genetic basis of limb-girdle muscular dystrophies: the 2014 update,” Acta Myologica, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  4. T. Takahashi, M. Aoki, N. Suzuki et al., “Clinical features and a mutation with late onset of limb girdle muscular dystrophy 2B,” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 433–439, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. C. Angelini, E. Peterle, A. Gaiani et al., “Dysferlinopathy course and sportive activity: clues for possible treatment,” Acta Myologica, vol. 30, pp. 127–132, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  6. P. Narayanaswami, M. Weiss, D. Selcen et al., “Evidence-based guideline summary: diagnosis and treatment of limb-girdle and distal dystrophies: report of the guideline development subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the practice issues review panel of the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine,” Neurology, vol. 83, pp. 1453–1463, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  7. R. Ghaoui, S. T. Cooper, M. Lek et al., “Use of whole-exome sequencing for diagnosis of limb-girdle muscular dystrophy: outcomes and lessons learned,” JAMA Neurology, vol. 72, no. 12, pp. 1424–1432, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. S. Spuler, M. Carl, J. Zabojszcza et al., “Dysferlin-deficient muscular dystrophy features amyloidosis,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 323–328, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. S. Spuler, A. Emslie-Smith, and A. G. Engel, “Amyloid myopathy: an underdiagnosed entity,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 719–728, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. D. Karacostas, M. Soumpourou, I. Mavromatis, G. Karkavelas, I. Poulios, and I. Milonas, “Isolated myopathy as the initial manifestation of primary systemic amyloidosis,” Journal of Neurology, vol. 252, no. 7, pp. 853–854, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. M. A. Gertz and R. A. Kyle, “Myopathy in primary systemic amyloidosis,” Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 655–660, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. N. Nadkarni, M. Freimer, and J. R. Mendell, “Amyloidosis causing a progressive myopathy,” Muscle and Nerve, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 1016–1018, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. L. A. Mandl, R. D. Folkerth, M. A. Pick, M. E. Weinblatt, and E. M. Gravallese, “Amyloid myopathy masquerading as polymyositis,” Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 949–952, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  14. K. M. Hull, L. Griffith, R. W. Kuncl, and F. M. Wigley, “A deceptive case of amyloid myopathy: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging features,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 1954–1958, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. L. W. Ostrow, A. M. Corse, B. M. Morrison et al., “Expanding the spectrum of monoclonal light chain deposition disease in muscle,” Muscle and Nerve, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 755–761, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. A. Mekinian, A. Jaccard, M. Soussan et al., “18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with amyloid light-chain amyloidosis: case-series and literature review,” Amyloid, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 94–98, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2016 Abhisek Swaika et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views995
Downloads484
Citations

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.