Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Case Reports in Gastrointestinal Medicine
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 9896856, 4 pages
Case Report

A Rare Encounter with an Expanding Pseudocyst of the Spleen

Department of General Surgery, United Mission Hospital, Tansen, Palpa, Nepal

Correspondence should be addressed to Ashish Lal Shrestha; moc.oohay@ytnurghctub

Received 3 October 2017; Accepted 11 December 2017; Published 25 December 2017

Academic Editor: Olga I. Giouleme

Copyright © 2017 Ashish Lal Shrestha and Pradita Shrestha. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Background. Splenic Pseudocyst (SP) is a diagnostic rarity, with cystic lesions of spleen themselves being uncommon. Establishing a preoperative diagnosis could help in specific management but this is rather challenging. Here we present a common presentation of an uncommon diagnosis. Case Presentation. A 47-year-old lady, previously well, presented to the outpatient clinic with intermittent left hypochondrial pain radiating towards left shoulder for 2 months not associated with fever, jaundice, or weight loss. Abdominal examination revealed nontender hepatosplenomegaly. The initial abdominal ultrasonogram (USG) was suggestive of a hydatid cyst, for which she received a course of antihelminthics. At follow-up, after finding no clinical improvement and radiological worsening, she underwent an exploratory laparotomy. A cyst replacing entire lower pole and a significant portion of splenic hilum was found. Total splenectomy was performed. The specimen was reported to be a SP. Conclusion. SP is a unique entity, usually misdiagnosed as a parasitic lesion and often treated with antihelminthic medicines. The natural course of disease, however, follows a subsequent failure of symptom resolution and radiological worsening that ultimately demands surgical attention. Based on size, location, and intraoperative findings, either total or partial splenectomy is required. The final histopathological report often presents a diagnostic surprise.

1. Introduction

Cysts in the spleen are uncommon, and amongst these one rare kind is SP [1, 2]. Previous blunt abdominal trauma is implicated in at least 75% of cases [1, 3].

We report an interesting case of a rare and expanding SP without history of previous abdominal trauma. The clinical presentations, investigative findings, and management are discussed with relevant literature review.

The rarity of this case lies in the fact that it is often misdiagnosed and wrongly treated and eventually requires surgical exploration [4]. Unless a high degree of clinical suspicion is maintained, it is likely to be missed and may result in complications that may be fatal at times.

The peroperative findings and final histopathological report usually take the surgeon by surprise.

2. Case Presentation

A 47-year-old lady without significant past medical or surgical history presented to the outpatient clinic with intermittent episodes of left hypochondrial pain radiating towards the left shoulder for 2 months. She did not have associated fever, jaundice, or altered bowel habits. Some loss of appetite was noted without loss of weight. She could not recall any abdominal trauma in the recent past. Physical examination was unremarkable except for a nontender hepatosplenomegaly.

Hematological and biochemical tests were normal. Abdominal radiographs were unremarkable. Abdominal USG revealed a complex cystic lesion in the spleen measuring 4 × 8 × 6 cm with poorly defined double wall and multiple internal septations suggesting a likely hydatidosis along with enlarged fatty liver.

She was given a course of antihelminthics, vaccinated against capsulated organisms predicting possibility of a subsequent splenectomy, and asked to return a month later.

At follow-up, her symptoms persisted and repeated abdominal USG showed expanding splenic cyst measuring 9 × 8 × 8 cm. CECT scan of the abdomen showed a nonenhancing cystic lesion arising from lower pole and hilum of spleen measuring 10 × 9 × 9 cm with multiple internal septations and abutting the tail of pancreas as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1: CECT scan of the abdomen showing a nonenhancing cystic lesion arising from lower pole and hilum of spleen measuring 10 × 9 × 9 cm with multiple internal septations and abutting the tail of pancreas.

A list of differentials was considered that included a splenic hydatid cyst, pancreatic tail pseudocyst, and a mesenteric cyst. In view of clinical and radiological worsening, she was taken for an elective exploration through a left subcostal incision.

At laparotomy, a huge splenic cyst was found occupying entire lower pole and significant portion of hilum and measuring 9 × 9 × 8 cm. The aspiration of this revealed a brownish translucent fluid as shown in Figure 2, the routine bacterial culture of which was later reported to be sterile.

Figure 2: The brownish translucent fluid aspirated from the expanding splenic cyst, the routine bacterial culture of which was later reported to be sterile.

The cyst was causing pressure atrophy of the residual splenic parenchyma and also had multiple dense perisplenic and pericystic adhesions. Total splenectomy was done. During intraoperative manipulation, the cyst wall got inadvertently ruptured. The image of splenectomy specimen is shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3: The intraoperative image of the splenic cyst causing pressure atrophy of the residual splenic parenchyma. During intraoperative manipulation, the cyst wall was inadvertently ruptured.

She had an uneventful postoperative recovery and was discharged on the 7th postoperative day. At 2-week and one-year follow-up, she remained symptom-free.

Histopathologically, gross examination confirmed the operative findings and showed a unilocular already cut-open cyst measuring 9 × 5 cm with wall thickness measuring 2–5 mm.

Microscopic section showed a cyst wall that was composed of hyalinized fibrous tissue without epithelial lining. Also noted were plenty of extravasated red blood cells and hemosiderin laden macrophages over the cyst wall. There was no evidence of cellular atypia. The microscopic image of the SP is shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4: Microscopic appearance of the Splenic Pseudocyst (stained with Eosin/Hematoxylin stain) at (a) 10x magnification, (b) 25x magnification, (c) 40x magnification.

The features confirmed a SP.

3. Discussion

Splenic cysts have been a matter of curiosity, with a reported incidence of only around 800 globally [1, 57]. Since their recognition in 1829 by Andral and first splenectomy in 1867 by Pean for this condition, there have been infrequent reports in the literature [8]. The earlier system classified these lesions into type 1 (true cysts with lining epithelium) and type 2 (false cysts without lining epithelium) [912]. A consecutive modification divided these into parasitic and nonparasitic varieties, further categorizing nonparasitic ones into primary (epithelial/true) and secondary (false/pseudo) types [13]. Parasitic ones follow a geographical distribution and account for more than 2/3rds of cases in the endemic areas [8]. Of these, the commonest etiology is Echinococcus granulosus [8]. This holds true even in the clinical context of Nepal [14]. More recently, a pathological classification was suggested dividing nonparasitic cysts into congenital, traumatic, neoplastic, and degenerative types [10, 11].

Of all the cysts, SPs constitute 70–80%, particularly affecting women, children, and young adults [1, 4, 8, 15]. The incidence can be expected to rise further with nonoperative management of blunt abdominal trauma becoming more popular.

In symptomatic 2/3rds, symptoms include left hypochondrial pain radiating to the left shoulder or chest [5, 8, 16]. Other symptoms include early satiety, vomiting, dysphagia, and infrequently ipsilateral atelectasis and lower lobe pneumonia depending upon the location and organ of compression [1, 17]. Symptoms also depend on the size of the SP which forms the basis for operative treatment and predicting complications. While SP larger than 5 cm usually dictates operative management, the risk of complications, like sudden increase in size due to intracystic bleed, secondary infections, and even fatality due to spontaneous intraperitoneal rupture, has been noted in larger SP [1, 5, 18]. SP may sometimes attain great dimensions with those exceeding 15 cm entitled giant pseudocysts [4, 11, 19, 20].

SP may also be incidental sonological finding or detected due to calcification on radiographs [17]. USG, CECT, MRI, and MRA can all help to delineate cystic nature of the lesion [4, 8]. However, the precise preoperative radiological diagnosis remains challenging, although it could be a great aid to efficient and specific management.

Most often, misdiagnosed as parasitic lesions, these cysts are often treated with antihelminthics only to find unsatisfactory response and radiological deterioration at follow-up. Our patient had a similar treatment course.

Etiologically, SP represents a resolved hematoma in the parenchymal or subcapsular location due to a preceeding blunt injury [1, 2, 4]. Suggested alternate etiologies include infections and degenerative diseases [4, 21].

In gross appearance, majority of these are unilocular and smooth walled while microscopic findings consist of fibrous wall tissue without an epithelial lining [4, 5, 7, 8, 19].

Traditional approach to SP larger than 5 cm has been total splenectomy. However, with growing knowledge about protective role of spleen as an organ of reticuloendothelial and hematopoietic importance, more specifically in terms of OPSI, the current approach has been of splenic conservation [4, 7, 22]. In this regard, partial splenectomy, cyst aspiration, deroofing, marsupialisation, decapsulation, and cystectomy have all been described by both open and laparoscopic routes [4, 20, 22, 23]. Laparoscopic unroofing and drainage have been found to have a recurrence rate of 20–40%, and hence to avoid this, marsupialisation or decapsulation has been the recommended technique [18, 24].

Certain characteristics of SP like hilar location, large size with near complete replacement of parenchyma, associated hypersplenism, and doubtful diagnosis are the few important situations where total splenectomy may not be avoidable [7, 22, 25].

In our patient, the likelihood of hydatid etiology was considered earlier in view of endemicity of infestation and hence was managed in similar lines. There was no way to prove or disprove this diagnosis, and the much talked about “Casoni’s intradermal test” was also unavailable in a rural set-up like ours.

At follow-up, since no clinical improvement was found predicting a possibility of life threatening complication like rupture or hemorrhage in future, elective exploration was considered. This was supported with evidence of expanding cyst dimensions and hilar location that made the decision of total splenectomy rather simple. Following this, the patient had an uneventful recovery and remained symptom-free at 1-year follow-up.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, SP is uncommon pathology that is capable of mimicking commoner conditions like hydatidosis. The clinical and radiological pictures may be frequently misleading with consequent mismanagement. A high degree of clinical suspicion is, therefore, as essential as the understanding of potential complications to avoid clinical mishaps.

Definitive diagnosis is possible only on histopathology and usually poses a diagnostic surprise. However, once treated adequately, SP has a good outcome. Hence, awareness of its clinical presentation and good pathological expertise are important adjuncts in the diagnosis.


SP:Splenic Pseudocyst
CECT:Contrast enhanced computed tomography
MRI:Magnetic resonance imaging
MRA:Magnetic resonance arteriogram
OPSI:Overwhelming postsplenectomy infections.


Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and accompanying images.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contributions

Ashish Lal Shrestha participated in the conception and design of the report and wrote the paper, and Pradita Shrestha analyzed the report. Both have been involved in the diagnosis, surgical management, and follow-up of the patient. Both authors read and approved the final paper. Both the authors were involved in planning, analyzing the case, and writing the paper.


The authors would like to thank the ward staff of the hospital for providing support and helping in management of the patient.


  1. G. J. Gibeily and B. L. Eisenberg, “Splenic pseudocysts—diagnosis and management,” Western Journal of Medicine, vol. 148, no. 4, pp. 464–466, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  2. G. Galyfos, Z. Touloumis, K. Palogos et al., “Oversized pseudocysts of the spleen: report of two cases,” International Journal of Surgery Case Reports, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 104–107, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. R. Kostka and Z. Vernerová, “Post-traumatic pseudocyst of the spleen,” Rozhl V Chir Mesicnik Ceskoslovenske Chir Spolecnosti, vol. 89, no. 9, pp. 464–468, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  4. K. Kalinova, “Giant pseudocyst of the spleen: a case report and review of the literature,” Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 176–178, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. Verma, A. Yadav, S. Sharma et al., “A rare splenic pseudocyst,” Journal of Surgical Case Reports, vol. 2013, no. 9, article rjt086, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. F. Roberson, “Solitary cysts of the spleen,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 111, no. 5, pp. 848–850, 1940. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. F. Altintoprak, E. Dikicier, T. Kivilcim, T. Ergonenc, and O. N. Dilek, “An uncommon clinical entity, although common theoretically: pseudocyst of spleen—two case reports and review of the literature,” European Journal of General Medicine, vol. 9, no. 12, Article ID 5000114746, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  8. M. J. Zinner, Maingot’s Abdominal Operations, McGraw-Hill Professional, New York, NY, USA, 11th edition, 2006.
  9. J. W. Martin, “Congenital splenic cysts,” The American Journal of Surgery, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 302–308, 1958. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. B. Ingle, C. R. Hinge, and S. Patrike, “Epithelial cysts of the spleen: a minireview,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 20, no. 38, pp. 13899–13903, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. L. Morgenstern, “Nonparasitic splenic cysts: pathogenesis, classification, and treatment,” Journal of the American College of Surgeons, vol. 194, no. 3, pp. 306–314, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. R. H. Fowler, “Nonparasitic benign cystic tumors of the spleen,” International Abstracts of Surgery, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 209–227, 1953. View at Google Scholar
  13. S. B. Ingle, C. R. Hinge, and S. N. Jatal, “An interesting case of primary epithelial cyst of spleen,” Indian Journal of Pathology and Microbiology, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 181-182, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. B. Devleesschauwer, A. Ale, P. Torgerson et al., “The burden of parasitic zoonoses in nepal: a systematic review,” PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, vol. 8, no. 1, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. P. Mirilas, A. Mentessidou, and J. E. Skandalakis, “Splenic cysts: are there so many types?” Journal of the American College of Surgeons, vol. 204, no. 3, pp. 459–465, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. H. Sarmast, H. I. Showkat, F. Q. Parray, and R. Lone, “Non parasitic splenic cyst: a case report,” Acta Medica Iranica, vol. 50, no. 12, pp. 849–851, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. R. J. Williams and G. Glazer, “Splenic cysts: changes in diagnosis, treatment and aetiological concepts,” Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 87–89, Mar 1993. View at Google Scholar
  18. E. H. Chin, R. Shapiro, D. Hazzan, L. B. Katz, and B. Salky, “A ten-year experience with laparoscopic treatment of splenic cysts,” JSLS: Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons/Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 20–23, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. Cisse, I. Konate, O. Ka, M. Dieng, A. Dia, and C. T. Toure, “Giant splenic pseudocyst, a rare aetiology of abdominal tumor: a case report,” Cases Journal, vol. 3, no. 1, article no. 16, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. R. Sierra, W. C. Brunner, J. T. Murphy, J. B. Dunne, and D. J. Scott, “Laparoscopic marsupialization of a giant posttraumatic splenic cyst,” JSLS: Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons/Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 384–388, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. K. Chakradhar, S. Prasad, S. Kumar, and M. Valiathan, “A rare presentation of splenic tuberculosis with a pseudocyst,” BMJ Case Reports, vol. 2014, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. V. K. Kundal, M. Gajdhar, R. Kundal, C. Sharma, D. Agarwal, and A. Meena, “Giant epithelial non-parasitic splenic cyst,” Journal of Case Reports, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 106–109, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. A. H. Khan, A. L. Bensoussan, A. Ouimet, H. Blanchard, A. Grignon, and M. Ndoye, “Partial splenectomy for benign cystic lesions of the spleen,” Journal of Pediatric Surgery, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 749–752, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. C. Palanivelu, M. Rangarajan, M. V. Madankumar, and S. J. John, “Laparoscopic internal marsupializaton for large nonparasitic splenic cysts: effective organ-preserving technique,” World Journal of Surgery, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 20–25, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. Abd Ellatif, “Giant Splenic Cyst with Hypersplenism: laparoscopic Splenectomy,” Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Research, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 549–551, 2013. View at Google Scholar