Case Reports in Hematology

Case Reports in Hematology / 2017 / Article

Case Report | Open Access

Volume 2017 |Article ID 5083463 |

Agata M. Bogusz, "EBV-Negative Monomorphic B-Cell Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder with Marked Morphologic Pleomorphism and Pathogenic Mutations in ASXL1, BCOR, CDKN2A, NF1, and TP53", Case Reports in Hematology, vol. 2017, Article ID 5083463, 8 pages, 2017.

EBV-Negative Monomorphic B-Cell Posttransplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder with Marked Morphologic Pleomorphism and Pathogenic Mutations in ASXL1, BCOR, CDKN2A, NF1, and TP53

Academic Editor: Yusuke Shiozawa
Received25 Oct 2016
Revised18 Feb 2017
Accepted19 Mar 2017
Published10 Apr 2017


Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs) are a diverse group of lymphoid or plasmacytic proliferations frequently driven by Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). EBV-negative PTLDs appear to represent a distinct entity. This report describes an unusual case of a 33-year-old woman that developed a monomorphic EBV-negative PTLD consistent with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) 13 years after heart-lung transplant. Histological examination revealed marked pleomorphism of the malignant cells including nodular areas reminiscent of classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) with abundant large, bizarre Hodgkin-like cells. By immunostaining, the malignant cells were immunoreactive for CD45, CD20, CD79a, PAX5, BCL6, MUM1, and p53 and negative for CD15, CD30, latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1), and EBV-encoded RNA (EBER). Flow cytometry demonstrated lambda light chain restricted CD5 and CD10 negative B-cells. Fluorescence in situ hybridization studies (FISH) were negative for cMYC, BCL2, and BCL6 rearrangements but showed deletion of TP53 and monosomy of chromosome 17. Next-generation sequencing studies (NGS) revealed numerous genetic alterations including 6 pathogenic mutations in ASXL1, BCOR, CDKN2A, NF1, and TP53(x2) genes and 30 variants of unknown significance (VOUS) in ABL1, ASXL1, ATM, BCOR, BCORL1, BRNIP3, CDH2, CDKN2A, DNMT3A, ETV6, EZH2, FBXW7, KIT, NF1, RUNX1, SETPB1, SF1, SMC1A, STAG2, TET2, TP53, and U2AF2.

1. Introduction

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs) are lymphoid and plasmacytic proliferations that arise in the setting of immunosuppression in a recipient of a solid organ transplant (SOT) or hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) [1]. PTLDs affect 1–25% of posttransplant patients, with the highest incidents for intestinal and multiorgan transplant, followed by heart and lung transplants [2]. The revised 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) categorizes PTLDs into the following categories: plasmacytic hyperplasia PTLD, infectious mononucleosis PTLD, florid follicular hyperplasia PTLD, polymorphic PTLD, monomorphic PTLD (B- and T-/NK-cell types), and classical Hodgkin (cHL) lymphoma PTLD [3]. The vast majority of PTLDs are of B-cell origin and are usually associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection; however a significant subset are EBV-negative [1, 4, 5]. Early onset PTLDs are typically Epstein-Barr virus- (EBV-) driven lymphoproliferations and may be polyclonal or oligoclonal, whereas late onset ones are typically monoclonal lymphoid malignancies that can lack EBV association. The pathogenesis of non-EBV-related PTLD may be similar to non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas (NHL) [6]. EBV-negative PTLD has been proposed to be a distinct entity and typically presents as a late complication of transplantation with a median of 50–60 months [5, 710]. EBV-negative PTLDs typically display monomorphic morphology [1]. Here we present a rare case of EBV-negative PTLD occurring more than a decade after solid organ transplant (SOT) and presenting with a large variety of morphologies of the malignant cells and numerous genetic alterations comprising 6 pathogenic mutations (ASXL1, BCOR, CDKN2A, NF1, and TP53x2) and 30 variants of unknown significance (VOUSs).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Histology and Immunohistochemistry

Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Immunohistochemical staining was performed on 4 μm tissue sections using an Autostainer (Leica BOND platform, Buffalo Grove, IL) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, sections were deparaffinized in xylene and graded alcohols. Detection of the antibodies was performed using a chromogenic substrate, diaminobenzene (Dako).

2.2. Molecular Analysis for Clonality

DNA was extracted from FFPE small bowel tumor tissue and analyzed for clonality as described previously [11]. Briefly, PCR amplification was performed with two sets of fluorescently labeled primers (InVivoScribe Technologies) that hybridize to a conserved V-framework, framework 2 (FR2), and framework 3 (FR3) regions and the conserved J-region of immunoglobulin heavy chain (IGH) gene. The PCR products were subsequently size-separated by capillary electrophoresis on a 3500xL Genetic Analyzer (Life Technologies). Data were analyzed (GeneMapper v5.0 software) and examined for peak patterns consistent with a clonal expansion.

2.3. Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) Analysis

FISH was performed on 3 μm FFPE tissue sections using the MYC break-apart probe, BCL6 break-apart probe, BCL2 break-apart probe, and TP53/NF1 probes (all from Metasystems Group, Inc.) according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Briefly, slides were deparaffinized using xylene incubation (×3), followed by ethanol wash steps (100%, 70%). The slides were treated with Dako pretreatment solution (Dako, Inc., K5799) prior to hybridization, followed by digestion with pepsin (37°C, 15 min). Slides were then dehydrated in ethanol (70, 85, and 100%) and dried and the FISH probes were added for incubation overnight. The next day, the slides were washed, counterstained with DAPI, manually visualized, and scored.

2.4. Gene Mutation Analysis

Mutational analysis of FFPE tissue samples was performed by the University of Pennsylvania at the Center for Personalized Diagnostics as described previously [11]. The genes sequenced were part of a custom, targeted next-generation sequencing amplicon panel testing for 68 hematologic malignancy-associated genes (ABL1, ASXL1, ATM, BCOR, BCORL1, BIRC3, BRAF, CALR, CBL, CDKN2A, CEBPA, CSF1R, CSF3R, DDX3X, DNMT3A, ETV6, EZH2, FAM5C, FBXW7, FLT3, GATA2, GNAS, HNRNPK, IDH1, IDH2, IL7R, JAK2, KIT, KLHL6, KRAS, MAP2K1, MAPK1, MIR142, MPL, MYC, MYCN, MYD88, NF1, NOTCH1, NOTCH2, NPM1, NRAS, PDGFRA, PHF6, POT1, PRPF40B, PTEN, PTPN11, RAD21, RIT1, RUNX1, SETBP1, SF1, SF3A1, SF3B1, SMC1A, SRSF2, STAG2, TBL1XR1, TET2, TP53, TPMT, U2AF1, U2AF2, WT1, XPO1, ZMYM3, and ZRSR2) (TruSeq Custom Amplicon, Illumina Inc.) based on previously described analyses [12, 13]. A custom bioinformatics pipeline was utilized to detect alterations [14] and manual data review was performed with variants compared with our knowledgebase and online databases for further curation, using human reference sequence UCSC build hg 19 (NCBI build 37.1) for comparison. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with a minor allele frequency (MAF) > 0.1% were classified as benign and were not reported based on the Exome Variant Server (, the ExAC browser (, and dbSNP. Reported variants used nomenclature that is based on the Human Genome Variation Society nomenclature guidelines ( and internally categorized into five categories (benign, likely benign, variant of uncertain significance, likely pathogenic, and pathogenic); the categories “likely benign,” “variant of uncertain significance,” and “likely pathogenic” were reported as variants of uncertain significance (VOUSs).

3. Case Presentation

A 33-year-old female presented with progressive cramps, emesis, and alternating constipation and diarrhea. The patient received a heart and unilateral lung transplant 13 years prior to presentation for treatment of end-stage congenital heart disease (single ventricle, dextrocardia, and severe pulmonary stenosis). Her posttransplant course was complicated by severe cytomegalovirus (CMV) pneumonia and allograft dysfunction, including an acute rejection of her heart within three months and an episode of lung rejection seven years after transplant. The patient was subsequently stable on immunosuppression (azathioprine, 50 mg oral, 3 times a day, and prednisone, 5 mg oral, once a day). The patient was referred for evaluation at our institution. A computed tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen showed thickening of the jejunum. Surgical resection revealed a 9 cm exophytic tumor in the small bowel.

4. Pathologic Findings

Histological examination by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining (Figure 1) revealed a large morphologic heterogeneity in this specimen. Under low power there were present nodular cellular areas intercepted by thick bands of fibrosis (Figure 1(a)) reminiscent of nodular sclerosis type cHL, areas with more monomorphic large immunoblast-like cells and foci of necrosis (Figure 1(b)) and areas with monomorphic appearance with admixed abundant eosinophils (Figure 1(c)). Higher power examination of the nodular areas revealed numerous large, highly atypical cells (Figure 1(d)) with a variety of morphologies (Figures 1(j)1(r)) including lacunar cells, multinucleated cells, markedly hyperchromatic cells, mummified cells, Reed-Sternberg-like cells, and popcorn cells. Higher power examination of the monomorphic appearing areas revealed a remarkable diversity of morphology, including areas with monotonous medium to large cells (Figure 1(e)), increased infiltrating eosinophils (Figure 1(f)), prominence of plasmacytoid cells (Figure 1(g)), clear large cells (Figure 1(h)), and spindle-shaped cells (Figure 1(i)).

Immunohistochemistry revealed that the malignant cells, including the very large atypical cells, were immunoreactive for CD45, CD20 (Figure 2(a)), CD79a, PAX5 (Figure 2(b)), BCL6 (Figure 2(c)), and MUM1 (predominantly in the larger cells, Figure 2(d)) and were negative for CD3, CD5, CD10 (Figure 2(e)), CD30 (Figure 2(f)), CD15 (Figure 2(g)), LMP1, EBER (Figure 2(h)), and CMV. BCL2 was positive only in rare cells (Figure 2(i)) and cMYC (Figure 2(j)) was only focally positive but was overall negative (<40% positive cells, Figure 2(j)). The proliferation index as determined by Ki67 staining was high at 70% (Figure 2(k)). Staining for p53 was strongly and diffusely positive (Figure 2(l)).

Flow cytometry demonstrated a population of variably sized surface lambda light chain restricted CD5 and CD10 negative B-cells that represented the predominant population of monotonous large immunoblast-like B-cells. A diagnosis was rendered of monomorphic PTLD (B-cell type) with features of a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, EBV-negative with pleomorphic, HL/RS-like cells.

Fluorescence in situ hybridization studies (FISH) were negative for cMYC, BCL2, and BCL6 rearrangements but revealed deletion of TP53 in 14/100 cells (Figure 3(a)) and monosomy of chromosome 17 in 20/100 cells (although these results fall within the range of the cutoff of 20–30% on paraffin tissue) (Figure 3(b)) as compared to normal cells (Figure 3(c)).

Molecular studies for IGH gene rearrangement performed on the DNA extracted from the small bowel tumor revealed a 163.85-base pair (bp) peak and a 243.99 bp peak in framework 2 (FR2) as well as a 78 bp peak in framework 3 (FR3) (Figure 4) confirming a clonal process.

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) studies revealed numerous genetic alterations including 6 pathogenic mutations in ASXL1, BCOR, CDKN2A, NF1, and TP53(x2) genes and 30 variants of unknown significance (VOUSs) in ABL1, ASXL1, ATM, BCOR, BCORL1, BRNIP3, CDH2, CDKN2A, DNMT3A, ETV6, EZH2, FBXW7, KIT, NF1, RUNX1, SETPB1, SF1, SMC1A, STAG2, TET2, TP53, and U2AF2 (Table 1).

GeneProtein changecDNA changeCategorizationAllele frequency

BCORp.P1621Qfs 53c.4862delCPathogenic31.07
CDKN2Ap.R58 c.C172TPathogenic38.3
NF1p.Q2147 c.6439_6441delinsTAGPathogenic35.66
SETBP1p.R54Hc.G161ALikely benign45.23
TP53p.R306 c.C916TPathogenic40.02

ABL1: Abelson Tyrosine Kinase; ASXL1: Additional Sex Combs-Like 1; BCOR: BCL6 Corepressor; BCORL1: BCL6 Corepressor-Like 1; BRINP3: BMP/Retinoic Acid Inducible Neural Specific 3; CDH2: Cadherin 2; CDKN2A: cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A; DNMT3A: DNA methyltransferase 3 alpha; ETV6: ETS (erythroblast transformation-specific) variant 6; EZH2: enhancer of zeste 2 polycomb repressive complex 2 subunit; FBXW7: F-Box and WD Repeat Domain Containing 7; KIT: KIT Protooncogene Receptor Tyrosine Kinase; NF1: Neurofibromin 1; RUNX1: Runt Related Transcription Factor 1; SETBP1: SET Binding Protein 1; SF1: Splicing Factor 1: SMC1A: Structural Maintenance of Chromosomes 1A; STAG2: Stromal Antigen 2: TET2: Tet Methylcytosine Dioxygenase 2: TP53: Tumor Protein P53; U2AF2: U2 Small Nuclear RNA Auxiliary Factor 2.

5. Clinical Follow-Up

Staging of the patient confirmed that her disease was confined to the small bowel. The patient’s immunosuppression was decreased and following recovery from surgery she received rituximab and R-CY/VP16 (rituximab-cyclophosphamide/etoposide) with no response and subsequently responded to R-CHOP (4 cycles). The patient appeared in complete remission by CT scan ten months after surgery but developed pleural effusion following the 4th cycle of R-CHOP and was also found to have retraction of the transplanted lung and anemia (Hg 9.5 g/dL). While receiving the next cycle of R-CHOP and transfusion 4 weeks later, the patient went into cardiac arrest and expired at the hospital. An autopsy was not requested. The cause of death was listed as shock, respiratory failure, hypotension, and asystole related to acute transplant rejection.

6. Discussion

PTLDs are a clinically and morphologically heterogeneous group of diseases that occur after organ transplant. Histologically, PTLDs comprise a spectrum of lymphoid proliferations that range from polyclonal expansions to overt lymphomas [3]. This case is characterized by very late onset and EBV negativity. EBV-negative PTLDs typically present years after transplantation and display monomorphic morphology [15]. In rare cases a progression from an EBV-positive to EBV-negative neoplasm has been suspected [16]. The prognosis of EBV-negative PTLD appears to be similar to EBV-positive cases [17]. The reduction of immunosuppressive therapy is considered the first step in treating PTLD; however patients with poor prognostic factors, such as late onset disease and EBV negativity, typically require chemotherapy and immunotherapy [15]. It has been postulated that EBV-negative PTLD represents a distinct entity [5, 8]. In support of this hypothesis, gene expression profiling studies have revealed clear differences between EBV-positive and EBV-negative PTLDs [10, 18].

This case is unique in that several distinct morphologies coexist within this monomorphic PTLD including a nodular sclerosis Hodgkin lymphoma- (HL-) like component and large B-cell lymphoma component with diverse morphology (Figure 1). The large atypical HL/RS-like cells within the HL-like component were negative for CD15 and CD30 and immunoreactive for CD45 and CD20 (Figure 2) ruling out cHL PTLD and supporting the diagnosis of PTLD, DLBCL type. Since the patient’s tumor was negative for CD10 and positive for BCL6 and MUM1, it can be classified as the more aggressive non-GCB (germinal center B-cell) type DLBCL [19].

NGS studies revealed a large number of genetic alterations in the patient’s tumor (Table 1) with most of the altered genes involved in chromatin remodeling and DNA repair. This included 2 pathogenic mutations and 1 VOUS in TP53. A recent paper demonstrates that EBV-negative PTLDs frequently contain TP53 mutations implicating p53 role in the disease process [9]. The pathogenesis of EBV-negative PTLD is not well understood but frequent TP53 mutations might be one of the contributory factors [9]. Staining for p53 protein was uniformly strong in the tumor, correlating well with the presence of mutations. Expression of p53 in de novo DLBCL was shown to be correlated with inferior outcome [20, 21]. In addition to TP53 mutations, FISH studies of the patient’s tumor showed deletion of TP53 in 14/100 cells and monosomy of chromosome 17 in 20/100 cells (Figure 3).

Other pathogenic mutations in this tumor affected ASXL1, BCOR, CDKN2A, and NF1 genes (Table 1). ASXL1 is one of the most mutated genes in myeloid neoplasms including chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MDS/MPN) [22] and only rare mutations have been reported in lymphoid malignancies such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) [23]. Mutations in ASXL1 are generally associated with poor prognosis in myeloid malignancies [24]. BCOR encodes BCL6 interacting corepressor. BCL6 is a zinc-finger transcriptional repressor and key regulator of germinal center reaction that is frequently translocated and hypermutated in DLBCL [25]. However, NGS studies of 388 cases of B-cell lymphomas revealed only one Burkitt lymphoma case with a missense BCOR mutation (S1295T) [26]. Interestingly, frequent BCOR aberrations were reported in extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type [26]. In addition to one pathogenic mutation in BCOR, we have detected three VOUSs in BCOR and two VOUSs in BCORL1 gene. BCOR and BCORL1 are homologous X-linked genes that act as corepressors that were found to be recurrently mutated in AML. About 50% of BCOR/BCORL1-mutated cases also carry DNTM3A mutations and we have detected a VOUS in DNTM3A gene (Table 1). CDKN2A mutations have been previously reported in DLBCL [27]. Interestingly, proteins encoded by TP53 and CDKN2A are components of the p53 pathway and it has been previously reported that alterations in these genes are independent in DLBCL, providing additional tumor growth advantage [28]. NF1 mutations have been reported in rare cases of orbital DLBCL [29].

The VOUSs detected in this patient’s sample (Table 1) included many genes that are typically mutated in myeloid malignancies (ABL1, ASXL1, BCOR, BCORL1, BRNIP3, DNMT3A, ETV6, EZH2, KIT, RUNX1, SETPB1, SF1, SMC1A, STAG2, TET2, and U2AF2) and not commonly seen in lymphoid malignancies. The significance of these findings is unclear but may suggest the pathogenesis of EBV-negative monomorphic PTLD is much more complex than that of EBV-driven PTLD. It has been proposed to stratify PTLD according to the histological subtype and EBV status in future clinical trials so as to better understand the mechanisms underlying the PTLD lymphomagenesis [30].

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.


The author is grateful to David Lieberman (University of Pennsylvania) for performing the NGS analysis, to April Schrank-Hacker (University of Pennsylvania) for performing FISH studies, and to Dr. Vivianna Van Deerlin (University of Pennsylvania) for performing IGH clonality analysis.


  1. S. H. Swerdlow, E. Campo, N. L. Harris et al., WHO Classsification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues, IARC Press, Lyon, France, 2008.
  2. J. Morscio, D. Dierickx, and T. Tousseyn, “Molecular pathogenesis of B-cell posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder: what do we know so far?” Clinical and Developmental Immunology, vol. 2013, Article ID 150835, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. S. H. Swerdlow, E. Campo, S. A. Pileri et al., “The 2016 revision of the World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms,” Blood, vol. 127, no. 20, pp. 2375–2390, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. D. A. Thorley-Lawson and A. Gross, “Persistence of the Epstein-Barr virus and the origins of associated lymphomas,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 350, no. 13, pp. 1328–1337, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. B. P. Nelson, M. A. Nalesnik, D. W. Bahler, J. Locker, J. J. Fung, and S. H. Swerdlow, “Epstein-Barr virus-negative post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders: a distinct entity?” American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 375–385, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. A. L. Taylor, R. Marcus, and J. A. Bradley, “Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) after solid organ transplantation,” Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 155–167, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. G. Dotti, R. Fiocchi, T. Motta et al., “Epstein-Barr virus-negative lymphoproliferate disorders in long-term survivors after heart, kidney, and liver transplant,” Transplantation, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 827–833, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  8. V. Leblond, F. Davi, F. Charlotte et al., “Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders not associated with Epstein-Barr virus: a distinct entity?” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 2052–2059, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. E. L. Courville, S. Yohe, D. Chou et al., “EBV-negative monomorphic B-cell post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders are pathologically distinct from EBV-positive cases and frequently contain TP53 mutations,” Modern Pathology, vol. 29, pp. 1200–1211, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. J. Finalet Ferreiro, J. Morscio, D. Dierickx et al., “EBV-positive and EBV-negative posttransplant diffuse large B cell lymphomas have distinct genomic and transcriptomic features,” American Journal of Transplantation, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 414–425, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. J. Hatem, A. M. Schrank-Hacker, C. D. Watt et al., “Marginal zone lymphoma-derived interfollicular diffuse large B-cell lymphoma harboring 20q12 chromosomal deletion and missense mutation of BIRC3 gene: a case report,” Diagnostic Pathology, vol. 11, no. 1, article 137, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. C. E. Sloan, M. R. Luskin, A. M. Boccuti et al., “A modified integrated genetic model for risk prediction in younger patients with acute myeloid leukemia,” PLoS ONE, vol. 11, no. 4, Article ID e0153016, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. J. P. Patel, M. Gönen, M. E. Figueroa et al., “Prognostic relevance of integrated genetic profiling in acute myeloid leukemia,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 366, no. 12, pp. 1079–1089, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. R. Daber, S. Sukhadia, and J. J. D. Morrissette, “Understanding the limitations of next generation sequencing informatics, an approach to clinical pipeline validation using artificial data sets,” Cancer Genetics, vol. 206, no. 12, pp. 441–448, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. Z. Al-Mansour, B. P. Nelson, and A. M. Evens, “Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD): risk factors, diagnosis, and current treatment strategies,” Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 173–183, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. M. R. Ambrosio, B. J. Rocca, A. Ginori et al., “A look into the evolution of Epstein-Barr virus-induced lymphoproliferative disorders: a case study,” American Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 144, no. 5, pp. 817–822, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. M. R. Luskin, D. S. Heil, K. S. Tan et al., “The Impact of EBV status on characteristics and outcomes of posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder,” American Journal of Transplantation, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 2665–2673, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. F. E. Craig, L. R. Johnson, S. A. K. Harvey et al., “Gene expression profiling of epstein-barr virus-positive and -negative monomorphic B-cell posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders,” Diagnostic Molecular Pathology, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 158–168, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. C. P. Hans, D. D. Weisenburger, T. C. Greiner et al., “Confirmation of the molecular classification of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma by immunohistochemistry using a tissue microarray,” Blood, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 275–282, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. X. J. Wang, L. Jeffrey Medeiros, C. E. Bueso-Ramos et al., “P53 expression correlates with poorer survival and augments the negative prognostic effect of MYC rearrangement, expression or concurrent MYC/BCL2 expression in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma,” Modern Pathology, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 194–203, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. Y. Xie, M. Ajaz Bulbul, L. Ji et al., “P53 expression is a strong marker of inferior survival in de novo diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and may have enhanced negative effect with MYC coexpression: A Single Institutional Clinicopathologic Study,” American Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 141, no. 4, pp. 593–604, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. J. Alvarez Argote and C. A. Dasanu, “ASXL1 mutations in myeloid neoplasms: pathogenetic considerations, impact on clinical outcomes and survival,” Current Medical Research and Opinion, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. V. Quesada, L. Conde, N. Villamor et al., “Exome sequencing identifies recurrent mutations of the splicing factor SF3B1 gene in chronic lymphocytic leukemia,” Nature Genetics, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 47–52, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. V. Gelsi-Boyer, M. Brecqueville, R. Devillier, A. Murati, M.-J. Mozziconacci, and D. Birnbaum, “Mutations in ASXL1 are associated with poor prognosis across the spectrum of malignant myeloid diseases,” Journal of Hematology and Oncology, vol. 5, article 12, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. K. Basso and R. Dalla-Favera, “Roles of BCL6 in normal and transformed germinal center B cells,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 247, no. 1, pp. 172–183, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. A. Dobashi, N. Tsuyama, R. Asaka et al., “Frequent BCOR aberrations in extranodal NK/T-Cell lymphoma, nasal type,” Genes Chromosomes and Cancer, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 460–471, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. S. Dubois, P.-J. Viailly, S. Mareschal et al., “Next-generation sequencing in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma highlights molecular divergence and therapeutic opportunities: A LYSA Study,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 2919–2928, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. M. B. Møller, Y. Ino, A.-M. Gerdes, K. Skjødt, D. N. Louis, and N. T. Pedersen, “Aberrations of the p53 pathway components p53, MDM2 and CDKN2A appear independent in diffuse large B cell lymphoma,” Leukemia, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 453–459, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. A. K. Cani, M. Soliman, D. H. Hovelson et al., “Comprehensive genomic profiling of orbital and ocular adnexal lymphomas identifies frequent alterations in MYD88 and chromatin modifiers: new routes to targeted therapies,” Modern Pathology, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 685–697, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. J. Morscio and T. Tousseyn, “Recent insights in the pathogenesis of post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorders,” World Journal of Transplantation, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 505–516, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2017 Agata M. Bogusz. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.