Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Case Reports in Infectious Diseases
Volume 2018, Article ID 9128560, 3 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9128560
Case Report

A Case of Pacemaker Endocarditis Caused by Aerococcus urinae

1Department of Infectious Diseases, Hospital of Halland, Halmstad, Sweden
2Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden
3Department of Clinical Sciences, Division of Infection Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
4Division for Infectious Diseases, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden

Correspondence should be addressed to Magnus Rasmussen; es.ul.dem@nessumsar.sungam

Received 13 December 2017; Accepted 7 February 2018; Published 5 March 2018

Academic Editor: Alexandre R. Marra

Copyright © 2018 Sandra Samuelsson et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background. Aerococcus urinae has lately been acknowledged as a cause of infective endocarditis (IE) especially in older males with underlying urinary tract disorders. In this population, cardiac implanted electronical devices (CIED) are not uncommon, but despite the capacity of A. urinae to form biofilm in vitro, no cases of aerococcal CIED infections have been reported to date. Case Presentation. An 84-year-old male with pacemaker was admitted with dysuria one month after a transurethral procedure for urinary bladder cancer. A. urinae was isolated from urine and blood. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was without signs of vegetation on valves or pacing cables. The patient was treated with a twelve-day course of β-lactam antibiotics. Forty days after the initial admission, the patient was readmitted due to malaise, general pain of the joints, chills, and renewed blood cultures grew A. urinae. TEE demonstrated a 10 × 5 mm vegetation on either the tricuspid valve or one of the pacing cables. The pacemaker system was completely removed and demonstrated macroscopic signs of infection. A temporary system was implanted, and after 14 days of penicillin G treatment, a new system permanent system was implanted. Total treatment time was 40 days. Recovery was uneventful. Conclusion. This report demonstrates that A. urinae can cause CIED infection. In patients with A. urinae bacteremia and a CIED, this risk must be considered, especially if bacteremia reoccurs.

1. Introduction

Aerococcus urinae is a Gram-positive bacterium which can cause urinary tract infections (UTIs), bacteremia, and infective endocarditis (IE) [13]. After the introduction of MALDI-TOF MS for species determination in medical microbiology, A. urinae has been increasingly identified as a relatively common cause of both UTIs and bacteremia [4, 5]. Many cases of IE caused by A. urinae have been reported [6], but in a larger case series, this complication to bacteremia was found to occur only in around 10% of cases [5]. IE caused by A. urinae mainly affects older males with underlying urinary tract conditions, and the prognosis is relatively favourable despite the advanced age and many comorbidities of the patients [3, 7]. A. urinae has been described to induce aggregation of human platelets in vitro and is able to form biofilms on plastic surfaces, two potential mechanisms of importance for the pathogenesis of IE [8, 9]. A particular form of IE is an infection where bacteria adhere to the leads of transvenously coronary implanted electronical devices (CIED), such as a pacemaker. In this type of infection, adherence of bacteria to the foreign material and a subsequent formation of biofilm are believed to be important [10]. CIED infections are treated with antibiotics and device removal, a procedure not without risks. CIED infection with A. urinae has to our knowledge not been reported previously.

2. Case Presentation

An 84-year-old male presented with a medical history of sarcoma in 1999 located on the right flank (treated with surgical removal, chemotherapy, and radiation), ischemic heart disease, atrial fibrillation, and a pacemaker (St. Jude 5816, atrial lead Medtronic 4076, and ventricular lead Medtronic 4074) since 2010 due to sick sinus syndrome and AV block II Mobitz type 2. Three months prior to the present episode, he was diagnosed with urinary bladder cancer (pTaG1), and one month prior to the present admission, he underwent a diagnostic transurethral resection of bladder tissue (TUR-B).

On admission, the patient reported malaise and dysuria since the TUR-B. He was afebrile and respiratory and circulatory stable and had macroscopic haematuria, C-reactive protein (CRP) of 204 mg/L, and leukocytes of 12 × 109/L. After cultures had been taken from blood and urine, he was admitted to the Infectious Diseases Clinic. On the third day, blood (4/4 bottles) and urine cultures grew A. urinae (>105 cfu/mL). Species determination was performed with MALDI-TOF MS (Bruker Microflex) with a score of 2.23. Antibiotic treatment with ampicillin 2 g × 3 was initiated. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was performed, and no signs of vegetation on valves or pacing leads could be demonstrated. After five days, the patient’s condition had improved, CRP was 124 mg/L, and he was discharged with amoxicillin 500 mg three times daily for another seven days.

Forty days after the initial admission, the patient was readmitted due to a two-week history of malaise and general pain of the joints. Two days before, he experienced chills but was on admission afebrile and respiratory and circulatory stable, CRP was 250 mg/L, and leukocytes were 21 × 109/L. Treatment with intravenous penicillin G 3 g four times daily was initiated, and renewed blood cultures grew A. urinae (6/6 bottles), whereas the urine culture was negative. Minimum inhibitory concentrations were 0.008 mg/L for penicillin G, 0.25 mg/L for ceftriaxone, and 256 mg/L for tobramycin. A renewed TEE demonstrated a 10 × 5 mm vegetation on either the tricuspid valve or one of the pacing leads (Figure 1). After 19 days of treatment using penicillin G 3 g four times daily, the patient was referred to a tertiary centre for pacemaker system extraction. The extraction was performed using transvenous techniques, the device and leads were completely removed without complications, and a temporary VVI pacemaker was implanted on the ipsilateral side. The explanted electrode demonstrated macroscopic signs of infection in the form of nonfibrous material. Culture from the tip was however negative. Two weeks after extraction, a permanent dual-chamber device was implanted at the contralateral side while the patient was still treated with penicillin G.

Figure 1: TEE demonstrating the lead (long arrow) and the vegetation (short arrow) attached to the lead.

Thirty-seven days after the second admission, the patient was discharged with ceftriaxone 2g daily for another three days. The recovery is uneventful. On follow-up 4 weeks after the end of the treatment, the patient was recovered apart from some shortness of breath during walks.

3. Discussion

Despite that A. urinae is a well-described cause of IE and that the bacterium has the potential to form biofilm on foreign materials, this is the first description of CIED infection caused by this bacterium. Upon the initial admission, this patient was subjected to TEE which did not identify vegetations on the leads. The CIED infection thus developed as a complication to the initial episode of bacteremia. Upon readmission, there was suspicion of a complicating IE or CIED infection and TEE demonstrated vegetations on one lead. The subsequent delay to extraction was due to a regional limitation in the capacity for device extraction. Lead extraction was without complications and a temporary pacemaker on the ipsilateral side was in place for two weeks before a new permanent pacemaker was implanted.

IE with A. urinae is typically treated with a β-lactam antibiotic, and we choose penicillin to which the bacterium had very low MIC [11]. Aminoglycosides are often added to the treatment despite that synergism between β-lactams and aminoglycosides is not always present [7, 11, 12]. In our case, MIC towards aminoglycosides was high, and cure of the patient was dependent on lead extraction rather than on antibiotic treatment. Therefore, aminoglycosides were not given.

The patient described here is prototypic for invasive infections with A. urinae. He is male, above 80 years old, and has urinary bladder cancer, all factors associated with A. urinae bacteremia [3, 5, 13]. In the first episode, the urinary tract was the likely focus of infection demonstrated by both the symptoms and bacteriuria of the patient. In the recurring episode, however, the focus of infection was rather the pacemaker system demonstrated by the vegetations on leads and the lack of bacteriuria. Cultures from the tip remained negative, but after a long course of antibiotic treatment this was the expected. In this case, the infection was macroscopically evident, but in less evident cases, 16S rRNA gene PCR and sequencing of material from leads might provide additional information.

The incidence of bacteremia with A. urinae has been estimated to be 1.4 per 100,000 inhabitants per year [5] and is certainly much higher among older people. The prevalence of CIED in the elderly population, at risk for A. urinae bacteremia, is not insignificant. Given the lack of reports about A. urinae CIED infection and the presumed significant number of episodes of A. urinae bacteremia in CIED carriers, the risk for CIED infection in A. urinae bacteremia is likely to be relatively low.

This case report demonstrates that A. urinae can cause CIED infection. In patients with A. urinae bacteremia and a CIED, this risk must be considered, especially if bacteremia recurs.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the Department for Clinical Microbiology, Hospital of Halland, Halmstad, for important help and Michael Öhman, Department of Clinical Physiology, Hospital of Halland, Halmstad, for help with TEE images.

References

  1. M. Aguirre and M. D. Collins, “Phylogenetic analysis of some Aerococcus-like organisms from urinary tract infections: description of Aerococcus urinae sp. nov.,” Journal of General Microbiology, vol. 138, no. 2, pp. 401–405, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. J. Christensen, B. Korner, and H. Kjaergaard, “Aerococcus-like organism–an unnoticed urinary tract pathogen,” APMIS, vol. 97, no. 1–6, pp. 539–546, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. J. J. Christensen, I. P. Jensen, J. Faerk, B. Kristensen, R. Skov, and B. Korner, “Bacteremia/septicemia due to Aerococcus-like organisms: report of seventeen cases: Danish ALO Study Group,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 943–947, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. E. Senneby, A. C. Petersson, and M. Rasmussen, “Epidemiology and antibiotic susceptibility of aerococci in urinary cultures,” Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 149–151, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. E. Senneby, L. Göransson, S. Weiber, and M. Rasmussen, “A population-based study of aerococcal bacteraemia in the MALDI-TOF MS-era,” European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 755–762, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. Rasmussen, “Aerococcus: an increasingly acknowledged human pathogen,” Clinical Microbiology and Infection, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 22–27, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. T. Sunnerhagen, B. Nilson, L. Olaison, and M. Rasmussen, “Clinical and microbiological features of infective endocarditis caused by aerococci,” Infection, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 167–173, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. O. Shannon, M. Mörgelin, and M. Rasmussen, “Platelet activation and biofilm formation by Aerococcus urinae, an endocarditis-causing pathogen,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 78, no. 10, pp. 4268–4275, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. R. Fitzgerald, T. J. Foster, and D. Cox, “The interaction of bacterial pathogens with platelets,” Nature Reviews Microbiology, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 445–457, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. Nagpal, L. M. Baddour, and M. R. Sohail, “Microbiology and pathogenesis of cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections,” Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 433–441, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. Skov, J. J. Christensen, B. Korner, N. Frimodt-Møller, and F. Espersen, “In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility of Aerococcus urinae to 14 antibiotics, and time-kill curves for penicillin, gentamicin and vancomycin,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 653–658, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. R. Zbinden, P. Santanam, L. Hunziker, B. Leuzinger, and A. Graevenitz von, “Endocarditis due to Aerococcus urinae: diagnostic tests, fatty acid composition and killing kinetics,” Infection, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 122–124, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. E. Senneby, A. C. Petersson, and M. Rasmussen, “Clinical and microbiological features of bacteraemia with Aerococcus urinae,” Clinical Microbiology and Infection, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 546–550, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus