Case Reports in Medicine

Case Reports in Medicine / 2009 / Article

Case Report | Open Access

Volume 2009 |Article ID 520126 |

M. T. R. Parratt, K. Gokaraju, B. G. I. Spiegelberg, J. Miles, S. R. Cannon, T. W. R. Briggs, "Myolipoma Affecting the Erector Spinae: A Case Report in a Child", Case Reports in Medicine, vol. 2009, Article ID 520126, 4 pages, 2009.

Myolipoma Affecting the Erector Spinae: A Case Report in a Child

Academic Editor: Samy S. Iskandar
Received20 Jul 2009
Accepted13 Oct 2009
Published08 Nov 2009


Myolipoma is a rare, benign, lipomatous tumour which most commonly occurs in the retroperitoneum, pelvis, and abdomen. A 4-year-old boy presented with a painless enlarging mass in the left paraspinal region. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) revealed a soft tissue lesion with high fat content and areas of calcification. Excision and histopathological analysis revealed a tumour composed of lobules of mature adipose tissue and broad septa of well-differentiated smooth muscle tissue. The smooth muscle nature of the nonfatty component was demonstrated by a diffuse and strong immunoreactivity for smooth muscle actin and desmin. The mass was reported as a myolipoma. The patient made an unremarkable recovery from surgery and remains healthy with no signs of recurrence at seven years. This paper represents the youngest patient diagnosed with this rare soft tissue tumour which is normally confined to the adult population. A newly reported site of the tumour is also highlighted.

1. Introduction

Myolipoma is an extremely rare benign tumour related to lipoma. It is composed of a mixed proliferation of adipose and smooth muscle tissues presenting, in most patients, as a large painless mass. The tumour is benign with no reported cases of recurrence or metastasis, suggesting that complete surgical excision is curative. Most cases of this tumour have been reported in the retroperitoneum, pelvis, and abdomen. There are fewer reports of the tumour affecting other locations. We present a case of myolipoma affecting the erector spinae muscle group. As far as we are aware, this is the first reported case of the tumour in this location. Furthermore, this case represents the youngest patient diagnosed with a myolipoma.

2. Case History

A four-year-old male was referred to our institution with a two-year history of a painless swelling on the left side of the back. The mass had been slowly increasing in size with the child’s growth. The patient was otherwise healthy. Examination revealed a firm nonfluctuant, nonpulsatile mass in the left paraspinal region. No tethering or overlying skin changes were noted. Further examination was unremarkable. Investigations included ultrasound, computed tomography, and MRI. The ultrasound identified a tense cystic paraspinal mass. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed and demonstrated a well-defined intramuscular mass overlying the lower thoracic spine. The mass was of fat signal intensity with multiple large areas of low signal intensity in keeping with calcification. No involvement of the posterior spinal elements or intraspinal extension was noted (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)). A CT scan was also performed and demonstrated a lesion composed of fat and other soft tissue (Figure 2). There was some peripheral mineralisation. All imaging investigations pointed towards a provisional diagnosis of a tumour with very high fat content which, in this age group, could be lipofibromatosis, fibrolipoma, or lipoblastoma.

The patient attended for excision biopsy and an ovoid tumour (6.3 3.9 2.6 cm) was resected. Macroscopically, the mass appeared covered by a thin layer of skeletal muscle. Histologically, the tumour was composed of lobules of adult-type mature adipose tissue separated by broad septa of well-differentiated smooth muscle tissue. This was characterised by elongated spindle cells with cigar-shaped nuclei and eosinophilic cytoplasms, arranged with a fascicular growth pattern (Figure 3). Both components (fatty and smooth muscle) showed no evidence of cellular atypia, mitoses, or necrosis. The smooth muscle nature of the nonfatty component was demonstrated by a diffuse and strong immunoreactivity for smooth muscle actin and desmin (Figure 4). S100 protein and CD34 were negative in the smooth muscle component. A diagnosis of lipoma with smooth muscle differentiation (myolipoma) was made.

The patient made an unremarkable recovery from surgery and remains healthy with no signs of recurrence.

3. Discussion

Myolipoma was first described by Meis and Enzinger in 1991 [1], who presented a series of nine patients with a previously undescribed benign soft tissue tumour. The tumour was composed of variable amounts of benign smooth muscle and mature adipose tissue. Three tumours were found in the retroperitoneum, two in the inguinal region, two in the abdominal cavity, and one each in the rectus sheath and subcutaneous tissue. This series remains the largest in the literature. It is a rare lesion; only 22 cases have been reported, with varying anatomical locations. However, it may have been reported as “fibrolipoleiomyoma” or “lipoleiomyoma,” particularly in cases of uterine tumours. The tumour most commonly occurs in the pelvis, abdomen, and retroperitoneum. Rarer sites include the eyelid [2], orbit [3], pericardium [4], and the tongue base (as a presentation of Gorlin’s syndrome [5]). Intradural myolipoma has also been reported and can be associated with the tethered cord syndrome [6, 7].

Presentation tends to be with an enlarging painless mass. Most reported cases describe large tumours averaging 16 cm in the greatest dimension [1] and with a diameter of at least 9 cm [8]. It is most prevalent in the 5th and 6th decades of life, with a slight predilection for women [9]. The youngest patient reported, prior to this case, was 12 years old [7], all other reports being in adults.

There is paucity of information regarding the imaging of the lesion. Ultrasound may demonstrate a heterogeneous mass [10]. In uterine tumours, a hypoechoic ring (of myometrium) may be exhibited allowing preoperative diagnosis of myolipoma, which has been confirmed by histopathological evaluation [11, 12]. CT may be helpful in defining whether there is any bony involvement of the tumour, as in this case. Also, it may demonstrate images identical to subcutaneous fat, possibly containing thin septa [13]. Other cases have reported a heterogeneous mass with muscle and fat tissue [10, 12]. The ratio of the two tissues can vary on CT scanning according to the composition of each within the tumour. MRI may demonstrate the smooth muscle elements as areas of intermediate signal intensity on T1-weighted images. In large lesions, calcification may be present [14].

Macroscopically, the tumour is either partially or completely encapsulated and upon sectioning demonstrates a yellow/white cut surface [9]. Histologically, the tumour consists of a mix of mature adipose tissue and bundles or sheets of well-differentiated smooth muscle. The smooth muscle bundles are typically characterised by cytologically bland oval nuclei with eosinophilic fibrillar cytoplasm. The adipose component is entirely mature and lacks floret-like giant cells and lipoblasts [1]. The tumour lacks atypia and mitoses and displays little vascular proliferation [1, 15]. Bizarre, multilobulated nuclei have been reported within the myoid cells, this being considered an expression of a regressive phenomenon, as observed in the “bizarre” leiomyoma of the uterus [15]. The cells are immunoreactive for smooth muscle actin and desmin and may also contain oestrogen and progesterone receptors [16].

The differential diagnosis is important due to the number of lipomatous tumour variants [17]. Dedifferentiated liposarcoma, spindle cell lipoma, angiomyolipoma and leiomyoma with fatty degeneration must all be ruled out. Meis and Enzinger reported that deeply situated tumours were most likely to be confused with well-differentiated liposarcoma [1]. However, myolipoma differs from dedifferentiated liposarcoma due to the absence of atypical hyperchromatic nuclei in the fatty component and cytological atypia in the dedifferentiated component. Spindle cell lipoma is rare in the typical locations of myolipoma and is composed of bland spindle-shaped cells, lacking smooth muscle differentiation. Leiomyoma with fatty degeneration lacks the regular distribution of fat that is present in myolipoma. Angiomyolipoma has medium sized arteries with thick muscular walls as well as HMB-45 reactive epithelioid smooth muscle cells [9]. It is associated with tuberous sclerosis, whereas myolipoma is not. Furthermore, myolipoma is a benign tumour with no malignant potential whereas deep seated atypical lipoma has the potential to dedifferentiate into liposarcoma [18].

Surgical excision is the treatment of choice for these lesions. To date, there are no reports of recurrence and the complication rate is minimal.

This case represents an exceedingly rare and interesting benign tumour. Surgeons and histopathologists should be aware of the lesion in order to correctly diagnose and treat it. We report a new location for the tumour occurring in the youngest patient diagnosed so far. Despite the benign nature of the tumour, radiological investigations may indicate a more sinister diagnosis. Therefore, excisional biopsy in a specialized centre, where the necessary expertise is available, is recommended.


  1. J. M. Meis and F. M. Enzinger, “Myolipoma of soft tissue,” American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 121–125, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  2. N. Sharara, W. R. Lee, and C. Weir, “Myolipoma of the eyelid,” Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 236, no. 8, pp. 630–634, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. A. Nagayama, N. Miyamura, Z. Lu et al., “Light and electron microscopic findings in a patient with orbital myolipoma,” Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 241, no. 9, pp. 773–776, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. O. Ben-Izhak, I. Elmalach, H. Kerner, and L. A. L. Best, “Pericardial myolipoma: a tumour presenting as a mediastinal mass and containing oestrogen receptors,” Histopathology, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 184–186, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  5. L. Barker, S. Lo, and R. Sudderick, “Gorlin's syndrome presenting with myolipoma of tongue base,” Journal of Laryngology and Otology, vol. 122, no. 10, pp. 1130–1132, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. P. G. Brown and E. G. Shaver, “Myolipoma in a tethered cord: case report and review of the literature,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 92, no. 2, supplement, pp. 214–216, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  7. H. Takahashi, Y. Tomita, A. Yagishita, and M. Oda, “Sacral intradural myolipoma causing tethered cord syndrome,” Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 450–453, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  8. K. A. Behranwala, K. Chettiar, M. El-Bahrawy, G. Stamp, and A. K. Kakkar, “Retroperitoneal myolipoma,” World Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 3, article 72, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. S. W. Weiss and J. R. Goldblum, Enzinger and Weiss's Soft Tissue Tumors, Mosby, St. Louis, Miss, USA, 4th edition, 2008.
  10. T. Suzuki, Y. Ueda, M. Shincho et al., “Myolipoma arising from the renal capsule: a case report,” Hinyokika Kiyo, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 349–352, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  11. E. Ekici and K. Vicdan, “Uterine myolipoma: diagnosis by ultrasound,” International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 167–171, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. A. J. Villanueva, A. Martinez-Noguera, C. Perez, M. Clotet, and E. Oliva, “Uterine myolipoma: CT and US,” Abdominal Imaging, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 402–403, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  13. M. D. Murphey, J. F. Carroll, D. J. Flemming et al., “From the archives of the AFIP: benign musculoskeletal lipomatous lesions,” Radiographics, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 1433–1466, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  14. M. O. Moore, M. L. Richardson, B. P. Rubin et al., “Abdominal cavity myolipoma presenting as an enlarging incisional hernia,” Radiology Case Reports, vol. 1, pp. 7–12, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  15. F. Scarpellini, G. Pasquinelli, and S. Damiani, “Subcutaneous myolipoma with bizarre cells: morphological, immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study of a case and review of literature,” Pathologica, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 163–167, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  16. S. Fernández-Aguilar, N. Saint-Aubain, J. L. Dargent, I. Fayt, and J. C. Noel, “Myolipoma of soft tissue: an unusual tumor with expression of estrogen and progesterone receptors. Report of two cases and review of the literature,” Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 81, no. 11, pp. 1088–1090, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. T. Mentzel and C. D. M. Fletcher, “Lipomatous tumours of soft tissues: an update,” Virchows Archiv, vol. 427, no. 4, pp. 353–363, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  18. T. Mentzel, “Lipomatous tumours of the skin and soft tissue. New entities and concepts,” Pathologe, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 441–448, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2009 M. T. R. Parratt et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.