Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Case Reports in Medicine
Volume 2010, Article ID 546904, 3 pages
Case Report

Levosimendan as Treatment Option in Severe Verapamil Intoxication: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Medical Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland

Received 20 January 2010; Revised 9 May 2010; Accepted 8 July 2010

Academic Editor: Bruno Megarbane

Copyright © 2010 Mirjam Osthoff et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Cardiovascular shock due to verapamil intoxication is often refractory to standard resuscitation methods. Recommended therapy includes prevention of further absorption of the drug, inotropic therapy, calcium gluconate, and hyperinsulinemia/euglycemia therapy. Often further measures are needed such as ventricular pacing or mechanical circulatory support. Still, mortality remains high. Levosimendan, an inotropic agent, that enhances myofilament response to calcium, increases myocardial contraction and could therefore be beneficial in verapamil intoxication. Here, we report the case of a 60-year-old patient with clinically severe verapamil poisoning who presented with shock, bradycardia, and sopor. Standard therapy including high-dose inotropes failed to ameliorate the signs of intoxication. But additional therapy with levosimendan led to rapid improvement. Based on this observation, the literature is reviewed focusing on utilization of levosimendan in the treatment of calcium channel blocker overdose. We suggest to consider levosimendan as additional treatment option in patients with cardiovascular shock due to verapamil intoxication that are refractory to standard management.

1. Introduction

Verapamil antagonizes L-type calcium channels and thereby inhibits calcium influx into myocardial and vascular tissue. The negative inotropic and chronotropic effects of verapamil may result in bradycardia, decreased cardiac output, vasodilation of smooth vascular muscle, and cardiovascular collapse [1]. Calcium channel blockers also inhibit the influx of calcium into pancreatic beta cells. This leads to reduced insulin secretion and hyperglycemia [2]. In consideration of these effects, treatment of calcium channel blocker overdose includes volume application, intravenous calcium to increase calcium availability, inotropic therapy, and hyperinsulinemic euglycemia therapy [3]. Even with extensive conventional treatment, requiring high doses of inotropic therapy [411], additional invasive therapies such as pacemaker therapy [5, 9, 10] or IABP insertion [10] are necessary in severe cases to stabilize hemodynamics. However, mortality remains high [12].

Levosimendan, an inotropic agent, acts as a calcium sensitizer and increases the association rate of myosin actin cross-bridges and slows down their dissociation rate by binding to troponin c [13]. Its impact is calcium dependent [13, 14]. Levosimendan also exhibits vasodilation via ATP-sensitive potassium channels in vascular smooth-muscle cells, and recently it also has been shown to act on mitochondrial ATP-sensitive potassium channels [15]. The mechanism is believed to be responsible for its cardioprotective properties in reversing myocardial stunning [15]. The positive inotropic effect of levosimendan seems to be preserved with acidosis [16].

Levosimendan has been successfully used in the setting of acute myocardial failure following myocardial infarction with few side effects [17, 18].

Based on these observations, in theory, levosimendan has the potential to be beneficial in the cardiovascular compromise caused by verapamil overdose.

2. Case Presentation

Here, we present the case of a 60-year-old male patient that was conducted to hospital with the suspicion of cardiogenic shock.

Paramedics were called for a patient, who had treated himself with 6 tablets of verapamil 80 mg within a period of 6 hours for palpitations. He had a history of intermittent supraventricular tachycardia and therefore had been prescribed verapamil as needed. The patient was conscious, blood pressure was 91/51 mmHg, and the pulse was 46 bpm. The patient received isotonic crystalloids and 1 mg of atropine with no change in heart rate during the transport. Upon arrival at the emergency department, vital signs included blood pressure of 98/79 mmHg, pulse of 41 bpm, respiratory rate of 20/min and temperature of 36.1 degree Celsius. The ECG showed sinus arrest and a wide QRS complex. Immediately, the patient was given isotonic crystalloids, calcium gluconate 10% (1 g) intravenously, and 70 U of insulin in dextrose. A transthoracic echocardiography showed diffuse hypokinesia with a slightly reduced ejection fraction. Blood pressure and pulse declined to 70/32 mmHg and 35 bpm, respectively, while the patient became soporous. A bolus of 50  𝜇 g of epinephrine was given, and an epinephrine infusion was started at a rate of 20  𝜇 g/min. The patient was admitted to the intensive care unit, where a central venous catheter and a femoral arterial line were inserted. Bradycardia, hypotension, ECG changes, and sopor persisted despite continued calcium gluconate administration, hyperinsulinemia/euglycemia therapy, and inotropic therapy with epinephrine.

Because of primary failure of standard therapy in this clinically severe calcium antagonist intoxication, levosimendan was added to treatment.

A levosimendan loading dose of 24  𝜇 g/kg was followed by a levosimendan infusion at a rate of 0.1  𝜇 g/kg/h. Within minutes the pulse rate increased steadily to 60 bpm (Figure 1) with reappearance of sinus node activity in the ECG and normalization of the QRS width (Figure 2). The patient regained consciousness but remained hypotensive. Levosimendan was continued for 24 hours. Blood pressure finally stabilized, and epinephrine could be tapered 9 hours after starting levosimendan and stopped after 16 hours. The patient was transferred to the ward after 30 hours and discharged on day 5.

Figure 1: Vital signs in relation to levosimendan application. ABP: arterial blood pressure; NBP: non-invasive blood pressure.
Figure 2: ECG changes in relation to levosimendan adminstration.

3. Discussion

We report a case of verapamil overdose-induced cardiogenic shock. Our patient was resuscitated with conventional treatment including calcium gluconate i.v., hyperinsulinemia/euglycemia therapy, and inotropic therapy with epinephrine according to current recommendations. However, his clinical status, hemodynamics, and ECG alterations did not improve until initiation of levosimendan. Within 15 minutes of infusing the loading dose, the patient regained consciousness, and the pulse rate increased to 60 bpm. Conversion to normofrequent sinus rhythm and stabilisation of blood pressure were achieved during the following 16 hours of continued combined therapy with epinephrine and levosimendan.

In a rodent model of verapamil toxicity levosimendan increased cardiac output; however blood pressure remained low [19]. Hypotension in our patient may have been maintained by levosimendan’s agonistic properties on peripheral vascular K(+)(ATP) channels [19].

In another rat model of verapamil toxicity levosimendan did not improve survival; however it was used as a unique antidote [20]. This may be attributed to levosimendan ability to exacerbate the hypotension induced by verapamil intoxication [20].

Although direct evidence is missing, in two reported cases of calcium channel overdose hemodynamics did not improve despite extensive conventional treatment until initiation of levosimendan [10].

In the case of our patient, the beneficial effect is quite suggestive. First, the heart rate rose simultaneously with application of levosimendan. Second, the patient regained consciousness, despite prolonged hypotension, presumably due to improved organ perfusion. Last, sinus node activity resumed upon initiation of levosimendan therapy, suggesting a beneficial therapeutic effect on not only the contractile function but also cardiac electrophysiology.

4. Conclusions

There is no direct evidence from the literature that levosimendan counteracts the hemodynamic compromise caused by verapamil overdose in humans. However, a beneficial effect is suggestive. In conclusion, levosimendan should be considered as an additional treatment option in verapamil intoxication if standard therapy is insufficient to stabilize hemodynamics.


  1. S. D. Salhanick and M. W. Shannon, “Management of calcium channel antagonist overdose,” Drug Safety, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 65–79, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. J. A. Kline, R. M. Raymond, J. D. Schroeder, and J. A. Watts, “The diabetogenic effects of acute verapamil poisoning,” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, vol. 145, no. 2, pp. 357–362, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  3. N. P. Patel, M. E. Pugh, S. Goldberg, and G. Eiger, “Hyperinsulinemic euglycemia therapy for verapamil poisoning: a review,” American Journal of Critical Care, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 498–503, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  4. E. W. Boyer and M. Shannon, “Treatment of calcium-channel—blocker intoxication with insulin infusion,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 344, no. 22, pp. 1721–1722, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  5. F. C. Erickson, L. J. Ling, G. A. Grande, and D. L. Anderson, “Diltiazem overdose: case report and review,” Journal of Emergency Medicine, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 357–366, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. M. Leone, A. Charvet, A. Delmas, J. Albanèse, C. Martin, and W. A. Boyle, “Terlipressin: a new therapeutic for calcium-channel blockers overdose,” Journal of Critical Care, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 114–115, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. I. Marques, E. Gomes, and J. de Oliveira, “Treatment of calcium channel blocker intoxication with insulin infusion: case report and literature review,” Resuscitation, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 211–213, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. L. Rasmussen, S. E. Husted, and S. P. Johnsen, “Severe intoxication after an intentional overdose of amlodipine,” Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 1038–1040, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. S. W. Snover and V. Bocchino, “Massive diltiazem overdose,” Annals of Emergency Medicine, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 1221–1224, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  10. T. Varpula, J. Rapola, M. Sallisalmi, and J. Kurola, “Treatment of serious calcium channel blocker overdose with levosimendan, a calcium sensitizer,” Anesthesia and Analgesia, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 790–792, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  11. T. H. Yuan, W. P. Kerns II, C. A. Tomaszewski, M. D. Ford, and J. A. Kline, “Insulin-glucose as adjunctive therapy for severe calcium channel antagonist poisoning,” Journal of Toxicology - Clinical Toxicology, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 463–474, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. C. A. Hofer, J. K. Smith, and M. F. Tenholder, “Verapamil intoxication: a literature review of overdoses and discussion of therapeutic options,” American Journal of Medicine, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 431–438, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. H. Haikala and I.-B. Linden, “Mechanisms of action of calcium-sensitizing drugs,” Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. S10–S19, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  14. H. Haikala, J. Kaivola, E. Nissinen, P. Wall, J. Levijoki, and I.-B. Linden, “Cardiac troponin C as a target protein for a novel calcium sensitizing drug, levosimendan,” Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 1859–1866, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  15. P. Pollesello and Z. Papp, “The cardioprotective effects of levosimendan: preclinical and clinical evidence,” Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 257–263, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  16. H. Haikala, E. Nissinen, E. Etemadzadeh, J. Levijoki, and I.-B. Linden, “Troponin C-mediated calcium sensitization induced by levosimendan does not impair relaxation,” Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 794–801, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  17. V. S. Moiseyev, P. Põder, and P. Põder, “Safety and efficacy of a novel calcium sensitizer, levosimendan, in patients with left ventricular failure due to an acute myocardial infarction: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study (RUSSLAN),” European Heart Journal, vol. 23, no. 18, pp. 1422–1432, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. J. T. Fuhrmann, A. Schmeisser, and A. Schmeisser, “Levosimendan is superior to enoximone in refractory cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 2257–2266, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  19. A. Graudins, J. Najafi, and M. P. Rur-Sc, “Treatment of experimental verapamil poisoning with levosimendan utilizing a rodent model of drug toxicity,” Clinical Toxicology, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 50–56, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  20. M. K. Abraham, S. B. Scott, A. Meltzer, and F. Barrueto Jr., “Levosimendan does not improve survival time in a rat model of verapamil toxicity,” Journal of Medical Toxicology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 3–7, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar