Case Reports in Medicine

Case Reports in Medicine / 2010 / Article

Case Report | Open Access

Volume 2010 |Article ID 708348 | 3 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/708348

Relapsed Mantle Cell Lymphoma Presenting as “Sister Mary Joseph Nodule”

Academic Editor: Werner Rabitsch
Received06 Jan 2010
Accepted25 Feb 2010
Published08 Apr 2010

Abstract

The finding of umbilical metastasis has historically been called a “Sister Mary Joseph Nodule”. A few case reports of lymphoma presenting in this manner have been documented. We report a case of relapsed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) presenting as a Sister Mary Joseph's nodule. Although the few reports of lymphoma exhibiting umbilical metastasis suggest that patients may still expect a reasonable response to chemotherapy, this patient experienced multiple relapses, despite aggressive chemotherapy regimens. This clinical course is characteristic of the mantle cell form of non-hodgkin's lymphoma and illustrates a need to seek out more effective therapies.

1. Introduction

Umbilical malignant metastasis is a rare sign of advanced malignancy and usually associated with cancers of the gastrointestinal and reproductive tract [1]. The term “Sister Mary Joseph’s nodule” was coined by Sir Hamilton Bailey, after Sister Mary Joseph Dempsey (1856–1939) who served as surgical assistant to Dr. William Mayo in Rochester, MN. She was the first to observe the association between umbilical nodules, which she named “pants button umbilicus,” and metastatic intraabdominal disease. This discovery was published in 1928 [2]. As was also noted by its namesake, it is generally thought to signify a poor prognosis, with mean survival reported between 8 and 11 months [1, 3, 4].

Interestingly, reports of hematological malignancies presenting in this manner are exceedingly uncommon and when reported, do not necessarily represent intractable disease. In a review of 407 cases of SMJ nodules, only 1 was noted to be of lymphomatous origin [5, 6]. Further review of the literature revealed five cases of SJM nodules determined to be from metastatic lymphoma [510] with four demonstrating significant responses to chemotherapy [710] and two [7, 8] achieving complete remission. All five case reports identified the malignancy as non-Hodgkin lymphoma and two of these were specifically identified as large B-cell lymphomas [8, 9]. None were of MCL origin. In fact, a dedicated search revealed no cases of MCL presenting as SMJ nodule in the literature.

2. Case Report

A 72-year-old male with a history of previously treated blastic variant (Ki-67 60%–70%) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) presented to his outpatient oncology clinic with new complaints consisting of diffuse abdominal pain and distention, night sweats, fatigue, and a new mass within the umbilicus. The patient was noted to have a Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (MIPI) [11] of 6, primarily receiving a high risk score due to age >70 and an LDH which was 1.4 times the upper limit of normal. The patient’s performance status was limited only by weakness attributed to chronic narcotic use, but he was otherwise very functional at the time of presentation.

Recurrence was noted by PET scan to have occurred in areas of previous involvement, including several areas above the diaphragm, the retroperitoneum, and the right pelvis. However, abdominal examination revealed a new, nontender, violaceous mass projecting from the umbilicus (Figure 1). Computerized tomography of the chest, abdomen and pelvis confirmed the presence of the lesion within the umbilical cavity and also demonstrated an abdominal mass measuring 20.7 cm  ×  30 cm  ×  13 cm abutting the stomach against the diaphragm (Figure 2). This constellation of findings was thought to represent relapsed MCL and the protuberant abdominal mass consistent with the finding of a Sister Mary Joseph's (SMJ) nodule. The patient experienced multiple relapses after R-CHOP, single agent rituximab, bortezomib, and gemcitabine-carboplatin-dexamethsone-rituximab. Following this most recent relapse, he experienced a transient response to cyclophosphamide, etoposide, dexamethasone, and rituximab, but unfortunately expired 11 months later after further tumor progression.

3. Discussion

MCL is characterized by frequent extranodal involvement with a predilection to the aerodigestive tract, though ocular, central nervous system, breast, skin, and testicular involvement have been reported [1217]. Studies meant to characterize the frequency of spread to these sites are often limited by low case numbers and methodology of patient selection. Clinically significant gastrointestinal involvement has been historically reported in 15%–30% of cases [1821] although studies of random biopsy specimens from the GI tracts of untreated MCL patients suggest that this number may much higher [18, 22]. Central nervous system (CNS) infiltration has been described in anywhere of 2%–23% of MCL patients[15, 23, 24] and was associated with high tumor proliferative rate, blastic variant, and elevated lactate dehydrogenase [25]. Factors associated with other sites of extranodal disease beyond the gastrointestinal tract, bone marrow, and CNS are less well described but are also likely correlated with these same factors.

In general, MCL is characterized by lack of sustained responses to conventional therapies and poorer outcomes when compared to other lymphomas. While five-year survival after standard R-CHOP therapy was recently demonstrated to have improved from 22% to 47% [26], worse outcomes are associated with the presence of >1 entranodal site of disease [20, 27]. This case presentation illustrates both another unusual extranodal manifestation of MCL and the still grave prognosis of this entity emphasizing the need for more effective treatments.

Acknowledgments

Research Support: The Lymphoma Research Foundation Mantle Cell Lymphoma Research Initiative, The Mary A. wright memorial research fund, and a donation from Frank and Betty Vandermeer. AKG is a scholar in clinical research of the leukemia and lymphoma society.

References

  1. M. V. Barrow, “Metastatic tumours of the umbilicus,” Journal of Chronic Disease, vol. 19, pp. 1113–1117, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  2. D. Trebing and H.-D. Göring, “Die nabelmetastase. Sister Mary Joseph und ihre Zeit,” Der Hautarzt, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 186–189, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. A. Dubreuil, A. Dompmartin, P. Barjot, S. Louvet, and D. Leroy, “Umbilical metastasis or Sister Mary Joseph's nodule,” International Journal of Dermatology, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 7–13, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. F. C. Powell, A. J. Cooper, M. C. Massa et al., “Sister Mary Joseph's nodule: a clinical and histologic study,” Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 610–615, 1984. View at: Google Scholar
  5. V. G. Galvan, “Sister Mary Joseph's nodule,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 128, no. 5, p. 410, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  6. K. Nagao and A. Kikuchi, “Sister Joseph's node in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 335, no. 21, p. 1569, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. C. Tam, H. Turner, R. J. Hicks, and J. F. Seymour, “Diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma presenting as Sister Joseph's nodule,” Leukemia and Lymphoma, vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 2055–2057, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. A. Chagpar and J. W. Carter, “Lymphoma presenting as a Sister Mary Joseph's nodule,” American Surgeon, vol. 64, no. 8, pp. 799–800, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  9. M. C. Thomas and G. M. Jeffery, “Sister Joseph's nodule in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma,” Clinical Oncology, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 322–323, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  10. U. Handa, S. Garg, and H. Mohan, “Fine-needle aspiration cytology of Sister Mary Joseph's (Paraumbilical) nodules,” Diagnostic Cytopathology, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 348–350, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. E. Hoster, M. Dreyling, W. Klapper et al., “A new prognostic index (MIPI) for patients with advanced-stage mantle cell lymphoma,” Blood, vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 558–565, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. I. Sabnani, J. Varughese, R. Wascher, H. Youngworth, and P. Tsang, “Multiple synchronous unusual extranodal sites of relapse in a patient with mantle cell lymphoma,” Clinical Advances in Hematology and Oncology, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 797–802, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  13. E. Iwuanyanwu, L. J. Medeiros, J. E. Romaguera, and L. E. Fayad, “Mantle cell lymphoma with a rare involvement of the testicle,” Leukemia and Lymphoma, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1242–1243, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. A. Dean, T. E. Rogers, J. Diehl et al., “Extramedullary sites of involvement in hematologic malignancies: case 1. Multifocal intracranial involvement with mantle-cell lymphoma,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 340–342, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  15. R. Valdez, S. H. Kroft, C. W. Ross et al., “Cerebrospinal fluid involvement in mantle cell lymphoma,” Modern Pathology, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 1073–1079, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. J. A. Ferry, C. Y. Fung, L. Zukerberg et al., “Lymphoma of the ocular adnexa: a study of 353 cases,” American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 170–184, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. S.-I. Motegi, E. Okada, Y. Nagai, A. Tamura, and O. Ishikawa, “Skin manifestation of mantle cell lymphoma,” European Journal of Dermatology, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 435–438, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  18. J. E. Romaguera, L. J. Medeiros, F. B. Hagemeister et al., “Frequency of gastrointestinal involvement and its clinical significance in mantle cell lymphoma,” Cancer, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 586–591, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. A. J. Norton, J. Matthews, V. Pappa et al., “Mantle cell lymphoma: natural history defined in a serially biopsied population over a 20-year period,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 249–256, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  20. H. Samaha, C. Dumontet, N. Ketterer et al., “Mantle cell lymphoma: a retrospective study of 121 cases,” Leukemia, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 1281–1287, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  21. P. Meusers, J. Hense, and G. Brittinger, “Mantle cell lymphoma: diagnostic criteria, clinical aspects and therapeutic problems,” Leukemia, vol. 11, supplement 2, pp. s60–s64, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  22. A. Salar, N. Juanpere, B. Bellosillo et al., “Gastrointestinal involvement in mantle cell lymphoma: a prospective clinic, endoscopic, and pathologic study,” American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 1274–1280, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. R. Oinonen, K. Franssila, and E. Elonen, “Central nervous system involvement in patients with mantle cell lymphoma,” Annals of Hematology, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 145–149, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. E. Montserrat, F. Bosch, A. Lopez-Guillermo et al., “CNS involvement in mantle-cell lymphoma,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 941–944, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  25. A. Ferrer, F. Bosch, N. Villamor et al., “Central nervous system involvement in mantle cell lymphoma,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 135–141, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. A. Herrmann, E. Hoster, T. Zwingers et al., “Improvement of overall survival in advanced stage mantle cell lymphoma,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 511–518, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. B. T. Hennessy, E. O. Hanrahan, and P. A. Daly, “Non-Hodgkin lymphoma: an update,” The Lancet Oncology, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 341–353, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2010 Jennifer E. Vaughn and Ajay K. Gopal. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1024 Views | 294 Downloads | 4 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder