Case Reports in Medicine

Case Reports in Medicine / 2011 / Article

Case Report | Open Access

Volume 2011 |Article ID 645487 |

Giovanni Larciprete, Carlotta Montagnoli, Paolo Fusco, "Severe Fetal Distress and Umbilical Cord Strangulation", Case Reports in Medicine, vol. 2011, Article ID 645487, 3 pages, 2011.

Severe Fetal Distress and Umbilical Cord Strangulation

Academic Editor: R. Rabinowitz
Received17 May 2011
Accepted20 Jun 2011
Published18 Jul 2011


We describe an extreme case of amniotic band syndrome, presented with fetal stress during labor and associated with strangulation of umbilical cord.

1. Introduction

The amniotic band sequence is a rare syndrome which includes several congenital deformities, (usually at limbs or digits) caused by entrapment of these parts in fibrous amniotic bands [1]. The clinical manifestations vary from extremity amputations to anencephaly or fetal death secondary to strangulation of umbilical cord [2].

We report an extreme case of fetal distress associated with entrapment and strangulation of umbilical cord within an amniotic band, resulting in live born thanks to the careful evaluation of the parameters of fetal health in labor.

2. Case Presentation

On November the 9th, 2010, a 39-year-old women, gravida 2 para 1, at 41-week gestation, was admitted to our Department of Obstetric with decreased variability in fetal heart rate monitoring associated with oligohydramnios. The ultrasound scan performed at admission showed a vertex presenting fetus with an estimated weigth of 2800 g, reduced amniotic fluid index (AFI 40), and normal Doppler PI of umbilical artery. Her previous obstetrical and medical history was unremarkable, and her current pregnancy was ordinary.

Within 40 minutes of admission, an induction of labor with Oxytocin 5 UI was performed under cardiotocography monitoring. Two hours after the induction, we still observed a reduced variability in fetal heart rate from cardiotocography (amplitude range of 5 beats/minute) with sporadic late decelerations (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)), then we proceeded to amniorrhexis which revealed meconium-stained amniotic fluid. Therefore, a cesarean section was performed for acute fetal distress, since spontaneous vaginal delivery was not imminent. An asphyxiated, 2620 g female newborn was delivered, with Apgar score 2 and 8 at 1 and 5 minutes, respectively. The newborn had cardiac activity, but she breathed after ventilation. Unfortunately, we do not have any data about fetal or neonatal blood pH or BE, because in that circumstance, the blood sample clotted early before allowing the measure. The examination of the placenta and the umbilical cord revealed an amniotic band causing entrapment and strangulation of part of the umbilical cord (Figures 2(a) and 2(b)).

The newborn did not show other disorders due to amniotic band sequence. Both mother and neonate were discharged from hospital after 3 days without complications. The neonate was followed up and remained in good health after 1 year of delivery.

3. Discussion

The amniotic band sequence occurs in approximately 1/2000–1/15000 live births [2], but the presence of amniotic band is associated to 1%-2% of fetal malformations [3], and 10% of this congenital syndrome include umbilical cord strangulation [4].

Although the mechanism underlying the syndrome is unknown, however, the accepted hypothesis is that an early rupture of the amniotic sac leads to the formation of amniochorionic mesodermal bands [5]. The amniotic band determines clinical manifestations through entanglement by amniotic band, interference with normal development, and disruption secondary to cleavage of structure already developed normally [6]. However, these mechanisms are not able to explain all types of malformations.

Also, the type of deformities depends on time of amniotic rupture. It is assumed that the minor defect of extremities occur in late period, while an early amniotic rupture leads to the most severe visceral disruption, determining the different prognosis.

The prenatal diagnosis by ultrasound of the amniotic band is often difficult, and frequently the simultaneous presence of different congenital deformities suggests the presence of an amniotic band syndrome.

Unfortunately, in our case, the diagnosis of amniotic band was not determined during pregnancy. Only rare cases of strangulation of umbilical cord by amniotic band have been described in the literature, most of whom were stillborn [4, 7]. The cause of fetal death during labor is that the contraction intense enough to stop the blood flow through the umbilical cord constriction by amniotic band, determining severe fetal hypoxia [8].

Instead, we report a case of constricted umbilical cord by amniotic band, but fortunately, in this case, we intervened in time and despite the severe distress, the fetus was alive and actually is in good health.

Despite the fact that during labor the different unexpected umbilical cord lesions can occur, as we have already described in other reports [9, 10], this case suggests that the ultrasound diagnosis of amniotic band allows an attempted delivery and can explain signs of severe fetal distress at an early stage, leading the obstetricians to carefully evaluate the best route for a safe delivery.


  1. B. Poeuf, P. Samson, and G. Magalon, “Syndrome des brides amniotique,” Chirurgie de la Main, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. S136–S147, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. J. L. Merrimen, P. D. McNeely, R. L. Bendor-Samuel, M. H. Schmidt, and R. B. Fraser, “Congenital placental-cerebral adhesion: an unusual case of amniotic band sequence,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 104, no. 5, pp. 352–355, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  3. T. Marino, “Ultrasound abnormalities of the amniotic fluid, membranes, umbilical cord, and placenta,” Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 177–200, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. S. A. Heifetz, “Strangulation of the umbilical cord by amniotic bands: report of 6 cases and literature review,” Pediatric Pathology, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 285–304, 1984. View at: Google Scholar
  5. L. F. Goldfarb and N. H. Robin, “Amniotic constriction band: a multidisciplinary assessment of etiology and clinical presentation,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, vol. 91, supplement 4, pp. 68–75, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. C. Higginbottom, K. L. Jones, B. D. Hall, and D. W. Smith, “The amniotic band disruption complex: timing of amniotic rupture and variable spectra of consequent defects,” Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 544–549, 1979. View at: Google Scholar
  7. K. Chatzigeorgiou, T. Theodoridis, I. Efstratiou et al., “Strangulation of umbilical cord by amniotic band-a rare cause of intrauterine demise: a case report,” Cases Journal, vol. 2, no. 11, article 9108, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. S. Lurie, M. Feinstein, and Y. Mamet, “Umbilical cord strangulation by an amniotic band resulting in a stillbirth,” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 255–257, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. G. Larciprete and M. E. Romanini, “Umbilical cord segmental hemorrhage and fetal distress,” International Journal of Biomedical Science, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 184–186, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  10. G. Larciprete and G. di Pierro, “Absent and diastolic flow in umbilical artery and umbilical cord thrombosis at term of pregnancy,” Medical Science Monitor, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. CS29–CS33, 2003. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2011 Giovanni Larciprete et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.