Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Case Reports in Medicine
Volume 2012, Article ID 906924, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/906924
Case Report

Incidental Monotypic (Fat-Poor) Renal Angiomyolipoma Diagnosed by Core Needle Biopsy

1Department of Pathology, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
2Department of Radiology, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany

Received 12 December 2011; Accepted 6 February 2012

Academic Editor: Maxwell V. Meng

Copyright © 2012 Verena Kufer et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. W. H. Chow, S. S. Devesa, J. L. Warren, and J. F. Fraumeni Jr., “Rising incidence of renal cell cancer in the United States,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 281, no. 17, pp. 1628–1631, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. M. A. Bosniak, “The small (≤3.0 cm) renal parenchymal tumor: detection, diagnosis, and controversies,” Radiology, vol. 179, no. 2, pp. 307–317, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. L. R. Schachter, M. S. Cookson, S. S. Chang et al., “Second prize: frequency of benign renal cortical tumors and histologic subtypes based on size in a contemporary series: what to tell our patients,” Journal of Endourology, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 819–823, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. A. Kutikov, L. K. Fossett, P. Ramchandani et al., “Incidence of benign pathologic findings at partial nephrectomy for solitary renal mass presumed to be renal cell carcinoma on preoperative imaging,” Urology, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 737–740, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. H. L'Hostis, C. Deminiere, J. M. Ferriere, and J. M. Coindre, “Renal angiomyolipoma: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and follow-up study of 46 cases,” The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 1011–1020, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. B. R. Lane, H. Aydin, T. L. Danforth et al., “Clinical correlates of renal angiomyolipoma subtypes in 209 patients: classic, fat poor, tuberous sclerosis associated and epithelioid,” Journal of Urology, vol. 180, no. 3, pp. 836–843, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. G. Martignoni, M. Pea, P. C. Rocca, and F. Bonetti, “Renal pathology in the tuberous sclerosis complex,” Pathology, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 505–512, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. E. P. Henske, H. P. H. Neumann, B. W. Scheithauer, E. W. Herbst, M. P. Short, and D. J. Kwiatkowski, “Loss of heterozygosity in the tuberous sclerosis (TSC2) region of chromosome band 16p13 occurs in sporadic as well as TSC-associated renal angiomyolipomas,” Genes Chromosomes and Cancer, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 295–298, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. Milner, B. McNeil, J. Alioto et al., “Fat poor renal angiomyolipoma: patient, computerized tomography and histological findings,” Journal of Urology, vol. 176, no. 3, pp. 905–909, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. N. Nese, G. Martignoni, C. D. Fletcher et al., “Pure epithelioid PEComas (so-called epithelioid angiomyolipoma) of the kidney: a clinicopathologic study of 41 cases: detailed assessment of morphology and risk stratification,” The American Journal of Surgical Pathology, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 161–176, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. P. Serrano Frago, C. Del Agua Arias Camisón, M. Jesus Gil Sanz et al., “Controversies related to epithelioid variant of renal angiomyolipoma: a review of the literature,” Urology, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 846–e3, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. T. L. Danforth, B. R. Lane, and A. C. Novick, “Conservative management of giant symptomatic angiomyolipomas in patients with the tuberous sclerosis complex,” BJU International, vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 794–797, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. C. P. Nelson and M. G. Sanda, “Contemporary diagnosis and management of renal angiomyolipoma,” Journal of Urology, vol. 168, no. 4, pp. 1315–1325, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. G. Silverman, Y. U. Gan, K. J. Mortele, K. Tuncali, and E. S. Cibas, “Renal masses in the adult patient: the role of percutaneous biopsy,” Radiology, vol. 240, no. 1, pp. 6–22, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. Volpe, J. R. Kachura, W. R. Geddie et al., “Techniques, safety and accuracy of sampling of renal tumors by fine needle aspiration and core biopsy,” Journal of Urology, vol. 178, no. 2, pp. 379–386, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. F. J. Rybicki, K. M. Shu, E. S. Cibas, J. R. Fielding, E. VanSonnenberg, and S. G. Silverman, “Percutaneous biopsy of renal masses: sensitivity and negative predictive value stratified by clinical setting and size of masses,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 180, no. 5, pp. 1281–1287, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. V. A. Sahni and S. G. Silverman, “Biopsy of renal masses: when and why,” Cancer Imaging, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 44–55, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus