Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Case Reports in Medicine
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 827070, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/827070
Case Report

Management of Six Root Canals in Mandibular First Molar

1Department of Endodontics, University of Fortaleza (UNIFOR), 60811-905 Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
2Department of Endodontics, Federal University of Ceará (UFC), 62010-560 Sobral, CE, Brazil

Received 5 August 2014; Accepted 16 December 2014

Academic Editor: Roland Frankenberger

Copyright © 2015 Claudio Maniglia-Ferreira et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Success in root canal treatment is achieved after thorough cleaning, shaping, and obturation of the root canal system. This clinical case describes conventional root canal treatment of an unusual mandibular first molar with six root canals. The prognosis for endodontic treatment in teeth with abnormal morphology is unfavorable if the clinician fails to recognize extra root canals.

1. Introduction

The goal of root canal treatment is to clean the root canal system as thoroughly as possible and to fill it in all its dimensions to eliminate or at least reduce the microbial load in the canals [15]. Therefore, the details of unusual root canal morphology should be known to ensure successful root canal treatment [611]. The canals should be accurately located, cleaned, shaped, and obturated [1214].

Internal complexities of the root canal are genetically determined and described in many reports on root canal morphology of different populations [9, 1520]. Also, with ageing, secondary dentine deposition forms partitions and extensive differentiations of the root canal system, which result in separate canals and transverse connecting systems [21].

The mandibular first molar usually has three or four canals [22, 23]. The mesial root has two canals with an isthmus in between [18, 19, 22, 24]. This system may have an accessory mesial canal at a prevalence that ranges from 0% to 17% [25, 26]. Kottor et al. [11] and Ahmed et al. [18] found a prevalence rate of 4% and 3% for 3 canals in mesial and distal roots. Therefore, this occurrence in the same tooth is rare [27, 28].

When a preoperative radiograph reveals an atypical tooth shape and an unusual contour, further radiographs at different angles, if necessary, and cone-beam computed tomography scans should be taken to confirm any unusual anatomical features [29]. Apart from these presentations, a wide variation of root and canal configurations of the maxillary first molars has been documented in the dental literature. Case reports of mandibular first molars presenting with five or more root canals are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1: Case reports on mandibular first molar.

This clinical report describes the unusual morphology of a mandibular first molar with two roots and six root canals detected during routine root canal treatment.

2. Case Presentation

A 28-year-old man was referred for root canal treatment of his left mandibular first molar. The clinical diagnosis was necrotic pulp. History revealed pain during mastication. Neither fistulae nor edema was observed in the soft tissue. There was no pain or tenderness to palpation, tooth mobility was within physiological limits, and gingival attachment was normal. The tooth was tender to vertical percussion. Thermal pulp testing (Endo-Frost, Coltène-Whaledent, Langenau, Germany) elicited a negative response.

The tooth was anesthetized using the standard inferior alveolar nerve blocks with 1.8 mL of 4% articaine and 1 : 100.000 epinephrine (Articaine, DFL Ind e Com Ltda., Rio de Janeiro, Brazil). Pretreatment radiographs of the tooth showed a normal root canal anatomy and an apical lesion (Figure 1(a)). After placing a rubber dam and disinfecting the area with 2% chlorhexidine gluconate, conventional coronal access was performed. Initial examination with an endodontic explorer revealed that the pulp chamber had four orifices, two mesial and two distal (MB, ML, DB, and DL). Accurate inspection, after exploring and cleaning the grooves, showed that there were middle mesial and middle distal canals located between the root canals previously identified. The canals were negotiated using a number 10 K-file (Dentsply-Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland); an independent apical foramen was found. Irrigation was performed using 2.5% sodium hypochlorite solution (NaOCl) and 17% EDTA. Cleaning and shaping were performed using a reciprocation motion with the R25 Reciproc instrument (VDW, Munich, Germany) adapted to a Reciproc Silver motor (VDW, Munich, Germany).

Figure 1: Preoperative radiograph shows normal root canal anatomy and apical lesion (a); radiograph to determine working length (b); radiograph shows gutta-percha cones placed in canals (c); postobturation radiograph shows 6 root canals and independent apical foramina ((d) and (e)); clinical view of pulp chamber after root canal treatment (f); periapical repair 6 (g) and 18 months after treatment (h).

The canals were negotiated to the working length (WL), as indicated by an apex locator (Root ZX locator, J. Morita MFG Corp, Kyoto, Japan), with a size 10 K-type file, confirmed radiographically (Figure 1(b)). The Reciproc R25 instrument was introduced into the canal until resistance was felt and then activated in reciprocating motion. The instrument was moved in apical direction using an in-and-out pecking motion of about 3 mm in amplitude with a light apical pressure. After three pecking motions, the instrument was removed from the canal and cleaned. Next, a size 15 K-type file was taken to the WL to check whether the canal was patent. These procedures of Reciproc use followed by patency check with the size 15 K-type file were repeated until the WL was reached by the Reciproc instrument for all root canals. After preparation was complete, the canals were rinsed with 5 mL of 17% EDTA, followed by 10 mL of 2.5% NaOCl [8].

Obturation was performed using the continuous wave of condensation technique and gutta-percha points (Odous, Belo Horizonte, Brazil) and Grossman sealer (Endofill, Dentsply, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) (Figures 1(c), 1(d), and 1(e)). The conventional triangular access was modified to a trapezoidal shape to improve access to the additional canals (Figure 1(f)). The tooth received a permanent restoration, and the patient was seen six months later for follow-up. Clinical examination of the tooth was normal and the radiograph revealed decreased apical radiolucency (Figure 1(g)), despite the defective restoration present on coronal portion. Patient was referred for the placement of new crowns and during the 18-month follow-up, it can be noted that patient is under orthodontic treatment and complete healing of periapical lesion was achieved (Figure 1(h)).

3. Discussion

The main objective of root canal treatment is the thorough mechanical and chemical cleansing of the entire pulp cavity and its complete obturation with an inert filling material [11]. The most common reason for endodontic failure is infection that extends along the root canal system into the apical area [5]. Special attention should be paid to unfilled canal(s), because they are the least resistant path to leakage or reinfection [1, 15, 30].

Possible variations in the internal anatomy of human teeth should be known to ensure the success of endodontic treatment. The mandibular first molar usually has (i) a mesial root with 2 canals (94.4%); (ii) a third canal (middle mesial), at an incidence of 2.3%; (iii) a distal root with 1 (62.7%) or 2 (37.3%) canals [23].

Karapinar-Kazandag et al. [26] found that the prevalence of accessory mesial canals in the mesial root of mandibular molars is 18%; therefore, all negotiated accessory mesial canals were confluent with the main canals (MB or ML) and no canal ended in an independent apical foramen. Ryan et al. [27] reported a mandibular first molar with 3 separate mesial and 3 separate distal canals, but the distal root canals presented a single apical foramen. In our clinical case all the 6 canals had an independent apical foramen.

The recent development of technologies for endodontic treatment has focused largely on improving the quality of treatments [8, 26]. The introduction of apical locators, nickel-titanium (NiTi) mechanical instruments, operating microscopes, digital radiography, and cone-beam computed tomography greatly improved the ability to detect, clean, and shape root canals [15, 26, 29, 3133]. Despite the disadvantages of not using magnification and an operating microscope in this clinical case, the middle mesial and middle distal canals were found during accurate inspection of grooves and isthmus between the root canals identified initially without magnification [26].

Many canals can be shaped in just a few minutes, although they may not be cleaned [8, 34]. Susin et al. [34] demonstrated that one of the greatest challenges is cleaning and disinfecting the connections between canals and isthmuses. Failure to access, debride, and disinfect this complex anatomy might have a direct effect on treatment outcomes, particularly in cases such as the one described in this study, in which all canals had an independent apical foramen [23].

The expression “shaping and cleaning” is intended to emphasize that canals are generally shaped first and then cleaned if irrigation protocols are followed [8, 35]. Shaping is critical, not only for effective cleaning, but also for three-dimensional obturation [31]. The canals in our case were three-dimensionally obturated using the continuous wave of condensation technique and medium nonstandardized cones. Grossman sealer was used because it penetrates into dentinal tubules well and serves as filler for root canal irregularities and for minor discrepancies between the root canal wall and core filling material [1]. It may also contribute to control microbial infection should there be microorganisms left on the canal walls or in the tubules [36]. The treatment was performed in a single session due to absence of clinical signs and symptoms of acute apical inflammation (pain, swelling, and apical exudate) [37].

From a clinical standpoint, radiographs or other imaging resources provide clinicians with the most appropriate method to detect variations in both root and canal anatomy. However, only by correct clinical examination and interpretation of these images can the clinician detect variations and be aware of them before and during endodontic procedures [32, 38]. Clearly, third mesial and distal canals in mandibular molars should be investigated and identified when planning root canal therapy [30, 39, 40]. The mesial and distal grooves of mandibular molars should be explored and cleaned. This might aid in the detection of a possible middle canal.

4. Conclusion

This clinical case report describes the endodontic treatment of a mandibular first molar with 6 root canals. Mandibular first molars with six root canals are rare, but each case should be carefully investigated clinically and radiographically to detect any anatomic anomalies. Possible variations in the internal anatomy of human teeth should be known to ensure successful endodontic treatment. Also, accessory canals in mandibular molars should be detected and negotiated to provide access for irrigation and filling materials into otherwise inaccessible isthmus.

Conflict of Interests

No potential conflict of interests was disclosed.

References

  1. G. A. de Deus, F. Martins, A. C. M. R. Lima, E. D. Gurgel-Filho, C. F. Maniglia, and T. Coutinho-Filho, “Analysis of the film thickness of a root canal sealer following three obturation techniques,” Pesquisa Odontológica Brasileira, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 119–125, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. Ricucci and J. F. Siqueira Jr., “Anatomic and microbiologic challenges to achieving success with endodontic treatment: a case report,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 1249–1254, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  3. U. Sjögren, D. Figdor, S. Persson, and G. Sundqvist, “Influence of infection at the time of root filling on the outcome of endodontic treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 297–306, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. F. Siqueira Jr., “Aetiology of root canal treatment failure: why well-treated teeth can fail,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. F. Siqueira Jr. and I. N. Rôças, “Clinical Implications and microbiology of bacterial persistence after treatment procedures,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 34, no. 11, pp. 1291.e3–1301.e3, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  6. C. M. Ferreira, I. G. de Moraes, and N. Bernardineli, “Three-rooted maxillary second premolar,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 105–106, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  7. F. Maggiore, Y. T. Jou, and S. Kim, “A six-canal maxillary first molar: case report,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 486–491, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. F. R. F. Alves, I. N. Rôças, B. M. Almeida, M. A. S. Neves, J. Zoffoli, and J. F. Siqueira, “Quantitative molecular and culture analyses of bacterial elimination in oval-shaped root canals by a single-file instrumentation technique,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 871–877, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  9. E. Schäfer, D. Breuer, and S. Janzen, “The prevalence of three-rooted mandibular permanent first molars in a German population,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 202–205, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  10. O. V. de Pablo, R. Estevez, C. Heilborn, and N. Cohenca, “Root anatomy and canal configuration of the permanent mandibular first molar: clinical implications and recommendations,” Quintessence International, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 15–27, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. Kottor, K. K. Paul, J. Mathew, S. George, and A. Roy, “A permanent mandibular second molar with seven root canal systems,” Quintessence International, vol. 45, pp. 381–383, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  12. D. Ricucci, “Three independent canals in the mesial root of a mandibular first molar,” Endodontics and Dental Traumatology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 47–49, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. F. B. Barletta, S. R. Dotto, M. D. S. Reis, R. Ferreira, and R. M. C. Travassos, “Mandibular molar with five root canals,” Australian Endodontic Journal, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 129–132, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  14. S. S. Chandra, M. Rajasekaran, P. Shankar, and R. Indira, “Endodontic management of a mandibular first molar with three distal canals confirmed with the aid of spiral computerized tomography: a case report,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology, vol. 108, no. 4, pp. e77–e81, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  15. P. Neelakantan, C. Subbarao, and C. V. Subbarao, “Comparative evaluation of modified canal staining and clearing technique, cone-beam computed tomography, peripheral quantitative computed tomography, spiral computed tomography, and plain and contrast medium-enhanced digital radiography in studying root canal morphology,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 36, no. 9, pp. 1547–1551, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  16. J. J. Segura-Egea, O. Alonso-Ezpeleta, J. Martín-González, and M. Martín-Jiménez, “Endodontic treatment failure consecutive to unsystematic radiographic examination,” Oral Health and Dental Management, vol. 12, pp. 300–304, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  17. S. Sert, V. Aslanalp, and J. Tanalp, “Investigation of the root canal configurations of mandibular permanent teeth in the Turkish population,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 494–499, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  18. H. A. Ahmed, N. H. Abu-Bakr, N. A. Yahia, and Y. E. Ibrahim, “Root and canal morphology of permanent mandibular molars in a Sudanese population,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 766–771, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  19. A. A. Al-Qudah and L. A. Awawdeh, “Root and canal morphology of mandibular first and second molar teeth in a jordanian population,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 775–784, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  20. R.-Y. Huang, W.-C. Cheng, C.-J. Chen et al., “Three-dimensional analysis of the root morphology of mandibular first molars with distolingual roots,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 478–484, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  21. H. R. D. Peiris, T. N. Pitakotuwage, M. Takahashi, K. Sasaki, and E. Kanazawa, “Root canal morphology of mandibular permanent molars at different ages,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 828–835, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  22. F. J. Vertucci, “Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth,” Oral Surgery Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 589–599, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. Ó. V. de Pablo, R. Estevez, M. Péix Sánchez, C. Heilborn, and N. Cohenca, “Root anatomy and canal configuration of the permanent mandibular first molar: a systematic review,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 36, no. 12, pp. 1919–1931, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  24. F. Pineda and Y. Kuttler, “Mesiodistal and buccolingual roentgenographic investigation of 7,275 root canals,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 101–110, 1972. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. H. H. Pomeranz, D. L. Eidelman, and M. G. Goldberg, “Treatment considerations of the middle mesial canal of mandibular first and second molars,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 565–568, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. M. Karapinar-Kazandag, B. R. Basrani, and S. Friedman, “The operating microscope enhances detection and negotiation of accessory mesial canals in mandibular molars,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 1289–1294, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  27. J. L. Ryan, W. R. Bowles, M. K. Baisden, and S. B. McClanahan, “Mandibular first molar with six separate canals,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 878–880, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  28. A. Subbiya, K. S. Kumar, P. Vivekanandhan, and V. Prakash, “Management of mandibular first molar with four canals in mesial root,” Journal of Conservative Dentistry, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 471–473, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  29. F. de Almeida-Gomes, C. Maniglia-Ferreira, B. Carvalho-Susa, and R. A. dos Santos, “Six root canals in maxillary first molar,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. e157–e159, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  30. C. Yesilsoy, O. Porras, and W. Gordon, “Importance of third mesial canals in mandibular molars: report of 2 cases,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. e55–e58, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  31. C. Maniglia-Ferreira, F. de Almeida-Gomes, B. C. de Sousa, C. C. Dos Santos Acioli Lins, and R. A. Dos Santos, “A case of unusual anatomy in second mandibular molar with four canals,” European Journal of Dentistry, vol. 2, pp. 217–219, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  32. J. Krithikadatta, J. Kottoor, C. S. Karumaran, and G. Rajan, “Mandibular first molar having an unusual mesial root canal morphology with contradictory cone-beam computed tomography findings: a case report,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 1712–1716, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  33. S. Demirbuga, A.-E. Sekerci, A.-N. Dinçer, M. Cayabatmaz, and Y.-O. Zorba, “Use of cone-beam computed tomography to evaluate root and canal morphology of mandibular first and second molars in Turkish individuals,” Medicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. e737–e744, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. L. Susin, Y. Liu, J. C. Yoon et al., “Canal and isthmus debridement efficacies of two irrigant agitation techniques in a closed system,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 43, no. 12, pp. 1077–1090, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  35. M. Zehnder, “Root Canal Irrigants,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 389–398, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  36. N. Vivacqua-Gomes, E. D. Gurgel-Filho, B. P. F. A. Gomes, C. C. R. Ferraz, A. A. Zaia, and F. J. Souza-Filho, “Recovery of Enterococcus faecalis after single- or multiple-visit root canal treatments carried out in infected teeth ex vivo,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 697–704, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  37. C. H. Fleming, M. S. Litaker, L. W. Alley, and P. D. Eleazer, “Comparison of classic endodontic techniques versus contemporary techniques on endodontic treatment success,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 414–418, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  38. S.-J. Lee, K.-H. Jang, L. S. W. Spangberg et al., “Three-dimensional visualization of a mandibular first molar with three distal roots using computer-aided rapid prototyping,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontology, vol. 101, no. 5, pp. 668–674, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  39. E. S. Reeh, “Seven canals in a lower first molar,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 497–499, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. A. Martínez-Berná and P. Badanelli, “Mandibular first molars with six root canals,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 348–352, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. J. Kottoor, R. Sudha, and N. Velmurugan, “Middle distal canal of the mandibular first molar: a case report and literature review,” International Endodontic Journal, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 714–722, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus