Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Case Reports in Medicine
Volume 2016, Article ID 4732153, 3 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4732153
Case Report

Surgical Removal of an Extrauterine Device Migrating to Appendix

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Adana Numune Education and Research Hospital, Adana, Turkey

Received 30 July 2016; Revised 12 October 2016; Accepted 16 October 2016

Academic Editor: Jagdish Butany

Copyright © 2016 Gulsum Uysal et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. E. Caliskan, N. Öztürk, B. Ö. Dilbaz, and S. Dilbaz, “Analysis of risk factors associated with uterine perforation by intrauterine devices,” European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 150–155, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. Zakin, W. Z. Stern, and R. Rosenblatt, “Complete and partial uterine perforation and embedding following insertion of intrauterine devices,” Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 335–353, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. J. Kaislasuo, S. Suhonen, M. Gissler, P. Lähteenmäki, and O. Heikinheimo, “Uterine perforation caused by intrauterine devices: clinical course and treatment,” Human Reproduction, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1546–1551, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. T. C. Key and A. K. Kreutner, “Gastrointestinal complications of modern intrauterine devices,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 239–243, 1980. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. Demirci, O. Ekmekcioglu, A. Demirtas, and I. Gulmez, “Big bladder stones around an intravesical migrated intrauterine device,” International Urology and Nephrology, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 495–496, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. Kriplani, P. Garg, M. Sharma, and N. Agarwal, “Laparoscopic removal of extrauterine IUCD using fluoroscopy guidance: a case report,” Journal of Gynecologic Surgery, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 29–30, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. E. Ohana, E. Sheiner, E. Leron, and M. Mazor, “Appendix perforation by an intrauterine contraceptive device,” European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 129–131, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. V. Johri and K. C. Vyas, “Misplaced intrauterine contraceptive devices: common errors; uncommon complications,” Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 905–907, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. Kaplanoğlu, M. Bülbül, T. Yüce, D. Kaplanoğlu, and M. Aban, “Mislocated extrauterine intrauterine devices: diagnosis and surgical management,” Journal of the Turkish German Gynecology Association, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 91–95, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, WHO Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 5th edition, 2015.
  11. M. T. Ozgun, C. Batukan, I. S. Serin, B. Ozcelik, M. Basbug, and M. Dolanbay, “Surgical management of intra-abdominal mislocated intrauterine devices,” Contraception, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 96–100, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus