Case Reports in Medicine

Case Reports in Medicine / 2018 / Article

Case Report | Open Access

Volume 2018 |Article ID 2840707 |

Ali Amanati, Nader Shakibazad, Bahman Pourabbas, Mohammad Hossein Nowroozzadeh, Soheila Zareifar, Omid Reza Zekavat, "Acute Progressive Visual Loss in a Case of Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Challenges in the Utility of Molecular Tests in Early Diagnose of Cytomegalovirus Retinitis", Case Reports in Medicine, vol. 2018, Article ID 2840707, 4 pages, 2018.

Acute Progressive Visual Loss in a Case of Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Challenges in the Utility of Molecular Tests in Early Diagnose of Cytomegalovirus Retinitis

Academic Editor: Thomas R. Chauncey
Received16 Oct 2017
Revised27 Dec 2017
Accepted02 Jan 2018
Published31 Jan 2018


Cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis is one of the rare but debilitating presentations of the CMV infection in children with leukemia. Herein, we report a 12-year-old boy with acute myeloid leukemia complicated by rapid progressive visual loss during relapse of leukemia. The definite diagnosis of CMV retinitis was made after vitreous aspiration. Despite prompt treatment and ophthalmologic intervention, he died because of AML relapse. Viral infections, especially cytomegalovirus infection, may present with vague clinical pictures during any time of chemotherapy, which may not be easily distinguishable from bacterial or fungal retinitis and also chemotherapy-induced retinopathies. Clinician should consider CMV retinitis in seropositive patients especially those without detectable viremia.

1. Introduction

Although the true incidence of CMV retinitis in non-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) population such as leukemia is unknown [1, 2], but its occurrence is considered very rare especially in those with pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in the nontransplant setting [3]. The reported predisposing risk factors for CMV retinitis are older age, leukemia, systemic autoimmune disease, organ transplantation, lymphoma, diabetes mellitus, Good syndrome, immunosuppressive therapy, and multiple myeloma [3].

Sight-threatening emergencies may occur in any time during chemotherapy. Severe ophthalmic involvement, such as acute retinal necrosis (ARN) and progressive outer retinal necrosis (PORN), needs timely diagnose and prompt treatment. These are makeup of different etiologies, including infectious and noninfectious causes [47]. Chemotherapy-related ocular toxicity is one of the noninfectious etiologies of retinopathy in cancer patients [8, 9]. Certain antimicrobial agents such as voriconazole also may be accompanied with various degrees of ocular toxicity especially in whom without therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) [1012]. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is also one of the important causes of acute visual loss during chemotherapy [13].

Prompt and regular ophthalmologic evaluation could guide empiric treatment, but in certain situations other diagnostic modalities help clinicians to make definite diagnosis. Herein, we report a case of relapsed AML on intensive chemotherapy, presented with acute visual loss, discuss the differential diagnosis, and describe the treatment choices.

2. Case Presentation

A 12-year-old boy a known case of relapsed AML has been admitted with impression of febrile neutropenia after the last course of chemotherapy on 16 April 2016. He received the FLAI regimen including fludarabine, cytarabine, and idarubicin (FLAI). After full sepsis workup, meropenem was started and cotrimoxazole (TMP/SMX) was continued with prophylaxis dosage (200 mg/12 hours by oral route). He received voriconazole as a fungal prophylaxis because of the previous history of proven pulmonary aspergillosis. Total white blood cell count was 200/mm3 (without countable neutrophils), hemoglobin was 10 g/dl, and platelet was 6000/mm3. First blood culture was positive for viridans streptococcus (by BACTEC system, time to detection: 9 hours) which was sensitive to vancomycin. Because high-grade fever continued after 48 hours of treatment and according to blood culture results, systemic vancomycin was added to antibacterial medications. The patient developed acute visual loss on 6th day of admission despite the appropriate type and dose of antibiotics. The neurological exam was normal. Retinal detachment and cancer associated retinopathy have been suggested as differential diagnoses in the first general ophthalmologist examination. The therapeutic dose of liposomal amphotericin B has been replaced with voriconazole.

Because high-grade fever was not resolved in 8th day of therapy (24 April), the blood sample was sent for a new culture, polymerase chain reaction (PCR; for aspergillosis, mucormycosis, candida, CMV, and tuberculosis), and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELIZA; for toxoplasmosis and cytomegalovirus antibody assay). A new chest X-ray has also been requested which revealed no new findings.

According to the results, toxoplasmosis IgM level was negative (0.1 IU/ml) and IgG level was at a borderline level (9.8 IU/ml). CMV blood PCR was reported to be 950  copy/mL. Anti-CMV antibody (IgG) was positive. Repeated blood PCR was negative for other fungal or viral pathogens.

Due to poor patient condition, spiral chest CT scan was requested on 10th day of admission with normal result. Rifampin has been added to the treatment regimen due to deteriorating patient’s condition to achieve additive anti-Gram-positive synergistic effect. As the new blood culture results again revealed viridans streptococcus, which is susceptible to linezolid, linezolid has thus been replaced with vancomycin because of persistent bacteremia on 12th day of admission.

Lumbar puncture was performed on 29 April with total cells of 50/mm3 (white blood cells, 40/mm3 (polymorphonuclear leukocytes, 40%); red blood cells, 10/mm3), glucose of 50 mg/dl, protein of 48 mg/dl, and lactate dehydrogenase of 40 IU/L. Cytology report of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was positive for blasts, and PCR was negative for all viral and fungal suspicious agents.

Along with the patient’s general condition, the patient complained of deteriorated visual function in the right eye. Therefore, a second ophthalmologist consult with a vitreoretinal specialist has been performed on 16th day of admission. The consultant ophthalmologist reported fluffy lesions with diffuse retinal hemorrhage and patchy focal necrosis (brush fire pattern) in the right eye and normal left eye (Figure 1). Thus, with first impression of cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis, vitreous aspiration was performed under anesthesia, and the sample was sent to the laboratory for PCR analysis. DNA was extracted from 100 µL ocular fluid by using High Pure Viral Nucleic Acid Kit (Roche Diagnostic GmbH, Germany) according to the instruction manual. Cytomegalovirus viral load was determined using a genesig quantitative real-time PCR kit (Primer Design Ltd. TM, Advanced Kit, United Kingdom) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. The target sequence (glycoprotein B) has previously been shown to be a good genetic marker for CMV in other real-time PCR-based studies [14]. This quantitative PCR assay was sensitive enough to detect 10 copies of CMV genomic DNA. Real-time PCR was performed using an ABI Step One Plus System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) with standard reagents (TaqMan Gene Expression Master Mix, Applied Biosystems, UK), which showed positive results for CMV (5000 copy/ml). Upon confirmation, the patient received 2 intravitreal injections of ganciclovir 1 week apart with adjunctive systemic antiviral therapy with ganciclovir 5 mg/kg twice daily on 24th day of admission for 2 weeks as induction. In addition, our plan was to continue for about 4 weeks.

On 34th day after admission, a new blood sample was requested for CMV PCR, which was shown 1150 copy/ml of CMV DNA in plasma without significant change in baseline CMV viral load.

Because of severe retinal necrosis and hole formation at some retinal areas, barrier argon laser photocoagulation was suggested and performed by the responsible ophthalmologist. The final blood culture became negative, but finally he was died due to refractoriness of leukemia and poor response to chemotherapy 8 weeks after admission.

3. Discussion

Chemotherapy-related retinopathy, retinal hemorrhage due to bleeding tendency, drug toxicity (voriconazole overdose), and infectious retinitis (viral, bacterial, or fungal) are among the most common causes of the sudden onset visual loss in a child with leukemia.

The most common side effect (30%) of oral and intravenous voriconazole administration is photopsia, or visual disturbances (patients describe increased brightness or blurred vision) that are transient and reversible. Moreover, color blindness and night blindness have been reported [15]. Rarely, sudden blindness is reported as a severe side effect of intravenous voriconazole therapy (but not oral formulation). It should be mentioned that our patient was received oral voriconazole [16].

Although CMV retinitis is less common than other etiologic causes of acute visual loss in acute leukemia [1719], high level of suspicion, timely diagnosis, and prompt treatment could prevent permanent visual loss [19].

Currently, there is consensus regarding withholding ganciclovir in severely neutropenic patients, but ganciclovir still is the drug of choice in management of CMV infections including CMV retinitis [20]. It seems reasonable to treat the patient when CMV is the main etiologic cause of acute visual loss. Topical and systemic ganciclovir could save vision specially when considerable viremia is present (3- to 5-fold increase in the baseline CMV viral load or in case of CMV viral load of more than 2000 copy/ml) [21]. It should also be kept in mind that systemic CMV infection itself may exaggerate duration and depth of neutropenia by secondary bone marrow suppression [22, 23]. The risk of treatment with ganciclovir should be weighed against the benefits in such a situation. Although available data have been confirmed direct association between high CMV viral load and development of CMV retinitis in patients with CMV viremia after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) [24], there is lack of enough evidence to support this relationship in leukemia. Based on small case series, nearly all reported cases had viremia at the time of diagnosis [19]. Antiviral therapy usually is continued for 4–6 weeks.

As evident in our case, relying only on CMV viral load in the blood may postpone correct diagnose of CMV retinitis and delay timely antiviral treatment. Finally, it is necessary to emphasize that the diagnosis of CMV retinitis was made on the basis of ophthalmological findings suggesting typical diffuse retinal hemorrhage and patchy focal necrosis.

4. Conclusion

Although bacterial infections are the main cause of infectious complications in children with leukemia, leukemic patients are at increased risk of other opportunistic infections during the course of chemotherapy, such as invasive fungal and viral infections. Viral infections, especially cytomegalovirus, may present by vague clinical picture, which may not be distinguishable easily.

Clinician who involves in the management of patients with leukemia should be aware of these rare complications.


The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest.


  1. Y. L. Ian, K. M. D. Yeung, E. Cunningham, and N. Sen, “CMV retinitis: reduced incidence, still a threat,” Review of ophthalmology, vol. 23, no. 5, p. 58, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  2. A. Benova, M. Brichova, P. Svozilkova et al., “Cytomegalovirus retinitis in HIV negative patients-retrospective study,” Ceská a Slovenská Oftalmologie, vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 227–234, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  3. K. M. Downes, D. Tarasewicz, L. J. Weisberg, and E. T. Cunningham, “Good syndrome and other causes of cytomegalovirus retinitis in HIV-negative patients—case report and comprehensive review of the literature,” Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 3, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. B. Balansard, B. Bodaghi, N. Cassoux et al., “Necrotising retinopathies simulating acute retinal necrosis syndrome,” British Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 96–101, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. R. E. Engstrom, G. N. Holland, T. P. Margolis et al., “The progressive outer retinal necrosis syndrome. A variant of necrotizing herpetic retinopathy in patients with AIDS,” Ophthalmology, vol. 101, no. 9, pp. 1488–1502, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. J. B. Ganatra, D. Chandler, C. Santos, B. Kuppermann, and T. P. Margolis, “Viral causes of the acute retinal necrosis syndrome,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 129, no. 2, pp. 166–172, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. M. H. Wong, G. C. Cheung, and S. P. Chee, “Posterior segment findings of ocular cytomegalovirus infection in immunocompetent patients,” Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, vol. 252, no. 11, pp. 1811–1816, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. T. al-Tweigeri, J. M. Nabholtz, and J. R. Mackey, “Ocular toxicity and cancer chemotherapy. A review,” Cancer, vol. 78, no. 7, pp. 1359–1373, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. A. E. Omoti and C. E. Omoti, “Ocular toxicity of systemic anticancer chemotherapy,” Pharmacy Practice (Granada), vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 55–59, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. E. Ashley, R. Lewis, J. Lewis, C. Martin, and D. Andes, “Pharmacology of systemic antifungal agents,” Clinical infectious diseases, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 28–39, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. B. A. Cunha, “Antibiotic side effects,” Medical Clinics of North America, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 149–185, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. S. D. Jaanus, “Ocular side effects of selected systemic drugs,” Optometry Clinics, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 73–96, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  13. J. H. Pula and E. Eggenberger, “Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome,” Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 479–484, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. Guiver, A. J. Fox, K. Mutton, N. Mogulkoc, and J. Egan, “Evaluation of CMV viral load using TaqMan CMV quantitative PCR and comparison with CMV antigenemia in heart and lung transplant recipients,” Transplantation, vol. 71, no. 11, pp. 1609–1615, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. A. Lat and G. R. Thompson III, “Update on the optimal use of voriconazole for invasive fungal infections,” Infection and Drug Resistance, vol. 4, p. 43, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. “Voriconazole vial side effects,” 2017, View at: Google Scholar
  17. S. Demir, H. Çeliker, A. Karaaslan et al., “Cytomegalovirus retinitis in three pediatric cases with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: case series and review of the literature,” Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 534–538, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. B. Orhan, B. Malbora, S. Akça Bayar, Z. Avcı, B. Alioğlu, and N. Özbek, “Ophthalmologic findings in children with leukemia: a single-center study,” Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 62–67, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. A. Rahbarimanesh, M. Ehsani, M. Karahroudi et al., “Cytomegalovirus disease in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the nontransplant setting: case series and review of the literature,” Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 429–432, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. K. K. Biron, “Antiviral drugs for cytomegalovirus diseases,” Antiviral Research, vol. 71, no. 2-3, pp. 154–163, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. C. S. Kraft, W. S. Armstrong, and A. M. Caliendo, “Interpreting quantitative cytomegalovirus DNA testing: understanding the laboratory perspective,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 54, no. 12, pp. 1793–1797, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. Y. Hirayama, S. Sakamaki, Y. Tsuji et al., “Recovery of neutrophil count by ganciclovir in patients with chronic idiopathic neutropenia associated with cytomegalovirus infection in bone marrow stromal cells,” International Journal of Hematology, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 337–339, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. W. D. Roberts, K. I. Weinberg, D. B. Kohn, L. Sender, R. Parkman, and C. Lenarsky, “Granulocyte recovery in pediatric marrow transplant recipients treated with ganciclovir for cytomegalovirus infection,” American Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 320–323, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  24. S. Jeon, W. K. Lee, Y. Lee, D. G. Lee, and J. W. Lee, “Risk factors for cytomegalovirus retinitis in patients with cytomegalovirus viremia after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation,” Ophthalmology, vol. 119, no. 9, pp. 1892–1898, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2018 Ali Amanati et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.