A Report on a Family with TMTC3-Related Syndrome and Review
Recessive mutations in the TMTC3 gene have been reported in thirteen patients to date exhibiting development delay, intellectual disability (ID), seizures, and muscular hypotonia, accompanied occasionally by neuronal migration defects expressed as either cobblestone lissencephaly or periventricular hypertopia. Here, we report a new case of a TMTC3-related syndrome in a Lebanese family with two affected siblings showing severe psychomotor retardation, intellectual disability, microcephaly, absence of speech, muscular hypotonia, and seizures. Whole exome sequencing revealed a homozygous pathogenic variant c.211 C > T (p.R71C) in the TMTC3 gene in both siblings. A review of the literature on TMTC3-related syndrome and its causal mutations is provided.
The protein O-mannosyl-transferase TMTC3 belongs to a family of four recently discovered ER transmembrane O-mannosyl-transferases, each of which is characterized by the presence of four tetratricopeptide repeats. Recent studies have shown that this protein is involved in the O-mannosylation of cadherins and protocadherins, thereby affecting cellular adhesion . In addition, there is some evidence to support the role of TMTC3 in modulating the ER stress response .
Recessive mutations in the TMTC3 gene have been reported in thirteen patients to date exhibiting development delay, intellectual disability (ID), seizures, and muscular hypotonia [3, 4]. Many of these patients show a phenotype which is accompanied by neuronal migration defects expressed as either cobblestone lissencephaly or periventricular hypertopia.
In this study, we report a Lebanese family with TMTC3-related syndrome with two siblings showing severe psychomotor delay, intellectual disability, microcephaly, absence of speech, muscular hypotonia, generalized seizures, and carrying a homozygous pathogenic variant in the TMTC3 gene. We also provide a review of the literature of patients with causal mutations in this gene.
2. Materials and Methods
The proband and her sister, from healthy, first-cousin parents, were seen in our clinic in Beirut, Lebanon. They underwent an extensive workup including a thorough clinical evaluation, total body X-rays, echocardiography, karyotype, routine blood tests, and molecular analysis.
2.1. DNA Isolation
Informed consent for genetic analysis was obtained from the family in compliance with national ethics regulation. Genomic DNA for the two sisters and their parents was isolated from blood samples using standard techniques.
2.2. Exome Sequencing
Shotgun libraries were generated from 1 μg of genomic DNA (gDNA). For each sample, gDNA was sheared to 150–200 bp using Covaris E220 instrument (Covaris, Inc.) under the following conditions: 50 μl total volume, 10% duty cycle, 175 as intensity, 200 cycles per burst, and 360 seconds in the frequency sweeping mode.
The rest of the library preparation followed the manufacturer’s instructions as described in the SureSelectXT2 Library Prep Kit (Agilent Technologies, Inc.). In brief, the sheared DNA was end-repaired and A-tailed to generate blunt ends and then ligated to Illumina compatible indexed adaptors; finally, the adaptor-ligated DNA fragments were PCR-enriched. The quality and quantity of each library were assessed with the 2100 Bioanalyzer DNA 1000 Assay (Agilent Technologies, Inc.), to confirm a distribution with an average DNA fragment size of approximately 250 to 275 bp. Equal amounts of each indexed whole genome library were pooled to make 1500 ng in 7 μl. The pooled libraries were hybridized to SureSelect Human All-Exon V6 (Agilent Technologies, Inc.), following manufacturer’s instructions. Then, the SureSelect-enriched indexed library DNA pool was PCR-amplified. Finally, the amplified captured libraries were purified using Agencourt AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter, Inc.). The quality of the library was assessed with the 2100 Bioanalyzer High Sensitivity DNA assay (Agilent Technologies, Inc.). Captured libraries were sequenced on a single lane on the Illumina HiSeq4000 in a paired-end 150 bp run following the manufacturer’s instructions and using the standard sequencing primer.
2.3. Bioinformatic Analysis
The captured libraries were sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq4000 Analyzer following the manufacturer’s instructions (Illumina, San Diego, USA). The reads were mapped to human genome reference (hg19) using Burrows–Wheeler Aligner (http://bio-bwa.sourceforge.net/). Single-nucleotide variants and indels were called with GATK 3.8, SAMtools (http://samtools.sourceforge.net/), and Picard (http://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/). All single-nucleotide variants and indels were filtered via multiple databases. Pathogenic variants were assessed under the protocol issued by the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics .
3.1. Case Report
The proband (Figure 1(a), II.I) was born at term after a normal pregnancy with generalized hypotonia, a head circumference (OFC) of 33 cm (25th centile); a weight of 1800 g (3rd centile); and a length of 48 cm (35th centile). She had a delay in developmental milestones as she sat at age 2 and started to walk at age 3.
At the age of 5 years, her parents started to note episodic crises, mainly nocturnal, consisting of abnormal breathing and generalized stiffening and contraction of the limbs. Different treatment regimens were initiated, until she was more or less stabilized under Depakine and Rivotril.
She presented to the clinic at the age of 14 years (Figure 1(c)). She had severe psychomotor delay which was speechless and could understand simple orders. She was moving continuously, had a tip-toe walk, had stereotypic hand movements, and hit herself from time to time. Her OFC was 50.8 cm (<3rd centile), her height was 143 cm (<3rd centile), and her weight was 33 kg (<3rd centile). Upon examination, she had no dysmorphic facial features. A single palmar crease was noted on the right hand. She showed muscular hypotonia and had no osteotendinous reflexes. She had a delay in puberty as breasts had just started to grow, and she still had an absence of menses. Cardiac and ophthalmological examination, as well as brainstem auditory evoked response, was normal. Brain MRI showed the presence of an Arnold-Chiari type 1 malformation (Table 1).
Her younger sister (Figure 1(a), II.II) was born 7 years later after a normal pregnancy. At birth, OFC was 33.2 cm (25th centile); weight was 2410 g (5th centile); and length was 47 cm (25th centile). According to the parents, she had the same clinical course as of her affected sister. Nocturnal episodes of seizures appeared at age 3.5 years and were controlled by Convulex and Lovipram.
She was seen at the age of 8 years (Figure 1(c)). Her OFC was 49.7 cm (5th centile), height was 123 cm (50th centile), and weight was 17 kg (<3rd centile). She had severe psychomotor delay and displayed autistic behaviour. She was hypotonic, still could not walk alone, and, when helped, had a severe ataxia. However, in her case, she had a divergent strabismus, a hypodontia, a left single palmar crease, and no cardiac abnormalities (Table 1). MRI was performed but did not reveal any remarkable findings.
For both sisters, results of routine blood analyses and karyotype were all unremarkable.
3.2. Molecular Analysis
Whole exome sequencing (WES) revealed the presence of a homozygous pathogenic variant c.211C >T (p.R71C) in the TMTC3 gene in both affected sisters. The parents were both found to be heterozygous for this variant. The presence of this variant was confirmed by Sanger analysis (Figure 2(b)). This variant introduces a missense mutation, which is predicted to be a damaging mutation altering the structure of the protein and its biological role. The variant was not found in the 1000 Genomes Project (http://www.1000genomes.org/home) or the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS/), but it was found in dbSNP (rs758540759) and the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD; https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/). In the latter, the variant was extremely rare, being detected in only two out of 280532 individuals; both of whom were heterozygous. The CADD score of 32 indicates the variant is within the top 0.1% deleterious variants in the human genome . SIFT function prediction was damaging, while PolyPhen-2 function prediction was probably damaging. To determine amino acid conservation, human protein sequences were aligned to the other protein sequences from a dispersed set of species using ClustalW , highlighting the conservation at the residue affected in the siblings reported here (Figure 2(a)).
Here, we report a Lebanese family with two siblings affected with severe psychomotor retardation, ID, and muscular hypotonia, with homozygous mutations in the TMTC3 gene. To date, 13 patients with homozygous or compound heterozygous mutations in this gene, from six families, have been reported [3, 4].
A comparison of phenotypes between the patients clearly marks mild-to-moderate ID and the presence of seizures as the common clinical features in all cases (Table 1). In the patients described here, psychomotor development was severely delayed, as it was in a few cases reported by Jerber et al. . However, in the Pakistani family , no such delay was noted. Speech development has also been reported to range from normal to severe delay. The two siblings reported here had absent speech, with the older sibling still unable to speak at 14 years of age. Truncal hypotonia has also been reported in most patients, as is the case here. Based on the data available so far, we propose a clinical key for TMTC3-related disorders. The core phenotype for this disorder includes ID in the presence of generalized tonic-clonic, myoclonic, or nocturnal seizures. In addition, most patients may also show a combination of additional features, such as psychomotor and/or language delay, muscular hypotonia, autistic behaviour, and brain findings suggestive of neuronal migration defects.
A comparison of all the 11 TMTC3 mutations so far known to be associated with a pathogenic phenotype showed some interesting results (Table 2). All mutations are located within the exons and are either missense, nonsense, or frameshift mutations. Splice site mutations have not so far been observed. We used lollipops, a variant visualization tool , to map these 11 mutations onto the primary structure of the TMTC3 protein (Figure 2). The mutations were found to be located across several regions of the protein. The most severe reported phenotypes, especially with relation to psychomotor and speech delay, were associated with homozygous mutations towards the N-terminal part of the protein. Interestingly, the c.211C > T mutation we report in our patients affects the same arginine residue at codon 71 that has been shown to be mutated in one of the previously reported families . Although the phenotype of the ID and seizures is similar between these patients, the latter family had a milder phenotype, especially in relation to motor and speech development. This discrepancy could be explained by the fact that, in the family reported here, the mutation was present in a homozygous state, while the patients with the milder phenotype carried compound heterozygous mutations, with the second mutation affecting the C-terminal domain.
It is known that glycosylation of cell-surface binding receptors, such as cadherins and alpha-dystroglycan, is important for maintaining the interaction between the glial limitans and the extracellular matrix. Defects in mannosylation of these proteins result in developmental disorders associated with neuronal migration defects . In our study, no such migration defects were noted. An Arnold-Chiari type I malformation was visible on the first brain scan, but not in a subsequent scan 10 years later. No other anomalies were noted. This is of interest since all patients reported so far, with the exception of the youngest sibling in the Pakistani family, were reported to have migration defects in the MRI, either in the form of cobblestone lissencephaly or periventricular hypertopia.
With the exception of the one patient from the USA, all others are from the Eastern Mediterranean region. In fact, 6 of the original 13 patients are from the Arab ancestry. Rare recessive disorders tend to appear in populations with a high rate of consanguinity [10, 11]. Apart from the Pakistani family and the American patient, all other patients come from consanguineous families and carry homozygous TMTC3 mutations.
The ease of access to high-throughput molecular technologies such as whole exome sequencing (WES) and whole genome sequencing (WGS) in the clinic has opened new vistas for the molecular diagnoses of patients with rare genetic disorders [12, 13]. Particularly for disorders that have not yet been clearly phenotypically delineated, as are many ID disorders, WES offers a straight-forward and reliable diagnostic tool, which in turn will lead to a more comprehensive clinical characterization of such disorders.
No data were used to support this study.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
I. S. B. Larsen, Y. Narimatsu, H. J. Joshi et al., “Discovery of an O-mannosylation pathway selectively serving cadherins and protocadherins,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 114, no. 42, p. 11163, 2017.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Racapé, J.-P. Duong Van Huyen, R. Danger et al., “The involvement of SMILE/TMTC3 in endoplasmic reticulum stress response,” PLoS One, vol. 6, no. 5, Article ID e19321, 2011.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Jerber, M. S. Zaki, J. Y. Al-Aama et al., “Biallelic mutations in TMTC3, encoding a transmembrane and TPR-containing protein, lead to cobblestone lissencephaly,” The American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 99, no. 5, p. 1181, 2016.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. K. Farhan, K. C. J. Nixon, M. Everest et al., “Identification of a novel synaptic protein, TMTC3, involved in periventricular nodular heterotopia with intellectual disability and epilepsy,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 26, no. 21, p. 4278, 2017.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Richards, N. Aziz, N. Aziz et al., “Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of medical genetics and genomics and the association for molecular pathology,” Genetics in Medicine, vol. 17, no. 5, p. 405, 2015.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Rentzsch, D. Witten, G. M. Cooper, J. Shendure, and M. Kircher, “CADD: predicting the deleteriousness of variants throughout the human genome,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 47, no. 1, p. D886, 2019.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Larkin, G. Blackshields, N. P. Brown et al., “Clustal W and clustal X version 2.0,” Bioinformatics, vol. 23, no. 21, pp. 2947-2948, 2007.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. J. Jay and C. Brouwer, “Lollipops in the clinic: information dense mutation plots for precision medicine,” PLoS One, vol. 11, no. 8, Article ID e0160519, 2016.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. B. Graham, J. C. Sunryd, K. Mathavan et al., “Endoplasmic reticulum transmembrane protein TMTC3 contributes to O-mannosylation of E-cadherin, cellular adherence, and embryonic gastrulation,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 31, no. 3, p. 167, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
GUaRDIAN Consortium, S. Sivasubbu, V. Scaria, and V. Scaria, “Genomics of rare genetic diseases-experiences from India,” Human Genomics, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 52, 2019.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Kahrizi, H. Hu, M. Hosseini et al., “Effect of inbreeding on intellectual disability revisited by trio sequencing,” Clinical Genetics, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 151–159, 2019.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. L. Sawyer, T. Hartley, D. A. Dyment et al., “Utility of whole-exome sequencing for those near the end of the diagnostic odyssey: time to address gaps in care,” Clinical Genetics, vol. 89, no. 3, p. 275, 2016.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Tetreault, E. Bareke, J. Nadaf, N. Alirezaie, and J. Majewski, “Whole-exome sequencing as a diagnostic tool: current challenges and future opportunities,” Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics, vol. 15, no. 6, p. 749, 2015.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar