Scleroderma Renal Crisis in a Case of Mixed Connective Tissue Disease Treated Successfully with Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors

Madieh, Jomana; Khamayseh, Iman; Hrizat, Alaa; Hamadah, Abdurrahman; Gharaibeh, Kamel

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8862405

Case Reports in Nephrology

On this page

Abstract Introduction Case Report Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Consent Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Case Report | Open Access

Volume 2021 | Article ID 8862405 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8862405

Scleroderma Renal Crisis in a Case of Mixed Connective Tissue Disease Treated Successfully with Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors

Jomana Madieh,¹Iman Khamayseh,¹Alaa Hrizat,¹Abdurrahman Hamadah,²and Kamel Gharaibeh¹

Academic Editor: Salih Kavukcu

Received08 Sept 2020

Revised10 Dec 2020

Accepted23 Dec 2020

Published07 Jan 2021

Abstract

Mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD) is a rheumatic disease syndrome with overlapping features of scleroderma, systemic lupus erythematosus, and polymyositis. An extremely rare but serious complication that can occur in MCTD is scleroderma renal crisis (SRC). There have been different approaches to the treatment of SRC associated with MCTD. We present a case of MCTD with chronic features of Raynaud’s phenomenon, dermatomyositis, and thrombocytopenia complicated with acute SRC which showed a great response to ACE inhibitors. Here, we advise the early and aggressive use of ACE inhibitors as soon as SRC is suspected.

1. Introduction

Mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD) is a rheumatic disease syndrome originally described in 1972 and applied to patients with overlapping clinical features of systemic sclerosis (scleroderma), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and polymyositis along with the presence of high titers of a distinctive antibody to the U1 ribonucleoprotein (U1 RNP) [1, 2]. Clinical features of high frequency include Raynaud’s phenomenon, arthralgias, swollen hands, fingers with a sausage-like appearance, esophageal dysfunction, and muscle weakness. MCTD can potentially affect various organ systems resulting in pulmonary, renal, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and central nervous system manifestations [3, 4]. Scleroderma renal crisis (SRC) is an extremely rare complication in MCTD [5, 6]. It typically presents as an accelerated hypertension of sudden onset and acute renal injury, with or without microangiopathic hemolytic anemia or thrombocytopenia [5, 7, 8]. Several reports have emphasized the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and their dramatic improvement on the outcomes and survival of scleroderma patients experiencing SRC [8–11]. However, only a few reports on the treatment of SRC in MCTD exist [5, 6, 12]. In this article, we report a rare case of MCTD complicated by SRC which was treated successfully with ACEi.

2. Case Report

This is a case of a 30-year-old female with a history of MCTD. She had been diagnosed with MCTD with a positive ANA: >3.5 U (3–5.9 U is positive, ≥6 is strongly positive) and high titers of anti-RNP antibody: 208.8 IU (anti-RNP > 26 U is positive) associated with Raynaud’s phenomenon, dermatomyositis, chronic thrombocytopenia, and chronic arthralgia 4 months prior to her presentation. Since then, she was treated with azathioprine, prednisone, nifedipine, and naproxen. The patient was brought to the emergency room (ER) after she had experienced two syncopal episodes. Five days prior to admission, she developed a fever (Tmax: 102 F, 38.8 C) associated with recurrent nausea and vomiting. She also reported dyspnea on exertion, palpitations, and myalgia. Despite negative urinary symptoms, she was diagnosed with a urinary tract infection (UTI) based on the urinalysis (UA) findings of pyuria, hematuria, and +2 proteinuria at that time. She had no diarrhea, abdominal pain, chest pain, or new active skin changes.

Initial physical examination in the ER showed the patient to be alert and oriented. Vital signs showed heart rate (HR) of 110 bpm and blood pressure (BP) of 160/108 mmHg. Based on the clinical picture and laboratory findings, she was thought to be dehydrated and 2 liters of 0.9% saline was given intravenously. Two hours later, she developed sudden tachypnea and dyspnea with hypoxaemia and elevated BP (systolic 220 over diastolic 115) that eventually required intubation for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Chest X-ray (CXR) findings were consistent with bilateral pulmonary edema. The patient was placed on nitroglycerine (NG) infusion and transferred to the medical intensive care unit for further management.

Laboratory workup on admission: WBC 8.9 × 10^9/L (4–11 × 10^9), hemoglobin 13.5 g/dl (12–15 g/dL), hematocrit 40.4% (36%–47%), platelet count 165 10³/uL (150–400 × 10^9), serum creatinine (sCr) 1.18 mg/dL (baseline sCR was 0.56 mg/dL), serum bicarbonate 17 mmol/L (18–22 mmol/L), plasma renin activity (PRA) 143.5 ng/mL/hour (normal is ≤ 0.6–4.3 ng/mL/hour), potassium 2.3 mmol/L (3.5–5 mmol/L), haptoglobin 11 mg/dL (50–220 mg/dL), C-reactive protein (CRP) 1.9 mg/L (<5 mg/L), ESR 40 mm/hour (normal is < age/2 mm/hour), serum lactate dehydrogenase 423 U/L (50–150 U/L), arterial pH 7.08 (7.35–7.45), arterial pO₂ 68 mmHg (75–100 mmHg), and arterial HCO₃ 13.3 mmol/L (18–22 mmHg). Urinalysis showed pyuria, proteinuria, and hematuria including RBC casts and dysmorphic RBCs. The patient was found to be oliguric after monitoring urine output for 24 hours (total urine output was 215 ml). Spot protein/Cr ratio was 3.2.

Despite improvement in BP readings (with an IV antihypertensive medication), the patient remained oliguric and sCr continued to rise, peaking at 1.62 mg/dL, which is 3 times her baseline sCr. Given the history of MCTD along with the typical presentation of a possible SRC-like syndrome, the decision was made to initiate Captopril. Within 24 hours from starting captopril, urine output started to increase and oliguria resolved with improvement in renal function as shown in Figure 1. We titrated up the captopril and were able to wean off nicardipine.

On the third day, once the patient was hemodynamically stable and blood pressure was under control, the decision was made to perform a renal biopsy for further workup. It showed thrombotic microangiopathic changes in the interlobular arteries which are consistent with SRC-like syndrome as seen in Figures 2–5. A day later, the patient was successfully extubated. A week later, the patient was discharged with sCr of 0.88 mg/dL and in good condition with the impression of a SRC-like syndrome in MCTD.

3. Discussion

The exact prevalence and incidence of MCTD remain unknown. However, it has always been reported to be more common in females despite the difference in ratios estimated by different studies [13–15].

Being an overlap syndrome, the definitive diagnosis of MCTD can be difficult to achieve [16]. The early clinical manifestations are nonspecific and the disease state is considered an undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD) [16–18]. During this stage, patients commonly complain of fatigue, myalgias, arthralgias, and Raynaud’s phenomenon [16]. Findings suggestive of MCTD occur sequentially evolving over the years [16, 17, 19]. The presence of Raynaud’s phenomenon and high titers of anti-U1 RNP antibodies are strong predictors of future evolution to MCTD [16, 19].

As MCTD was initially described in 1972, it was thought to be a connective tissue disease syndrome that is of favourable prognosis and excellent responsiveness to corticosteroid therapy compared to other connective tissue diseases (CTD) [1]. It was suggested that antibodies to ENA (i.e., U1 RNP), which are distinct to MCTD, have a protective role [1]. At that time, renal involvement in MCTD had not yet been identified. However, since then, as more cases of MCTD were being reported, findings of cardiac, pulmonary, and renal involvement emerged and did not have as much of a favourable prognosis as initially perceived.

Multiple criteria (Sharp, Alarcon–Segovia, Khan, Kasukawa) were established for the diagnosis of MCTD based on the serological findings of high-titer-anti-U1 RNP antibodies accompanied by other clinical features of the disease. One study showed that the Alarcon–Segovia’s criteria had a sensitivity and specificity of 63% and 86%, respectively [14].

Renal involvement in MCTD is uncommon (10%–26% of patients) and is often asymptomatic [5]. In a study looking at the renal involvement in MCTD, it was found that the only early indicator of renal disease was an abnormal urinalysis with no overt clinical features. Serologic studies were not a helpful predictor either. Renal involvement can occur as glomerulonephritis (GN), nephrotic syndrome, amyloidosis, and, rarely, the renal vasculopathy characteristic of scleroderma, hence the name scleroderma renal crisis (SRC) [12, 20].

SRC in scleroderma occurs in 5–10% of patients [21]. However, in MCTD, it is a severe complication that has rarely been reported [3, 5, 6, 22, 23]. It typically presents as a sudden onset of accelerated hypertension (which could often be malignant) and acute renal injury with or without microangiopathic hemolytic anemia or thrombocytopenia [1, 7, 20].

The biochemical picture of a patient with SRC includes elevated serum creatinine, microangiopathic hemolytic anemia (MAHA), thrombocytopenia, and hyperreninemia. Urinalysis commonly shows hematuria, proteinuria, and granular casts visible on microscopy [7, 8, 24, 25].

Although renal biopsies are necessary to confirm the diagnosis and exclude other concurrent pathological processes, they are not regularly requested in SRC [7]. The histological picture of SRC is thrombotic microangiopathy similar to that seen in idiopathic malignant hypertension. Primary small vessel manifestations usually predominate over glomerular changes. Histological findings may vary along the course of the disease [7] (see Table 1).

In some cases, SRC can remain asymptomatic, reflecting an ongoing subclinical renal injury [7]. The acute onset and rapid progression of renal injury could be triggered by high-dose steroids (≥15 mg/day of prednisone), diffuse skin involvement, new-onset anemia, and new cardiac events. Although the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents has not been reported as a precipitating factor for SRC, these drugs can induce acute kidney injury (AKI). The reduced synthesis of renal vasodilating prostaglandins (PGE2 and PGI2) and, consequently, compromised renal blood flow can lead to reversible renal ischemia and AKI [25, 26]. Patients who need systemic steroids therapy should be carefully monitored for the development of SRC [8].

In this case, our patient had initially received aggressive fluid resuscitation causing a sudden elevation in her blood pressure. This may have contributed to further deterioration in her kidney function by aggravating more endothelial injury. She had also been managed for MCTD by chronic steroids (prednisone 10 mg/day) and was started on NSAIDS 4 weeks prior to admission. According to Steen [25], cautious use of NSAIDs is prudent in systemic sclerosis patients at high risk for SRC. Therefore, NSAIDs may have also contributed to the precipitation of SRC in our patient.

The treatment of SRC is based on the aggressive control of hypertension with ACEi [9, 10]. The best outcome without reaching dialysis is exhibited when ACEi therapy is given promptly and aggressively. Serum creatinine less than 265 µmol/L (3 mg/dL) at the time of initiation of ACEi is also associated with favourable prognoses [10]. Consequently, ACEi therapy should be started as soon as scleroderma renal crisis is diagnosed [7, 8, 10]. MCTD patients that are experiencing features of scleroderma should be continuously screened for SRC by the regular monitoring of blood pressure and renal functions [8, 10].

To our knowledge, only nine cases of MCTD with SRC have been reported as summarized in Table 1. All patients but one [27] had features of scleroderma, most commonly Raynaud’s phenomenon. Of the nine cases gathered, eight cases were treated with ACEi, three of which developed end-stage renal disease requiring chronic hemodialysis [12, 23, 27]. The patient who was not started on ACEi eventually became haemodialysis-dependent [22]. Of the five patients who responded to ACEi, three had sCr levels less than 3 mg/dl at the time of initiation of treatment [6, 23, 28]. This comes in agreement with a previous study conducted by Steen and Medsger that exhibited the best outcomes of ACEi treatment in patients with sCr concentrations less than 3 mg/dl [10].

Several causes might have led to the failure of renal recovery in the patients who received ACEi treatment [12, 23, 27]. Khalil et al. [12] suggest that this outcome in their case was attributed to preexisting chronic kidney disease, previous exposure to high-dose steroids, and delayed initiation of ACEi. Similarly, Khan et al. [23] reported a patient with a two-year history of illness that has been dealt with inadequately resulting in a late diagnosis, the development of advanced chronic kidney disease, and failure of early initiation of therapy with ACEi. Greenberg and Amato [27] reported a case of MCTD with SRC precipitated by high-dose steroids (prednisone 60 mg/day) which did not respond to ACEi treatment. In their report, they explained that corticosteroids inhibit prostacyclin production and the subsequent rise in ACE levels in patients with an underlying microangiopathy involving the kidneys is enough to cause renal failure.

4. Conclusion

Despite the rarity of SRC in MCTD, it should not be overlooked. A sudden rise in blood pressure or the combination of high blood pressure and acute kidney injury (with or without MAHA) in a MCTD patient should be considered SRC-like syndrome until proven otherwise. SRC-like syndrome is a serious complication which, if not treated promptly, might lead to permanent renal damage.

Several reports have emphasized the use of ACEi and its dramatic improvement on the outcomes and survival of scleroderma patients experiencing SRC. However, only a few reports on the treatment of SRC in MCTD exist. Among these reports, including our case, ACEi have shown a major role in the treatment of such crises and the prevention of permanent renal damage. We should consider ACEi a first-line treatment for SRC-like syndrome in MCTD as already documented to be a first-line treatment for SRC in patients with scleroderma. Therefore, in a patient diagnosed with MCTD, we recommend early initiation of treatment with ACEi as soon as SRC is suspected. Future retrospective and prospective studies should be done to further confirm our conclusion.

Data Availability

Data (laboratory and biopsy results) used to support the findings of this case report are included within the article.

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

J. Madieh, I. Khamayseh, and K. Gharaibeh searched the literature and drafted the manuscript. A. Hrizat and A. Hamadah revised and edited the paper. All authors reviewed the manuscript. Jomana Madieh and Iman Khamayseh contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to their patient who agreed on publishing this case.

References

G. C. Sharp, W. S. Irvin, E. M. Tan, R. G. Gould, and H. R. Holman, “Mixed connective tissue disease-an apparently distinct rheumatic disease syndrome associated with a specific antibody to an extractable nuclear antigen (ENA),” The American Journal of Medicine, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 148–159, 1972.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. J. Venables, “Mixed connective tissue disease,” Lupus, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 132–137, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O.-D. Ortega-Hernandez and Y. Shoenfeld, “Mixed connective tissue disease: an overview of clinical manifestations, diagnosis and treatment,” Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 61–72, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. J. DeMarco, M. H. Weisman, J. R. Seibold et al., “Predictors and outcomes of scleroderma renal crisis: the high-dose versus low-dose D-penicillamine in early diffuse systemic sclerosis trial,” Arthritis & Rheumatism, vol. 46, no. 11, p. 2983, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Cheta, S. Rijhwani, and H. Rust, “Scleroderma renal crisis in mixed connective tissue disease with full renal recovery within 3 months: a case report with expanding treatment modalities to treat each clinical sign as an independent entity,” Journal of Investigative Medicine High Impact Case Report, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1–5, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Satoh, H. Imai, T. Yasuda, H. Wakui, A. B. Miura, and Y. Nakamoto, “Sclerodermatous renal crisis in a patient with mixed connective tissue disease,” American Journal of Kidney Diseases, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 215–218, 1994.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Batal, R. T. Domsic, T. A. Medsger, and S. Bastacky, “Scleroderma renal crisis: a pathology perspective,” International Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 2010, Article ID 543704, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. P. Denton, G. Lapadula, L. Mouthon, and U. MüllerLadner, “Renal complications and scleroderma renal crisis,” Rheumatology (Oxford), vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 32–35, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Teixeira, L. Mouthon, A. Mahr et al., “Mortality and risk factors of scleroderma renal crisis: a French retrospective study of 50 patients,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 110–116, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. D. Steen and T. A. Medsger, “Long-term outcomes of scleroderma renal crisis,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 133, no. 8, pp. 600–603, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. D. Steen, J. P. Costantino, A. P. Shapiro, and T. A. Medsger, “Outcome of renal crisis in systemic sclerosis: relation to availability of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 113, no. 5, pp. 352–357, 1990.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. M. Khalil, N. Iftikhar, S. A. Hussain, and J. Tan, “Scleroderma renal crisis in a newly diagnosed mixed connective tissue disease resulting in a dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease despite angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition,” CEN Case Report, vol. 2, pp. 41–45, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Gunnarsson, Ø. Molberg, I.-M. Gilboe, J. T. Gran, and Pahnor1 Study Group, “The prevalence and incidence of mixed connective tissue disease: a national multicentre survey of Norwegian patients,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 1047–1051, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Burdt, R. W. Hoffman, S. L. Deutscher, G. S. Wang, J. C. Johnson, and G. C. Sharp, “Long-term outcome in mixed connective tissue disease: longitudinal clinical and serologic findings,” Arthritis & Rheumatism, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 899–909, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Nakae, F. Furusawa, and R. Kasukawa, “A nationwide epidemiological survey on diffuse collagen diseases: estimation of prevalence rate in Japan,” in Mixed Connective Tissue Disease and Anti-nuclear Antibodies, R. Kasukawa and G. Sharp, Eds., p. 9, Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1987.
View at: Google Scholar
P. H. Pepmueller, “Undifferentiated connective tissue disease, mixed connective tissue disease, and overlap syndromes in rheumatology,” Missouri Medicine, vol. 113, no. 2, pp. 136–140, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Mosca, C. Tani, C. Neri, C. Baldini, and S. Bombardieri, “Undifferentiated connective tissue diseases (UCTD),” Autoimmunity Reviews, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–4, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Bodolay and G. Szegedi, “Undifferentiated connective tissue disease,” Orvosi Hetilap, vol. 150, no. 19, pp. 867–872, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Farhey and E. Hess, “Mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD) and undifferentiated connective tissue disease (UCTD),” Current Rheumatology Reviews, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 261–267, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Celikbilek, R. Elsurer, B. Afsar, H. B. Ozdemir, S. Sezer, and N. F. Ozdemir, “Mixed connective tissue disease: a case with scleroderma renal crisis following abortion,” Clinical Rheumatology, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 1545–1547, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Denton and C. Mblack, “Scleroderma-clinical and pathological advances,” Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 271–290, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Vij, V. Agrawal, and M. Jain, “Scleroderma renal crisis in a case of mixed connective tissue disease,” Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 844–848, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Khan, I. Khan, T. Ahmad, and H. Noor, “Mixed connective tissue disorder associated with scleroderma renal crisis,” Journal of Nephrology & Therapeutics, vol. 4, no. 2, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
V. D. Steen, T. A. Medsger, T. A. Osial, G. L. Ziegler, A. P. Shapiro, and G. P. Rodnan, “Factors predicting development of renal involvement in progressive systemic sclerosis,” The American Journal of Medicine, vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 779–786, 1984.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. D. Steen, “Scleroderma renal crisis,” Rheumatic Disease Clinics of North America, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 315–333, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Dixit, T. Doan, R. Kirschner, and N. Dixit, “Significant acute kidney injury due to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: inpatient setting,” Pharmaceuticals, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 1279–1285, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. A. Greenberg and A. A. Amato, “Inflammatory myopathy associated with mixed connective tissue disease and scleroderma renal crisis,” Muscle & Nerve, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 1562–1566, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. N. Andersen and J. Vasko, “Scleroderma renal crisis and concurrent isolated pulmonary hypertension in mixed connective tissue disease and overlap syndrome: report of two cases,” Clinical Rheumatology, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 164–169, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2021 Jomana Madieh et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

2307

Downloads

1288

Citations